Some bro found out a fellow officer (cracker) was
gonna vote R
It’s the ones who don’t say it that you have to worry about.
Could this finally be the crazed right-winger they have been waiting for???
Although, we will probably learn this guy is a democrat.
“...said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to give details of the investigation”.
“It was not immediately clear where the alleged conversation took place or exactly how many officers took part in the conversation”.
“It was not immediately clear what type of firearm was allegedly shown”.
“Police officials declined to identify the officer. Officials from the U.S. Attorney’s office declined comment”.
” police union chief Kristopher Baumann said he did not have details on the matter”.
” A Secret Service spokesman declined to provide further details...”
Very informative story. at least you got it out first, thats all that really matters.
Trial balloon to judge sympathy. The REAL false-flag is coming.
False flap operation looking for the sympathy and outrage vote. Not even a chance there is any real truth in this.
Although talking about the first family is such a way isn’t cool, saying you’d like to do something is not the same as a threat. For an example, for me to say I would like to jump a woman’s bones - is not the same as threatening to do it.
...and yet you can scream for Jihad against the American people and Michelle will invite you to parties at the White House.......
It’s amazing what a lot of makeup can do, drudge.
I’m guessing she threatened to take away his donut breaks.
And he just snapped.
So I guess we’ve tried everything, now we go for the sympathy vote......
Yeah, I’m cynical!
This is just wrong! Did that officer not know that in several states it is illegal to hunt or kill a Sasquatch!
BS; Red Herring to take away from economy.
They’ll somehow be very willing to protect this officer’s identity, because he doesn’t exist.
I want a NAME and a FACE.......I DOUBT this is a right wing white guy!! Hey REPORTERS....MORE INFO, PLEASE!!
The alleged “threat”:
“Shoot a wookie? Why I’d use a rifle. Here I have a photo of it.”
If there was any truth to this, why would he be placed on administrative duty? Wouldn’t he be relieved of all duties while being investigated?
Hmmm...
This morning while sipping my coffee and add some new tin foil to my helmet, I thought about this scenario played out. If someone were to harm the first lady, it would accomplish several goals of this administration. Primarily, it would distract from from his record and the state of the union. It would also garner him a lot of sympathy and allow him great latitude by much of the public. “You’d grab guns too, if your wife had been shot”... et al. For these reasons, she should watch her supposed trusted friends. Does anyone doubt that such sacrifices would be made for the “greater good”? Maybe I’m just cynical, but I don’t put anything past them.
If he DID say something to this effect out loud, he’s a dumbass.
And that’s a big “if”. I’m calling bullsh*t on this one - another media-inspired distraction to take the attention off the economy and the dismal job their golden boy is doing.