Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush skipping Republican National Convention
Politico ^ | July 20th, 2012 | Johnathan Martin

Posted on 07/20/2012 4:37:25 PM PDT by KantianBurke

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: KantianBurke

GWB paved the way for Obama; without GWB, there may have been no Obama.


121 posted on 07/20/2012 8:45:10 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

My VP choice is the same as my presidential choice, Rick Santorum. But just not having Condi or Jebbie will be a victory of sorts.


122 posted on 07/20/2012 8:47:39 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

Comment #123 Removed by Moderator

Comment #124 Removed by Moderator

To: montag813

Montag813 just articulated my exact thinking!!!!


125 posted on 07/20/2012 8:53:51 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: livius

No, Roberts preceded Miers. The “Miers seat” went to Alito, whose mother said Alito is “pro-life.”


126 posted on 07/20/2012 8:57:31 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.; montaine; KantianBurke

You realize, I hope, that Rick Santorum was regularly and routinely criticized here by the regular posters for not being a “true conservative”. I’m sure you missed all of that, or you vigorously defended Rick.

I find it so odd here....a question is asked to one poster, another poster who hasnt posted for quite a while answers....the question posed to that poster is answered by someone else....

I’m also noticing that most threads are taken over by the same core group of posters. I guess that’s what all of you want.


127 posted on 07/20/2012 8:58:52 PM PDT by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Also,”We have to abandon the free market,in order to save the free market”. “Islam is a religion of peace”. John Roberts. Not ever backing the Marines in Haditha,who were falsely accused of war crimes. Sending the Military to Iraq and after our brave troops won an outstanding victory,immediately squandered it with insane rules of engagement and trying to win the heart’s and minds of islamic savage beasts. Hiring Condi Rice as Secretary of State,who was an accolyte of Madeline Albright’s father and who in George W.Bush’s second term,conducted an even more liberal foreign policy than Madeline Albright. The just revealed USDA outreach program with mexico,that made it easier for illegals to get food stamps and help bankrupt our Country.


128 posted on 07/20/2012 8:58:52 PM PDT by mark1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

I know Santorum won’t be the VP pick, but I think he would be the most helpful. I am just hoping it is not Condi, who won’t add a vote to the ticket except maybe her own.


129 posted on 07/20/2012 9:02:23 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

bush is the reason we have the fuzznasty in the whitehut now.He did nothing to stand up to the left.Good riddance to him and his ilk.


130 posted on 07/20/2012 10:12:40 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
It was also announced last week that Bush 41, GHW Bush, will not attend.

He says it's too difficult for him to get around now at 88 yrs old.

131 posted on 07/20/2012 10:38:07 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Pontius Pilate 'voters' are arrogant, delusional, lilly-livered collaborators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

Why should he attend? He’s not running for office. If he were there, the media would be all about him, and that would take away from Romney and his running mate.


132 posted on 07/20/2012 10:57:42 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

‘I despise his brother.’

Neil or Marvin?


133 posted on 07/21/2012 12:15:04 AM PDT by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I’ve met President Bush. He is not an idiot.


134 posted on 07/21/2012 12:24:35 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

I’ve met Donald Rumsfeld and admire him very much.


135 posted on 07/21/2012 12:28:01 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Still stuck, eh? Get a clue, if W could run for president again, he would still win. I only see one "dope" here...

We didn't get Obama because of W, but because of a leftist MSM & a weak candidate named McCain.

136 posted on 07/21/2012 12:28:33 AM PDT by Left2Right (Starve the Beast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Re: “The harm he inflicted”

Add Chief Justice John Roberts to this steadily growing list.


137 posted on 07/21/2012 12:36:16 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vision

‘Hello American sailor...Hello Freedom Man.’
—Ronald Reagan Farewell Adress to the Nation January 11,1989.

When I looked at your homepage, the screen was a little blurry.

KUDOS.


138 posted on 07/21/2012 12:47:47 AM PDT by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
The harm he inflicted on our country will take a long time to heal from.

You talking policy or politics? Exactly which harm are you referring to?

139 posted on 07/21/2012 1:17:03 AM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karnage
I’ve met Donald Rumsfeld and admire him very much.

There is something a lot of people seem to forget. I enlisted active duty in the Fall of 1976. I got to my ship by mid February 77. I saw then the walk away military. If you wanted out of your enlistment {keep in mind this was volunteer military non draft} you went AWOL 31 days and turned yourself into another command. From that point you would be processed out with a less than Honorable type of Discharge.

Our daily command AWOL list which I saw usually daily ranged about 50 or so. These were not guys who were late for Muster these were guys gone for days & most had no intention of coming back. I ran into quite a few persons after I got out who did just that with persons I worked with since I got out. Didn't Rummy try too or bring up making that a policy again under his Bush tenure? I think I remember him wanting to start that destructive policy up again his second tenure. The military was a wreck in the mid 1970's up - about early 1980.

I do find this odd though. During my four years we made all our called upon light offs and getting underway orders, passed all readiness inspections, drills, operations, and evaluations. Sure we had major problems including parts shortages but the ships stayed mission ready.

My late uncle was a retired Commander who Captained a Navy Gator Freighter about a decade before I enlisted. At some point after 9/11 I was visiting him and we talked about the Kitty Hawk and Kennedy flunking Evals and not being able to get underway. He asked me "How can they Flunk those evaluations and inspections? The Navy won't allow you to flunk them." That is what Rummy never grasped. He never grasped the military can not be ran except by military rules with a military mission and policies.

The 9/11 attacks happened eight months into the Bush term. At that point it was the duty of Secretary of Defense and SECNAV to know the status of the United States Navy including the operation status and issues of each key ship. That information was sent too The Pentagon daily in SIT-REPS. If a Boiler was unable to operate The Pentagon knew it. If the ship was too hot in the electronic rooms due to air conditioning plants being inoperable The Pentagon knew it. I did a short stint in what was called The Log Room and saw those type of reports. The Kitty Hawk and Kennedy were asked to get underway and surprise, surprise, surprise?? I'm not buying that. Those ships had FLAG Officers meaning an Admiral assigned to them besides the Captain who was the Commanding Officer. Was it not just the Captains who paid for it though? Flag Stars should have came off and SECNAV's job lost as well. Things seem to be steady as she goes in the early Bush term one with more Clinton policies till the crapola hit the blades on the morning of 9/11.

Our military in the Post Reagan years has been treated like a government mule being worked hard and put up wet. Not one POTUS in either party has stood up for our troops. None of them have. Bush missed a perfect Reagan opportunity at 9/11. Men were beating down the door at recruiting centers to go kick some Islamic butt and what happened? NOTHING!!!Bush had a two house majority and did squat with it.

Reagan used economic opportunity to build up our military strength. Let's take the recession in Reagan's first term as an example. During Carter's entire term numbers were short on active duty. By the Fall of 1982 under Reagan all if not most critical billets in the Navy were filled. I know because I had been out for two years and considered going back in to support my family due to no jobs available. In 1980 the going rate to get a Snipe to re-up was $15K and next rank.

When 9/11 happened Bush did not use a golden opportunity to increase and rebuild our military strength but rather took us into war with 1996 End Troop Strengths and stayed there with no substantial increase in manpower. That is not rebuilding a military that is running an undermanned one ragged.

I'll tell you one better. Under which POTUS do you think the United States Navy hit the lowest number of ships since 1930? I've give you a clue his Dad really was born in the United States and was POTUS himself. Nope not even the numbers of Active Duty Ships are as low even now. The end of Clinton's term had us at 318 ships active duty. The 2007 number of GW Bush's term put us at 278. 153 were ships taken out of commission under Clinton and under six years of it happened with a two house GOP Majority. Under Poppy Bush we had 121 decommissioned and not replaced. These are not numbers I invented I got them from here. http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/org9-4.htm

140 posted on 07/21/2012 2:18:37 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson