Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/12/2012 4:50:20 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Sandra, you are over 30 and have done nothing but attend school. Why should anyone listen to you? Get a job. Oh, wait...not so easy with Obamanomics, is it?


2 posted on 09/12/2012 4:53:39 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I also give the Democrats credit for “freedom to marry,” since they argue (persuasively, in my view) that equality under the law means the government should not discriminate between couples based on sexual orientation.

It IS NOT discrimination. The perverts have exactly the same right as you or I to marry. What they want is a government endorsement of their perversion. If you believe that this is discrimination then what about age? Why can’t a 12 year old marry? Or what about quantity? Why can’t 3 or 4 or 5 people marry?


4 posted on 09/12/2012 5:09:37 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for e an the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Real freedom is “freedom to ...”

Democrat “freedom” is “freedom from ...”

responsibility
work
need
motivation
inventive


5 posted on 09/12/2012 5:12:14 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working fors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Typical response to Rush...even on Townhall.com??
Who is the real misogynist, Rush or Sandra herself?
It is Sandra that doesn't like the fact of nature, that she's a woman who has to be responsible for her body, and wants taxpayers to fund drugs that will attempt to block the consequences of her (and other sluts') promiscuity.

Yes, the truth of the matter is, if Sandra isn't a slut herself, she is demonstratively a slut-promoter.
Her choice was to attend a religious institution whose staunch byword is pro-life, anti-contraception. (To an extent that I don't appreciate myself - but I chose not to join the RC church, and I chose not to buy insurance from a RC institution)
Her choice was to bring Catholicism down, rather than lift herself up.

6 posted on 09/12/2012 5:15:35 AM PDT by Nevermore (...just a typical cracker, clinging to my Constitutional rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Birth control ia free - just keep your pants on! It ain’t that hard and it costs NOTHING!


7 posted on 09/12/2012 5:16:46 AM PDT by meyer (It's 1860 all over again - the taxpayer is the new "N" word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If someone else is forced to pay for it, it is not a right.


15 posted on 09/12/2012 3:38:49 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson