Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
I actually don't mind them working with methane, since it is a major component of useable fuel off the earth. NASA is very skilled at public relations, so of course they are going to market it as "green."

The bad part about this is there are private companies making equipment like this, and I have seen videos of them not exploding. Why doesn't NASA just buy those?

7 posted on 08/13/2012 9:17:53 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vince Ferrer

It seems they had a bunch of parts laying around and opted to do it themselves, unfortunately poooof.

Harvesting space for raw materials is a good idea and a necessity as we won’t be able to take much with resource-wise.


10 posted on 08/13/2012 9:31:26 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

NASA kept insisting that the foam peeling off the external fuel tank had nothing to do with them changing the formula to make it more “environmentally friendly”.

I never believed them.


18 posted on 08/13/2012 10:15:51 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Vince Ferrer

If NASA bought “off-the-shelf” from the private market, then why do we need a NASA? That’s what they think. They’re not stupid; they’re rocket scientists.


34 posted on 08/14/2012 4:09:55 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson