Skip to comments.Megadeth’s Dave Mustaine: Obama staged Aurora, Sikh temple shooting
Posted on 08/16/2012 6:38:59 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
Megadeths Dave Mustaine isnt pulling any punches with his quotes as the frontman dropped some heavy thoughts on fans during a recent show in Singapore
During the August 7 performance, the heavy metal singer/guitarist went on a rant telling audience members, "Back in my country, my president is trying to pass a gun ban so he's staging all of these murders, The Huffington Post reported.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
He doing us a favor as he’s taking all of our money.... LOL I love Dave, but this might be a little bit overboard.
What Mustain is saying is outrageous...unless one considers that we have an adnministration that was running Fast and Furious in an attempt to create public sentiment for gun control. But our government would never do something like that. Right?
Obama is certainly evil enough to murder large numbers of innocents to advance his agenda. However, I see no reason to seriously consider the suggestion that Obama is responsible for these particular brutal killings. Brian Terry's murder and the other deaths associated with Fast and Furious are an entirely different story, and I am firmly convinced that Obama personally approved the criminal acts that led to those murders. Obama is a brutal, evil, murderous thug, but we should only give him the blame for his own crimes; he's not the only source of evil in the world.
“Staging” and “taking an advantage of” are two different things.
These conspiracy theories are just stupid. It’s the same dumb stuff the left says.
There are bad people in the world, some of them are just stupid enough to shoot up a Sikh temple thinking they were Muslims. Some of them are bats**t crazy enough to shoot up a movie theater. It doesn’t require some nefarious plot by Hussein to make these things happen.
Anyone have a clue why Mustaine would make this accusation? Even considering Fast&Furious, his claim seems far-fetched.
I think this more fits the bill... I mean, I can't stand the bastard but I highly doubt he would engage in this sort of behavior.
I don’t approve of this any more than I approved of the Dixie Chicks yammering about Bush when they were overseas.
There are many examples to prove your point.
Look what the Nobel Peace Prize winner did to Libya. He redefined "Enforcing A No Fly Zone" to mean "Carpet bombing" an entire nation.
He and Eric Holder are no different than Janet Reno. In order to save the children from the "evil man" they burn everybody up (including the children).
Since it’s really about the seriousness of the charge - and not the presence or lack of evidence - I think a congressional subcommittee needs to investigate this. Why won’t the President come forward with the evidence that would prove he didn’t stage these killings? Makes me wonder. </harryreid>
“’Staging’ and ‘taking an advantage of’ are two different things.”
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” - Rahm Emanuel
Fast & Furious was Staging
This proves what a lame amateur Obama is compared to Bush. Bush was able to take down the twin towers and blame it on the Muslims.
President Barack Obama: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,”
Well that’s just stupid. Forget Left or Right, this type of ignorance has no place in any reasonable discussion of, well . . .anything.
Haven’t read the whole thing, but what you quoted there is absolutely spot-on.
Too bad 1/2 the country is either too dumb or too blind to see because it’s absolutely serious business.
Tell that to the security officer that got shot yesterday simply because he worked in an establishment which like Chick-Fil_A is pro-family, pro-traditional marriage.
Agreed. But I don't think any of them expected to be tied to outright first degree murder, it's all secondary to them.
“Fast & furious” was staging?
“Fast & furious” WAS staging!
I dont approve of this any more than I approved of the Dixie Chicks yammering about Bush when they were overseas.
The only difference is the media does its best to make someone like the Dixie Chunks appear to be talking for all of the US or A.
While someone who may lean Right they do their best to make them appear to extremist/haters/intolerant/sexist/agist/racist/homophbes/greedy rich capitalist/knuckle draggers/flat earthers/gun crazed/outside the norm.
For examples see Sarah Palin or Tea Party or New Gingrich or anything Christian.
I believe the objective of Fast & Furious was that the murder rate by guns increase WITHIN the border of the United States. That way the democrats would show their crocodile tears on TV so that public opinion about guns can be manipulated so much that Obama would be forced to take some bold action against the right to bear arms in America.
Increasing the murder rate in Mexico would not be enough justification to ban guns in USA. In fact, if anything it would prove a need to secure the borders between the US and Mexico (something to Obama’s disadvantage - he’s an open borders guy).
Fast and Furious: the objective was that the guns come back into the United States and be responsible for murders in this country.
Increased murders in Mexico would have only been justification that our border need securing (something Obama would not want to be known).
In order for Fast and Furious to have been successful - our borders would have to be unsecured just like they are now.
Problem for the President is, he got caught.
“this type of ignorance has no place in any reasonable discussion of, well . . .anything.”
Is a show in Singapore a reasonable place?
Otherwise, I would say anyone has the right to say anything stupid, or otherwise, anywhere they want.
Likewise, anyone has the right to agree or disagree.
I have a problem with a media that is more of a propagandist arm of the democrat(ick) party pretending to be objective newsmen.
An old technique used by assassins is to convince a madman that the assassins’ target is the cause of all the madman’s problems. So the assassin himself is nowhere around when the assassination takes place.
However this is reliant on the “preexisting condition” of finding someone who is near to being insane or fanatical enough to be convinced to kill, as well as lots of time to convince the madman beyond any doubt.
Despite the Charles Bronson movie ‘Telefon’, the problem with drug induced hypnosis is that there is a rapid decay rate to the programming, and preexisting conditions tend to work against it.
Finally, imagine the Standard Distribution (”bell shaped”) curve of mental health in the US, think of what the average mental health of Americans is (including Democrats). By definition, *half* of Americans have worse mental health than that!
That is, ‘C-’ or lower mental health. And 17% of Americans have ‘D’ mental health, and a fairly substantial 5% have an ‘F’.
So Occam’s Razor, that the simplest solution is usually the correct one, likely means that the incompetents in the WH are not behind any mass killing sprees.
Well, that’s a completely sane and reasonable statement.
Keep on believing that, one of these days a conspiracy is going to sneak up and bite you on the butt!
It is possible to program people, all you have to do is find the right people. It should be obvious that the Obama camp has no moral considerations which would prevent such a plan from being used.
There's little need to program people to shoot stuff up. There are bad people all over the place. There are actually bigots out there that are stupid enough to shoot up a Sikh temple. There are nutters out there who delude themselves into thinking they are the Joker. There are nuts all over the place. There is no need for Obama to "program" them. When Mustaine say's this stuff he just makes our side look dopey. And that's too bad because I'd love to have a well spoken rock n roller on our side.
The timing of nutjob outbreaks is often just too good to be coincidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.