Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Golden Nugget suing card manufacturer after unshuffled cards lead to big winnings for gamblers
nj.com ^ | August 21, 2012

Posted on 08/21/2012 5:05:53 AM PDT by grundle

ATLANTIC CITY — At first, it seemed like a coincidence, the kind of thing that happens from time to time at a casino, where the same number or same sequence of cards happens twice in a row.

But when the players at an April game of mini-baccarat at the Golden Nugget Atlantic City kept seeing the same sequence of cards dealt, over and over and over again, their eyes grew wide and their bets grew bigger, zooming from $10 a hand to $5,000.

Forty-one consecutive winning hands later, the 14 players had racked up more than $1.5 million in winnings — surrounded by casino security convinced they had cheated but unable to prove how.

In a lawsuit against a Kansas City playing card manufacturer, the Golden Nugget contends the cards were unshuffled, despite being promised to be pre-shuffled and ready to use.

It is so basic to the concept of gambling that it often goes without saying: the cards in the deck need to be shuffled before anyone uses them. But in the case of the Golden Nugget, the gamblers did nothing wrong, and deserve to be paid the nearly $1 million they still have coming to them, according to their lawyer, Benjamin Dash.

But in a lawsuit filed against the 14 gamblers in July, that is exactly what the casino seeks, citing state gambling regulations requiring all casino games to offer fair odds — to both sides. The casino's lawsuit asserts the gamblers and the casino both began the game believing it was legal and proper — until the players kept winning over and over again.

The Golden Nugget said it flooded the area with floor persons, managers, supervisors, surveillance and security officers, believing they were watching "a sophisticated swindling and cheating scheme" in progress.

(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: atlantic; cards; casino; goldennugget; nugget; shoe; shuffle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Well, well, well. This has got to be about the most ridiculous lawsuit that I have ever heard about. Yes, I realize there are quite a few contenders in that contests, but this one is even dumber than the other dumb ones... I think.
1 posted on 08/21/2012 5:06:05 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

If I’m not mistaken, there have been several cases in which casinos have refused to pay large jackpots to winners of computerized progressive-slot games, claiming that software bugs were responsible for the large payouts.


2 posted on 08/21/2012 5:12:58 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
An attorney can weigh in, but this sounds like an invitation for counter suits for treble damages plus legal fees and court costs, plus charges of false imprisonment by the one gambler.
3 posted on 08/21/2012 5:14:08 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Depends on what their contract says.


4 posted on 08/21/2012 5:16:08 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

What they were witnessing was totally inept group from the casino manager to the dealer. After the second hand, the dealer should have noticed and called in the floor manager to close the table and inspect the cards. To further add insult to injury, why would they take anyone’s word the decks were pre-shuffled? Never assume anything, especially when it comes to money being involved.


5 posted on 08/21/2012 5:16:30 AM PDT by mazda77 ("Defeating the Totalitarian Lie" By: Hilmar von Campe. Everybody should read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Depends entirely on the contract to buy the cards and the specification. But I doubt the playing card manufacturer is liable for anything more than the cost of the cards. . . and that is only for not delivering product to spec. . .


6 posted on 08/21/2012 5:17:25 AM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border. I **DARE** you to cross it. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

the casino side is laughable. And that their dealers couldn’t figure out what was wrong is ridiculous. The casino deserves to lose this one


7 posted on 08/21/2012 5:24:20 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

House rules? House Rules.


8 posted on 08/21/2012 5:25:52 AM PDT by Coffee... Black... No Sugar (I'm gonna' BICKER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I appreciated the comment at the site asking for damages for getting bad cards.


9 posted on 08/21/2012 5:38:49 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we must tolerate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Casino doesn’t shuffle their own cards? Almost as stupid as gambling at online Casinos.

Here, let me wire you 50 bucks, then I’ll call you and you tell me if I win or not.


10 posted on 08/21/2012 5:42:34 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Ya, cuz the casino would listen a customer complaint about “quick dealing” wherein the house takes advantage of a customer’s delayed move to take down winnings, from the betting area.


11 posted on 08/21/2012 5:42:44 AM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

There was a time when casinos honored winners and paraded them around as free advertising, and it worked. Now if you win at all, they shut the table down and browbeat you. A blackjack shoe has over 6 decks now making card counting obsolete. Once, at the Resorts, I won about 5 blackjack hands in a row, for a total of about $150 and there were 6 people staring at me like I was a child killer.. Sheesh!


12 posted on 08/21/2012 6:01:39 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Is the casino giving back the money it won on the “unshuffled” decks as well? I doubt it.


13 posted on 08/21/2012 6:03:14 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Freedom--tastes like chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It is possible that the cards WERE shuffled.

If you take two identical decks of cards, and shuffle each of them with the exact same pressure and speed, the end result will be the same. It could be that the shuffling machines are too perfect.


14 posted on 08/21/2012 6:14:47 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
", citing state gambling regulations requiring all casino games to offer fair odds — to both sides."

What a load! Anyone ever sit a blackjack table and get on a good shoe or two. Doesn't take too long before the pit boss starts switching dealers and everytime discarding a card out of the shoe. Sniveling, whining Losers!

15 posted on 08/21/2012 6:15:07 AM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Color me skeptical on the gamblers winning this one.


16 posted on 08/21/2012 6:21:15 AM PDT by Loud Mime (The more I learn, the more I realize I don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
This lawyer?

17 posted on 08/21/2012 6:23:59 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Color me skeptical on the gamblers winning this one.

Does the Golden Nugget donate money to Democrats or Republicans?

If they donate to Democrats, they will win.
If they donate to Republicans, they will lose.

18 posted on 08/21/2012 6:27:57 AM PDT by Bon mots ("When seconds count, the police are just minutes away...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grundle
In a lawsuit against a Kansas City playing card manufacturer, the Golden Nugget contends the cards were unshuffled, despite being promised to be pre-shuffled and ready to use.

Is that their argument? "Your Honor, we assumed that the cards were already shuffled so we didn't bother shuffling them ourselves before dealing out hands...."

19 posted on 08/21/2012 6:40:02 AM PDT by Inconvenient Truthteller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCarea51
"citing state gambling regulations requiring all casino games to offer fair odds — to both sides"

What in the world does "fair odds" mean? I know of no casino game where the house doesn't have some percentage of advantage on the odds (that's how they stay in business) - so if "fair odds" doesn't mean a 50/50 chance on every hand then what does it mean?

20 posted on 08/21/2012 6:42:47 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson