The whole purpose of a republic is that the same laws apply to all, not certain laws for certain people.
Is it me, or does it occur to anyone else that the only people in the United States who obsess about race are black people?
The Muzzies have demonstrated for the past 1400 years they are uncivilized savvages and continue to do so eveywhere they are in control or reach a “critical mass”.
It is an affront to the collective American intelligence that one of them is sitting in Congress.
Being anti-Muslim is not more bigoted than being Aanti-Fascist or Anti-NAZI.
They are pretty much the same thing.
“Ellison blasted Republicans as “the party of hate” for having “demonstrated hatred towards Muslims” in adopting the language.”
AND? I learned everything about islam on 9/11. Yeah, something about this religion where the prophet starts raping a 9 year old girl and marrying the kid, makes me such a hateful person then so be it. The sun will rise tomorrow.
Coming from this meathead, I’d take that folderol as a compliment.
Hah!
True enough. The Judicial Branch writes the laws for Shariah implementation.
Take it up with Jesus, you bigoted Muslim.
” Hate that which is evil; hold fast to what is good.” Romans 12:9.
Rep. Ellison: GOP ‘basically a bigoted party’
This statement would be asinine from anyone. Coming from a follower of islam it is beyond hypocritical..
I am bigoted against racist, anti-American, communists. You got a problem with that?
Ellison blasted Republicans as “the party of hate” for having “demonstrated hatred towards Muslims” in adopting the language.
So opposing a form of law that is based on hate, fear, oppression torture and death makes someone a hater??
Mr Ellison STFU.........
Islam IS the enemy of Christianity. And Freedom.
There is something of a legal paradox here.
To start with, the US along with other western nations has long recognized the authority of ecclesiastical courts over their followers who both accept, without coercion, the authority of those courts, *and* whose ruling are not in conflict with secular law. Likewise, secular courts reserve the right to take appeals from ecclesiastical courts when any party before those courts objects to the outcome as unjust.
That is, they are wholly voluntary from beginning to end.
However, this being said, the most serious threat being considered by this law is not religious, but the secular law of other nations.
No fewer than two justices of the Supreme Court of the United States have come out to say that the federal judiciary *should* feel free to consult foreign legal cases before decided US law, *as long* as their decision can be justified with US legal precedent.
Now wait a damn minute!
This is the *real* reason the Republicans included in their platform: “No use of foreign law by U.S. courts in interpreting our Constitution and laws.” As far as they are concerned, if there is no judicial precedent in the US for a judge to reach their decision, they either have to use their own logic to develop it, or state that it is outside of their authority.
Importantly, this puts a lot of efforts at internationalism to the blocks. There will be NO “gray area” between US and international law. It will either be one or the other.
Now this being said, what about Sharia law?
It fails in several of the tests applied to other ecclesiastical laws.
1) It is not free of coercion.
2) Its rulings are *mostly* in conflict with secular law.
3) It veils its activities in secrecy, often with whimsical decisions, and maintains no orderly record that could be used in an appeal to a secular court. It is not objective in any way, nor is there equality before the law.
4) It uses repugnant axioms to reach judgments, axioms that no secular court would agree to.
As such, it fails as a legal system.
So says an Islamic supremacist.
“There has never been any legislation offered to establish Shariah law — not at the federal level, not at the state level. There’s not been a municipal ordinance opposing this, there’s not been anything,”
Of course Keith can’t say the same thing for all of the countries in Europe that have a higher Muslim population than we do, since Shariah law has been proposed in ALL of those countries. He just wants us stupid infidels to think that it won’t happen here.
Blacks join Islam because it provides a cover for their own racism.
Islam is the religion of hate and every black man who joins is filled with hate for the white man.
Ellison is himself eaten up with racism and hate, for a bigot like him to call republicans hateful would normally be humorous, but coming from this idiot it is the height of idiocy.
By the way Ellison and other Black Islamics are not Islamic just a pack of hateful racist a-holes usinf Islam for their own purposes.They don’t really believe in that Allah BS they spout.
He lies, how do I know? he’s a Muslim radical.
Blacks are more racist than Whites
~ Larry Elder, "The Ten Things You Can't Say In America"
Keith Ellison is a Muslim (he took his congressional oath with his hand on the Koran) and a rabid leftist. His predictably terming opposition to any use of ‘foreign law’ stated in the Republican platform as ‘hate’ is the usual leftist hot air. The guy is a race-obsessed loon.