So now under this regime Congress cannot sue the Executive branch because we think the Constitution does not allow it? Excuse me but there are several tons of precendence to the contrary Mr Holder
1 posted on
10/16/2012 7:53:10 AM PDT by
Snuph
To: Snuph
After Mr. Romney is elected, I hope he decides to clean house in the Justice and Treasury departments—house cleanings that include prison sentences for demonstrated abuse of power, bribes-taking, dereliction of duty—or what else is a drunk Secret Service agent intoxicated and sleeping on the job doing?
2 posted on
10/16/2012 8:07:07 AM PDT by
righttackle44
( I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine . . .)
To: Snuph
In its court papers, the Justice Department says the Constitution does not permit the courts to resolve the political dispute between the executive branch and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that is seeking the records. Well, there is a provision provided by the Constitution, and it doesn't have anything to do with the courts. It's called "impeachment". Does the Administration disagree with this procedure?
3 posted on
10/16/2012 8:20:54 AM PDT by
no-s
(when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
To: Snuph
4 posted on
10/16/2012 8:31:34 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few, and let another take his office.")
To: Snuph
5 posted on
10/23/2012 12:51:37 PM PDT by
neverdem
( Xin loi min oi)
To: Snuph
No conflict of interest HERE! LOL!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
