I didn't see the interview. Chris Wallace is usually better than most. The questions quoted above seem appropriate to me. He asked if he believed something and then asked him why he believed it. Not sure what's wrong with that
Seeing it in print, and seeing it on the screen are not the same. You had to see the condescending, rude and arrogant manner in which Chris Wallace intervied Paul Ryan. He was constantly interrupting, and almost blatant inviting a flippant response. Of course, Ryan responded with grace and tact. Had he not done so, it would have been the big news story.
Once again, Wallace being so rude and interrupting put Ryan on the defensive the entire interview. I just have never seen Obama interviewed in this manner, except for the Univision interview, and the time the journalist yelled questions at him. To be fair, shouldn't both be interview in the same manner? Do you think the media is biased? Why do you say that?