1 posted on
07/13/2012 6:49:50 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: NoLibZone
2 posted on
07/13/2012 6:51:24 PM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: NoLibZone
Well, Palin just went down a notch in my book. The VP should directly reflect the thoughts and policy of the president as far as I’m concerned.
3 posted on
07/13/2012 6:52:26 PM PDT by
albie
To: NoLibZone
4 posted on
07/13/2012 6:52:53 PM PDT by
surroundedbyblue
(Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
To: NoLibZone
I don’t often disagree with anything Palin says, but on this one I must. To think that killing babies is OK, cannot be forgiven.
5 posted on
07/13/2012 6:53:06 PM PDT by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: NoLibZone
I agree with SP. It is *other* things that IMO “disqualify” Condi. And I wouldn’t use the word “disqualify”, because in the 0bama/Maxine Waters/Joe Biden era of political buffoonery, the very concept of “qualifications” really does not exist.
6 posted on
07/13/2012 6:54:32 PM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(Instead of running for another term, 0bama should be begging for forgiveness.)
To: NoLibZone
Palin says Rice's view on abortion shouldn't disqualify her as VP Of course not because it has nothing to do with being 'conservative'. She is African American and by God that is what the GOP needs. To 'reach out'.
To: NoLibZone
I don’t think she wants to run BUT... what if she was the vp and in 8 years she was running for prez. What would Sarah say then? I don’t think i could vote in the election if she were the vp pick. except for the congress.
In my opinion the dems are wicked but the reps are stupid.
9 posted on
07/13/2012 6:56:30 PM PDT by
LookingUp
To: NoLibZone
10 posted on
07/13/2012 6:56:30 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: NoLibZone
I disagree. Also if Rice voted for Obama, why would anyone want her as a candidate?
11 posted on
07/13/2012 6:57:33 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: NoLibZone
Sorry. I refuse to even vote for a local school board candidate who isn’t pro-life. A person’s fundamental valuing of life permeates all other attitudes and decisions.
12 posted on
07/13/2012 6:58:03 PM PDT by
Faith
To: NoLibZone
14 posted on
07/13/2012 6:59:55 PM PDT by
GBA
(To understand what is happening to America and why, read The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn)
To: NoLibZone
Sarah Palin: We need to remember, though, that its not the vice president that would legislate abortion and that would be Congresss role, and well keep that in mind.
And what happens if President Romney dies in office, and Condi Rice becomes President?
Here's what happens: if Congress should pass some pro-abortion legislation, 'President Rice' will have no problem signing it. Sarah should be asking Condi Rice how her opinion on abortion would have factored in if it had been the former piano-playing Secretary of State that had been carrying Trig for 9 months.
God bless Sarah Palin for choosing life.
But what would Condi have done in similar circumstances?
17 posted on
07/13/2012 7:07:39 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
To: NoLibZone
Another one bites the dust. I think Rush said something equally idiotic today.
18 posted on
07/13/2012 7:08:46 PM PDT by
bramps
To: NoLibZone
Sarah is correct. While I disagree on the subject, I do not vote based on a single issue.
19 posted on
07/13/2012 7:09:50 PM PDT by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts bolt the Constitution together as the loose screws of the Left fall out!)
To: NoLibZone
I think Palin understands there will never be a law that ends the murder of the unborn. To accomplish that a society has to be prosperous. Prosperity is how you end crime. Prosperity is how you enrich a culture. That's how. Stamping ones feet accomplishes nothing. Calling the 'impure' murderers does nothing other than ensure the continuance of dead babies. Me? I want every fertilized egg to have its three score and ten. Or twenty if by way of health.
|
22 posted on
07/13/2012 7:11:04 PM PDT by
I see my hands
(It's time to.. KICK OUT THE JAMS, MOTHER FREEPERS!)
To: NoLibZone
Never put your faith in the man. Put your faith in their ideas, but never in the man. The man ( or woman in this case) will ALWAYS disappoint you.
23 posted on
07/13/2012 7:13:14 PM PDT by
vmivol00
(I won't be reconstructed.)
To: NoLibZone
Palin is wrong again!
She needs to stop supporting ALL females, no matter what!!!
24 posted on
07/13/2012 7:14:17 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
(No more RINOS!)
To: NoLibZone
Myth and Condi are both RINOs...
25 posted on
07/13/2012 7:15:24 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: NoLibZone
FReepers reading this thread should note that the headline to the article on The Hill is misleading and does not reflect Palin’s views accurately, as expressed in her TV interview referenced. A search of NoLibZone’s past posts will reveal a clearer image of the attitude toward Palin. It is not neutral. Here’s another excerpt from Ms. Cohn’s article:
I would certainly prefer a presidential and vice presidential candidate who had that respect for all innocent precious purposeful human life, Palin said. We need to remember, though, that its not the vice president that would legislate abortion and that would be Congresss role, and well keep that in mind.
I’m kind of surprised at the posts on this thread as if winning the White House is more important than stopping the genocide of the unborn. No thanks.
27 posted on
07/13/2012 7:16:24 PM PDT by
LouAvul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson