Posted on 09/18/2012 6:20:55 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota
What Romney should now go after are the reasons why those on fixed incomes have to go on food stamps and other “benefits” such as energy assistance etc.
The price of food, the cost of energy,driven up by regulations and prohibitions designed to change the systems of distribution and use of resources to conform to a socialist ideal.
This magazine is far-left and is named for a woman who voted for Calvin Coolidge in 1924. (Coolidge's Democrat opponent in that election was later the lawyer for the pro-segregation side in Brown v. Board of Education.)
Good, good point. “...tells the truth, massive scandal.” Thinking people will be able to discern the absolutely craven behavior of the media.
Truth secretly caught on tape media panics and wonders what great lie can Obama give to get face time.
Agreed. The media is simply trying to move 5 to 10% of the vote. They’re desperate this year.
You know those liberal electoral pact “states” that have already agreed to give their electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote may find themselves in an electoral pickle if Mitt wins the popular vote but not the electoral
college.
I completely forgot about that. Off hand do you know which states made that EC pact? I think CA may be one of them.
I still don't see how Romney can lead in popular vote, yet trail in electoral. It should be the other way around. I can't believe voters in Texas and Utah are padding out the popular vote more than the libs and takers in NY, Illinois and California.
“Romney may lead in the popular vote, but he is behind on the electoral college”
If Romney wins the popular vote, he will not lose the Electoral College. No way, no how.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.