To: NormsRevenge
Environmentally friendly prototype???
For the toxic environments of Mars, Venus or Saturn?
Or just for testing on earth?
2 posted on
08/13/2012 9:06:06 PM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
Before..
NASA's Morpheus lander prototype and the new hazard field at Kennedy Space Center in Florida are seen in this view. Image released August 2, 2012.
After..
NASA's Morpheus lander prototype in flames during a failed free flight test at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla., on Aug. 9, 2012.
3 posted on
08/13/2012 9:07:45 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi)
To: NormsRevenge
Pathetic beyond belief...”green” rocket fuel that doesn’t pack much energy per pound, all in the name of not polluting some distant rock. People at NASA are now certifiably insane. Shut them down and start over.
To: NormsRevenge
Did We pay for that Hot dog Cooker?
5 posted on
08/13/2012 9:11:39 PM PDT by
Musketeer
To: NormsRevenge
NASA's 'green' planetary test lander crashes (Morpheus - cheap, environmentally friendly prototype)
Old School is the best school.
6 posted on
08/13/2012 9:15:13 PM PDT by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: NormsRevenge
I actually don't mind them working with methane, since it is a major component of useable fuel off the earth. NASA is very skilled at public relations, so of course they are going to market it as "green."
The bad part about this is there are private companies making equipment like this, and I have seen videos of them not exploding. Why doesn't NASA just buy those?
To: NormsRevenge
keep trying
To: NormsRevenge
Obviously, since it has to be “environmentally friendly”, they must intend to use this “lander” to explore some place on Earth. I might suggest they just tow it out to the site on a trailer pulled behind a Volt or Prius.
13 posted on
08/13/2012 9:46:22 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(You win some, you lose some and some you don't suit up for.)
To: NormsRevenge
Is the crash a product of NASA’s new focus? That is, Muslim outreach?
To: NormsRevenge
The crash may not have anything to do with the type of fuel used. Don’t forget, there are many such explosions during the testing phase of any new vehicle. That’s why they test them
16 posted on
08/13/2012 10:10:07 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: NormsRevenge
It was a mudslime outreach prototype.
It blowed up real good!
17 posted on
08/13/2012 10:12:56 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
To: NormsRevenge
You would think NASA would have learned its lesson when the agency used “green” foam on the Columbia space shuttle and murdered seven astronauts.
To: NormsRevenge
I knew it.
I always thought Laurence Fishburne couldn’t fly, now, finally, proof.
20 posted on
08/13/2012 10:23:29 PM PDT by
waus
(FUBO UFCMF, Just in case I stuttered, FUBO)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson