Exclusive: TheBlaze Interviews the Guy Fired for Berating a Chick-fil-A Employee

The Blaze ^ | Aug. 3, 2012 | Mike Opelka

[StAnDeliver]

So, unbelievably, the creep is actually alleging a different YouTube video compelled him to do what he did -- trying to paint himself as the victim. When combined with the video itself, that looks a lot like Narcissistic/Histrionic Personality Disorder. Probably not helped by his paranoia, the whole 'they're out to get me' lame Stormfront ruse in The Blaze interview, simply to deflect from his abuse of that CFA employee. That video was reposted by dozens of YT users.

And just the idea that he went back to El Con CFA and asked to see Rachel! Ban that dude from the whole chain post-haste.

Now, down to the nitty-gritty, I posted yesterday that 'if you google his YT name Amsmith77Amsmith, the google cache 'ghost' picture will show you the 6 most recent YT titles he suscribed to, the most recent one (before he deleted as much as he could lol): It's Not About Chicken

Which interestingly is not the YT vid that Smith alleges made him do what he did, BUT is by the same YT user, this odd young woman JacksonPearce. So it's fair to say he watched the vid he refers to.

She's an simple-minded, cut-out macguffin in this, though. "Sad to see Adam Smith WAS filming a response to my video-- he was being a jerk and I admire Rachel for maintaining her cool." -- @ JacksonPearce yada yada yada.

Back to Smith. "He claimed that this was the first video he ever posted on YouTube. He later walked that statement back saying that he had only posted a few personal family videos, but nothing of a political or protest nature". You betcha he walked back that statement, because he wasn't fast enough deleting all his vids, one of which was titled:

Man Carries Cross Up Mountain on Good Friday

Drove by this guy on Good Friday and had to stop to ask where this guy was coming from. My iPhone ran out of disk

You can watch it, because another YT user posted it.

BTW, Smith himself just posted an Apologies and Clarifications.

"I couldn't believe the number of people that came out to support the corporation..."

Believe it! Wow, he's attacking his own ex-employer Vante! You're not getting your job back, douchelord.

[Ronin]

Gee, is the Blaze going to interview the parents of the six-year-old who has been threatened with death, wished on pederasts, etc. for posting 10 reasons he doesn’t like Obama?

This putz needs to suck up and put a sock in it.

He dug this hole all on his own.

[smoothsailing]

Smith has posted an “apology” video on Youtube...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmP9Shki6_I&feature=plcp

He still doesn’t get it, he thinks it’s all about him.

He’s as douchey as they come. Yuck.

[coloradan]

Should someone be fired from their job and threatened with violence, torture, even death because they have an opinion different than yours? Of course not. And yet, that is what Adam M. Smith of Arizona says happened to him.

Nobody gives a flying leap what his opinions are. But he unleashed a storm of verbal abuse against an innocent, minimum wage worker over something she didn't do. *That's* why he was fired, etc.

[doc1019]

Amen.

[SECURE AMERICA]

Should someone be fired from their job and threatened with violence, torture, even death because they have an opinion different than yours? Of course not.

Well first lets get the facts straight.
He was not fired for his opinion. He was fired for verbally harrassing a young women, intimadation and being stupid enough to post it on youtube. Most companies have a clause for execs about bad public behavior that can cause trouble for the company. So YES he should have been fired. As to the rest. People must begin to understand that their actions can have consequences. If you act like an asshole you will be treated like one. If you are beligerent and threatening you will be threatened back and people will be beligerent towards you.

[The KG9 Kid]

"... Believe it! Wow, he's attacking his own ex-employer Vante! You're not getting your job back, douchelord.

Nope. In fact, I would expect that if he shows up on or unreasonably near to Vante premises again without written permission, it becomes a police matter.

[StAnDeliver]

Well, and as his 'Apology' video confirms, he did it on company time, as I suspected all along.

[tennmountainman]

This moron is only trying to play the victim, so he can get
another job and won’t have to stand in a soup line.

I watched the video. What a moron.
It will be interesting to see where he ends up.
I am certain some gay based company will give him a job.
May he will learn a valuable lesson from this.
He does have a wife and kids. Maybe he will think about
the position he has put his family in, before he runs his
mouth again.

[Baynative]

I’ll bet he’s a quick hire at Progressive Insurance, Ben and Jerry’s, or maybe HuffPo.

[StAnDeliver]

The comments on his 'Apology' video are awesome. It reminds me of Good Morning, Vietnam, when Sgt. Dreiwitz is reading comments about Lt. Hauk's DJing.

This response to his video has the most thumbs up votes currently:

You're a insignificant piece of sh(t. Your employer did the correct thing when they decided to let you go. You're a liability to your former employer's corporate core values, policies and their clients. You're not apologizing for your childish behavior during your rant, you are apologizing because you have NO other choice but to show some humility in order to gain acceptance. For your well being, I sincerely hope this teach you a lesson in how to be an adult and not let your emotions run amok.

[tennmountainman]

Don’t forget Men’s Warehouse, that Obama supporting owner.

[Thorliveshere]

He’s entitled to his opinion. He just should have been fired for being a jerk.

[tennmountainman]

I am kind of surprised he did not mention his family.
And apologize to them. He put his selfish desire to run his mouth over supporting the needs of his family.
He will find a job. But I want to know where he ends up, so
I can express my first admendment right to NOT buy that companies product.

[Berlin_Freeper]

OMG when is that crazy man going to stop harrassing that poor girl?

[Tex-Con-Man]

There’s been a lot of speculation about Rachel’s reaction and what was going on in her head when this D-Bag was ranting. I think the fact that she refused to meet the suddenly unemployed dickhead is an indication that she really internalized some of his anger. She’s not over it. He did some damage. What an ass of monumental proportions.

And his apology is just making things worse...he’s trying to justify his behaviour by blaming all the chikin’ eatin’ supporters of homo-hate for his butthurt.

[Secret Agent Man]

I have little sympathy for a liberal thug bully who got it back in spades.

[Secret Agent Man]

Human Rights Campaign - homosexual/homosexualist litigious group - future hire.

[Oztrich Boy]

Smith said he doesn’t not have legal counsel and thus has “no idea

I don't understand that sentence either.

[StAnDeliver]

"This moron is only trying to play the victim, so he can get another job and won’t have to stand in a soup line. I watched the video. What a moron. It will be interesting to see where he ends up. I am certain some gay based company will give him a job."

Yeah, it's definitely an audition tape. But no one is going to hire anyone who publicizes their anger management issues.

In the Cross Up Mountain video, he talks about having been an atheist for a year. So he's a typical newly-minted crackpot Dawkinist, but I think atheism has really done a number on this moron (as it has so many others). And now he has to double-down on being a puke, otherwise he'd have to acknowledge that separating himself from God's love has an internal price -- and his mouth just wrote a check for that price that his ass can't cash.