I wonder if this measure runs afoul of the First Amendment to say nothing of doctor/patient privilege. Sure and who’s going to test it to find out?
Justice Roberts would approve of the new law. He doesn’t want to hurt the image of the court.
Next will be formalizing restrictions on parents bringing moral arguments into discussions of sexual matters.
The stated goal of the Sex Positive Agenda advocates has long been to end all moral arguments over all sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).
They seek to see everyone sexually active at every age and consider abstinence to be an unhealthy suppression of sexual desires.
Religion is now against the law in Caliphony. Thank a Communist.
“I wonder if this measure runs afoul of the First Amendment to say nothing of doctor/patient privilege. Sure and who’s going to test it to find out?”
Doctor/patient privilege only exists to the extent that liberals allow it, since conservatives are TOO WHIPPED to speak up.