Uh huh. Yeah. Gotcha.
Also, define "Happier".
Just because they’re called “Gay” doesn’t mean the kids are happy.
I expect they’re not at all.
Because it's healthy to be deprived of a father? Where do these people come up with this nonsense?
Did Jerry Sanduski participate in this survery or with this article?
Gays make up a mere 1-2% of the US population. Do these idiots over at Salon think they speak for all of the rest of us in this country?
Uh huh. Yeah. Gotcha.
Also, define "Happier".
It`s a farce.
Gay`s can`t make kids,-
they depend upon real marriages for kids-
Ask any gay: “How are your gay parents today?”.
The ideal family is the multi-generational family that was exticted in the middle of last century when welfare took over caring for the older generation in households and we switched to the “nuclear” family structure, little did we know that was a stepping stone to the complet dissolution of the family as a unit.
The Old timers are now kept segregated fromt he family and are unable to pass their timeless wisdom onward to the younger generation, what fills this vaccum? Government control, plain and simple.
This also leads to a lack in respect for the elders, this “infantized” generation makes the manipulation of the masses far easier than it once was....
Eventually, it will be mandatory.
Well the arithmetic isn’t going to work since soon there wont be any more kids to worry about....
How many of those kids are mentally healthy and happy?
No razzing from other kids regarding their two mommies?
Yeah right. Consider the source.
Gay Parents Study Suggesting Downside For Kids Draws Fire From Social Scientists
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/12/gay-parents-study-kids-social-scientists_n_1589177.html
Ask Rip Taylor if he resents being turned into a sex toy by his aunts?
This latest just furthers that perception.
Those studies cited show no such thing based on “science”. These were self selected studies meaning that the candidates knew what the study was testing and volunteered the answers. Do you really expect people who know they are having a study of the validity of their alternative lifestyle to not answer questions in such a way to produce an affirmative result? The Regnerus study on the other hand applied a rigid scientific methodology designed to eliminate the bias of such “survey studies?” which is in vogue in the social sciences.
The big problem with the lesbian study in particular is the definition of happy and the definition of harm. Also the abuse analysis is not the least capable of being answered by the self selected group. Its like excluding the most likely to be disfunctional individuals and then exclaiming that you found no disfunction. The reason for the screaming concerning the Regnerus study is that it applys real science to the issue and that is where the gay activists will always lose. If they can’t gin up the data and have researchers intimidated into never reporting findings not supportive of their harmful lifestyle they lose.
This is why it is very important conservatives stay active in the sciences. So much of leftist activism claims to use “science” when in reality they are using loaded dice.
Here is a great article by Julie Hamilton, Ph.D. describing the misinformation that abounds.
http://narth.com/2012/05/misinformation-rampant-in-the-mental-health-field/
Yeah, right Salon. This is what I think about your gay “studies”, pull my finger.
I anesthetized a young girl (11yrs old) at work last week for a colposcopy to evaluate her complaints of abdominal pain. She had a huge, extensive psych history, including a diagnosis of bipolar disorder at age 8.
Her mom was the biggest bull dyke I’ve seen in a long time.
According to the child’s medical record, she lives at home “with her two moms & nonbiological brother”.
Yeah. What a happy home /s
I once had an acquaintance who married a woman who’d left a lesbian relationship in which they’d adopted a boy. He was always complaining about trying to get the boy to stop acting like a sissy.
first they are not gay they are homosexuals, secondly they have done this lie because an in depth survery came out recently which showed kids with natural normal parents raise much happier, healthier parents and kids with homosexuals are hurting their kids mentally.
Also these homosexuals go out and purchase a child and then play family, .
It’s not right, nor is it healthy for a chld to be brought up near two or even homosexual and being taken to their freak parades
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2926157/posts?page=1
first they are not gay they are homosexuals, secondly they have done this lie because an in depth survery came out recently which showed kids with natural normal parents raise much happier, healthier parents and kids with homosexuals are hurting their kids mentally.
Also these homosexuals go out and purchase a child and then play family, .
It’s not right, nor is it healthy for a chld to be brought up near two or even homosexual and being taken to their freak parades