Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/17/2012 1:09:00 PM PDT by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: generally

Absolutely!

My husband hollers at the TV during every debate: “More workers! That’s what we need rather than higher taxes — more workers.”


2 posted on 10/17/2012 1:13:00 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

There are only so many hours in a day, or minutes in a debate. Romney did fine. Also, he made this point about 10 times.


3 posted on 10/17/2012 1:15:15 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

He has made these points several times in the debates.


4 posted on 10/17/2012 1:19:58 PM PDT by frogjerk (OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally; All

R/R has mentioned the effect of lower taxes. Their main failing is not pointing out the difference between tax RATE cuts and tax REVENUE cuts.

We have had four periods of tax RATE cuts: Harding, Kennedy, Reagan and Bush II. In each case the RATE cuts led to REVENUE increases for the reason mentioned: the economy expands; hires more people; they pay more taxes.

Even Keynes spoke of the need for tax cuts during a recession. Republicans have yet to stress this critical difference.


5 posted on 10/17/2012 1:34:56 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Romney wants equal opportunities

Obama wants equal outcomes


6 posted on 10/17/2012 1:36:23 PM PDT by EagleClaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Romney may not be spelling that out for a reason and the reason may be 1) he’s not sure there will ever be any more jobs (peak employment having been passed due to automation and 2) he doesn’t want to scare off any potential voters who have no interest whatsoever in working; which is to say that if he even so much as mentions that there would be fewer people on welfare, the Media will paint him all over with the “Cutting Welfare to balance the budget” sign.


8 posted on 10/17/2012 1:44:15 PM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Romney’s mistake, if any, is the assumption he is speaking to intelligent adults. Many voters won’t digest more than simple sound bites. If it won’t fit on a bumper sticker, many voters won’t bother to think deeper.


9 posted on 10/17/2012 1:52:05 PM PDT by vortigern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Mitt Romney should dwell on Rush Limbaugh’s old axiom that compassion is not about how many people are getting government help, but about how many people don’t need it.


11 posted on 10/17/2012 2:24:58 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

That’s the dynamic scoring Cain talked about.

While he may have mentioned in the debates the fact that more workers means more tax revenue, he definitely hasn’t pointed out how less people on food stamps, unemployment and welfare means less expenditures by the government.


15 posted on 10/17/2012 3:30:58 PM PDT by JediJones (ROMNEY/RYAN: TURNAROUND ARTISTS ***** OBAMA/BIDEN: BULL $HIT ARTISTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally
Tax cuts represent money WHICH ACTUALLY EXISTS. This necessarily must become capital or die. When it becomes capital (assuming a certain success rate) the economy expands as does the governments intake-even if the governments percentage is cut. Cheap energy facilitates this process.
16 posted on 10/17/2012 4:33:10 PM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Romney is winning. He is beating the smartest man in the universe who also happens to be the best campaigner in the universe. He is also beating the fourth estate in their nefarious effort to drag Obama across the finish line. Romney is a smart guy, smarter than Obama by far and I expect that ROmneys ground game will reflect his business acumen and Obama will be beaten soundly.


17 posted on 10/17/2012 4:39:47 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson