Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Obama deliberately try to stage a hostage taking in Benghazi as an “October Surprise”
hillbuzz ^ | 10/8 | kevin dujan

Posted on 10/08/2012 5:34:49 PM PDT by RummyChick

Today I’m going on the radio in Los Angeles to accuse the Obama administration of deliberately attempting to stage a hostage-taking in Benghazi as part of a manufactured “October Surprise” that Obama intended to make himself look great on the foreign stage in the lead up to the election. The plan — if you were paying attention — was set in motion at the Democrats’ convention in Charlotte in early September when repeated mentions of Obama as a “foreign policy president” were made. This was timed to lead up to September 11th…when deliberately lowered security at the Benghazi consulate (and OTHER consulates and embassies in the Mideast) was supposed to encourage Muslims to take Americans hostage like they did in 1979. Only, Obama’s plan was to negotiate their quick released by trading the “Blind Sheik” from the 1993 World Trade Center bombings for any Americans taken hostage on 9/11/2001. The plan was to make Obama look like “a badass” and a to have him revel in this through October and into the November election. In fact, the hostages were probably planned for release not long before the Foreign Policy Debate (the last of the three presidential debates this year) in Boca Raton, Florida. This was supposed to show Obama standing up to Muslims, negotiating “peace”, and proving to the world what an effective and strong leader he was.

Only…it blew up in his face and the administration has been in overdrive trying to cover this stuff up ever since. The only way any of this makes any sense, including the deliberate lowering of security and the disregard of Ambassador Chris Steven’s multiple pleas for help on the ground in Libya in the weeks prior to his murder, is that Barack Obama WANTED a hostage situation to happen so he could “look presidential by resolving it in October”… but the Muslims in Libya went overboard and killed people instead of just taking them hostage. This also explains why no effort was made to even look for the Ambassador and others missing from the consulate for many hours: Obama’s gang just assumed he was taken hostage as planned and were STUNNED to learn the ambassador was murdered.

Why else would Obama go to sleep so casually at 3am that night if he didn’t think things were just going according to plan…but when he woke up at 11am the next day he found that all Hell broke loose instead. And then the coverup began.

Folks, more people are going to eventually go to jail for what happened at Benghazi than went to prison for Watergate. This is a coverup that goes directly to Barack Obama himself. I have friends who lived through Watergate and who repeatedly tell me they had no idea in the initial days after a “break-in was reported in Democrat offices” that it would eventually topple Nixon and bring down so many powerful people. I love the woman on a personal level, but if Hillary Clinton knew about any of this and didn’t stop this scheme for a “hostage-taking October Surprise” then she belongs in prison too…along with Barack Obama, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, and a host of other women and effeminate men who thought lowering security at consulates so “something would happen that we could use in October” was a good idea.

Read more http://hillbuzz.org/did-obama-deliberately-try-to-stage-a-hostage-taking-in-benghazi-as-an-october-surprise-pr-stunt-that-blew-up-in-his-face-listen-live-at-330pm-cst-to-find-out-52149


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911ii; benghazi; benghazitheory; hillbuzz; impeachnow; kevindujan; liby; libya; obama; wagthevideo; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

You’re exactly right. Thank you.

Fast & Furious for the Second Amendment
Benghazi for the First Amendment


61 posted on 10/08/2012 7:00:51 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

“Folks, more people are going to eventually go to jail for what happened at Benghazi than went to prison for Watergate.” That’s a real kneeslapper! Or it WOULD BE if it weren’t related to such a sorry situation, but mostly because it will never happen! Nobody on “R” side has the stones to make it happen......any more than anybody is going to the slammer for F & F! Congressional hearings? It just occurred to me today that CONGRESS is where atrocities, scandal cases and high crime investigations GO TO DIE!


62 posted on 10/08/2012 7:02:21 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

What if instead of trading the blind shiek, Obama planned to send in a rescue team comprised of SEALS? He probably envisioned a night insertion via helicopter and a quick snatch and grab operation. After the relatively smooth Osama op, Obama figured nothing would go wrong.


63 posted on 10/08/2012 7:02:35 PM PDT by Harley (Those that don't engage in politics are destined to be governed by inferiors. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”

Thank you for that, I was trying to remember just how that went.


64 posted on 10/08/2012 7:07:45 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

The fact that we’re even discussing it as plausible is a pretty sickening reflection on Obama and his friends.

In the end, it sounds too far too me (possible though - I sense there is at least something beyond pure incompetence involved) but the main thing is - I wouldn’t put it past them - and that in itself says enough.

Would they do it if they could pull it off? This administration? In a second.

It’s always been part of Commie and Muslim code - all cult style codes where the individual is expendable - that if something furthers the great vision, it is by default not immoral - including all forms of immorality and trickery.


65 posted on 10/08/2012 7:23:16 PM PDT by HannibalHamlinJr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: IrishPennant

I open doors for women, too. WTF = Why The Face? What did you think it meant, something foul? Be civil!


66 posted on 10/08/2012 7:47:35 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I bet that he would have made the deal secretly, then after his re-election delivery the Blind Sheik.

This is what JFK did with getting the Soviets to remove missiles from Cuba. Behind the scenes we agreed to remove missile from Turkey.


67 posted on 10/08/2012 8:00:27 PM PDT by garjog (We do not want another four more years of the last four years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo

I don’t put ANYTHING past this man and his cohorts!


68 posted on 10/08/2012 8:02:02 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
There are some facts that support something like this.
69 posted on 10/08/2012 9:05:50 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Sorry, this makes no sense. You don’t set such things in motion without control of all the acting parties. Anyone can understand that the odds of success are very low with the unknowns evident in this “plan”.

There may well be some dirty business going on, but this isn’t it. Perhaps a doublecross? And that’s why Obama looked like death at the debate. Maybe he thought he had control of all the actors. Maybe the wrong group showed up first?

Still, smart power is the likely problem here. They wanted a light footprint and trusted the govt too much, with results like those in Afghanistan. I can’t believe some generals in ‘Stan haven’t resigned in protest over the ROE and the killings of Americans by Afghan soldiers.

Yep, I’m going with ‘utter ideological stupidity followed by a coverup’ on this one. I’ll keep my eyes open though.


70 posted on 10/08/2012 9:06:07 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Watergate was nothing more than the theft of some campaign notes. THIS, what you are suggesting, is far, far more than that. Let’s just establish some givens: the breadth of the stupidity of such a plan is not beyond this administration; That they would have to depend on the actions of a gaggle of 7th century retards and HOPE they got it right is, also, not beyond this bunch; that they would engage in such a wide-reaching cover-up, aided and abetted by a complicit press, is absolutely believable. Still and all, this is very hard to believe that even THEY could do such a thing.

I agree, more than you could ever know, that Obama and this administration is evil from east to west. But this is something I just cannot believe.


71 posted on 10/08/2012 9:27:56 PM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

It would give this more credibility if they also staged it to look like he was going to save the life of a high ranking Gay person from sure terror and from Homophobes by making it look like he’s the gay protector from Homophobes ...... no, wait, they did have a gay person in harms way and did nothing to help him.


72 posted on 10/08/2012 10:04:05 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally
" Fast & Furious for the Second Amendment. Benghazi for the election win. "

And now CHI-CORNGATE...

CHI-CORN, doing the job of outsourcing fraud and scamming to China that Acorn got caught doing.

73 posted on 10/08/2012 10:07:35 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234
" blind Sheik "

Blind Sheik's impression of St. Schultz " I see nothinnnnnnnng "
74 posted on 10/08/2012 10:09:10 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Let me see if I get this, because I missed it before:

They posted an openly gay man to be Ambassador to Libya?

Why don’t we replace him with Porky Pig? Adam Sandler? Alan Dershowitz?

How about RuPaul? He’s looking for a job right?

Elton John? He, his partner, and his small boy can go and live in the Arab Springtime.

“Springtime for Hitler, and Germany!”


75 posted on 10/08/2012 10:11:36 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

That would explain why from reports that he was not acting right, acting paranoid, and the reports that the government didn’t know where he was at for a few hours.


76 posted on 10/08/2012 10:16:54 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Only, Obama’s plan was to negotiate their quick released by trading the “Blind Sheik” from the 1993 World Trade Center bombings for any Americans taken hostage on 9/11/2001. The plan was to make Obama look like “a badass” and a to have him revel in this through October and into the November election.

Totally loony conspiracy theory!

Too many ways for such a plan to go wrong. Even if everything worked as planned, he'd be a weak-kneed traitor for having sprung the Blind Sheik. And that would be the best outcome. Most of the possible outcomes would have Obama looking like the jackass he is, not a badass!

77 posted on 10/08/2012 10:19:30 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
So, are you LIHOP or MIHOP?

LOL!

78 posted on 10/08/2012 10:24:04 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo
" I simply can’t bring myself to believe this. I disagree with Obama on every level, but I don’t think he would do something like this. "

The EPA using humans as guinea pigs in human experiments in a Auschwitz style gassing experiment in testing the effects of diesel smoke. ?

Think again.
79 posted on 10/08/2012 10:25:00 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Forgot to add in there: Department of Homeland Security doing the spying job on Americans that the KGB don’t want to do.


80 posted on 10/08/2012 10:27:25 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson