Skip to comments.
Which State Distorted Jobless Claims Data
Wall Street Journal ^
| 10/11/2012
| Sarah Portlock
Posted on 10/11/2012 9:48:17 AM PDT by bjc
One omission by one stateyou wouldnt think it would be a big deal, but in this case it drove the number down by 10%, said analyst Stephen Stanley with Pierpont Securities.
Economists are speculating the state could be California, the most populous state in the nation.
It was likely a state with a large population and we suspect that it was California based on the occasional massive swings that have occurred in its claims data in the past, said Daniel Silver, an economist with JPMorgan, in a note.
In short, this reading is worthless in terms of informing on the general economy, Mr. Stanley wrote in a research note.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: statistics; unemployment
A quick look at the Californbia data shows that (a) no September data has been posted for California and (b) based on past 12 years in California the September number should be 66,000 new unemployment claims suggesting that the magic number of 400,000 new claims may have been breeched. If one was a cynic, one might suspect the delay was not an accident.
1
posted on
10/11/2012 9:48:23 AM PDT
by
bjc
To: bjc
...I still think Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day was a good sign of whats coming Obamas way November 6th.
If that is true, this election will be more of a rout than I thought. And I’m pretty confident the truth will come out before the election.
2
posted on
10/11/2012 9:52:06 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: bjc
California would be my number 1 suspect.
3
posted on
10/11/2012 9:56:50 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: bjc
I was unwilling to accept the conspiracy Jack Welch voiced last week about unemployment. I didn’t want to believe the left was that crude in their methods. This latest trick, counting only 49 states and leaving out California (with the no doubt huge impact of the petroleum price explosion), shows the left to be crude and desperate. Now everyone can see that.
4
posted on
10/11/2012 10:00:50 AM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Hopey changey low emission unicorns and a crap sandwich)
To: muir_redwoods
The census was politicized.
Why the surprise on jobs numbers ?
5
posted on
10/11/2012 10:04:24 AM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
To: muir_redwoods
big govt and big media and big business....when they connive for a purpose there is very little we mere peasants can do....
just get off the grid when you can I guess...stop feeding the monster....
6
posted on
10/11/2012 10:07:39 AM PDT
by
cherry
To: bjc
I would guess California too. Dems here will do ANYTHING to win!
7
posted on
10/11/2012 10:09:06 AM PDT
by
Randy Larsen
(Damned if I do, Damned if I don't. Damn it, I will!)
To: bjc
Real convenient! Chi=town thug politics at its best
8
posted on
10/11/2012 10:14:27 AM PDT
by
kenmcg
(t)
To: cripplecreek
It has been confirmed by Fox and Rush... and me.
LLS
9
posted on
10/11/2012 11:24:29 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
To: muir_redwoods
Only 49 states reported? What happened to the other 8?
10
posted on
10/11/2012 11:59:55 AM PDT
by
fhayek
To: fhayek
I don’t know but it wasn’t Guam. Guam capsized.
11
posted on
10/11/2012 12:40:41 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Hopey changey low emission unicorns and a crap sandwich)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson