Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are We Being Too Hard On John Roberts?
CE.com ^ | July 5th, 2012 | Ken Connor

Posted on 07/05/2012 7:14:59 PM PDT by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: Salvation

This article nails it!! We are being to harsh on Johnny. After all, one must not beat up on the mentally handicapped.


21 posted on 07/05/2012 7:27:42 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Who knows, he might have gotten a call from some people from Chicago.


22 posted on 07/05/2012 7:27:42 PM PDT by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

American Pluralism is the end of America. Anerica gave itself over to satan in Roe V Wade .
It’s finished ,dear sister!


23 posted on 07/05/2012 7:27:51 PM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
It seems that there is a coordinated effort underway by certain people who are trying to either defend or rehabilitate Roberts.

Yes, it is really quite obvious. The shills and the water-carriers are so inept, they can't even mask the fact that they have embarked on an obvious campaign.

24 posted on 07/05/2012 7:28:09 PM PDT by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Roberts is not guilty of the perfidy of which you accuse him and he has given us a great gift for the coming election.”

What utter pablum. What an utter insult to our intelligence.

This writer is arrogant in his attempt to push phoney c*rap down out throats.

Mark Levin carefully went through this entire ruling and stated that it is very destructive to our United States Constitution and to our Liberties.

I agree with Levin that there is no silver-lining.

Some many of these disgusting, weak minded so called Conservatives are coming our all over the place to defend Roberts. They are all NUTS!

Robert's decision will haunt our Republic for decades. Nothing about Roberts warrants offering him any respect or consideration.

Robert willfully and knowingly made a decision that he clearly knows will unleash great evils upon the citizens of our Republic.

25 posted on 07/05/2012 7:28:18 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Hey Ken... FU


26 posted on 07/05/2012 7:28:30 PM PDT by dps.inspect (rage against the Obama machine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

This article makes me feel like a black man being told to stay on the Democrat plantation. He’s telling conservatives to stay on the Rino plantation.


27 posted on 07/05/2012 7:28:35 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

No. I’d spit in his stupid moon face if I could.


28 posted on 07/05/2012 7:28:50 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Actually, we are not being hard enough.


29 posted on 07/05/2012 7:29:02 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi

“Should read America gave itself to satan”


30 posted on 07/05/2012 7:29:18 PM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Ken Conner

He is also Chairman of the Center for a Just Society

Leftist Moron.


31 posted on 07/05/2012 7:29:18 PM PDT by LtKerst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

That’s a disgusting analogy.

But at least you didn’t put one of your stupid boxes around it.


32 posted on 07/05/2012 7:29:29 PM PDT by workerbee (June 28, 2012 -- 9/11 From Within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

He is a hard on.


33 posted on 07/05/2012 7:29:54 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

What he has done is choose to abdicate his responsibility to uphold The Constitution in hopes of earning a pat on the head from media types.

When he repents, retires and starts actively working to repair the damage done by his betrayal of The Constitution, then he can start earning a chance at redemption and eventual forgiveness.

Until then, he can drop dead and I’ll shed no tears.


34 posted on 07/05/2012 7:30:55 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (With (R)epublicans like these, who needs (D)emocrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi
American Pluralism is the end of America. Anerica gave itself over to satan in Roe V Wade . It’s finished ,dear sister!

As ugly and diabolical as Roe v Wade was and is, my love of this country compels me to believe that there remains a path to redemption for our people.

But that path does not run through either Obama or Romney. Both must be rejected.

35 posted on 07/05/2012 7:31:05 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Are We Being Too Hard On John Roberts?

We haven't even begun.

This is the most despicable bench-legislation since the genocidal Roe v. Wade.

And I don't need a Breck Girl to tell me different.

36 posted on 07/05/2012 7:31:05 PM PDT by Old Sarge (We are now officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
when the case was not argued by the Obama’s lawyers in that way

Actually they did argue that on a secondary level.

37 posted on 07/05/2012 7:31:44 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Bain Capital would not have bought into Solyndra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
I fail to understand how Roberts could decide that the “Personal Mandate” is a tax when the case was not argued by the Obama’s lawyers in that way.

Judicial Activism.

Oh, wait, protecting citizens from crazed legislators and an imperial executive branch is what Roberts considers judicial activism.

38 posted on 07/05/2012 7:32:26 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Not. Even. Close.


39 posted on 07/05/2012 7:33:45 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Wait a minute. Is this a deal where you cannot criticize a Roman Catholic? I couldn’t care less what his religion is.

His fellow Catholics on the bench said he’s nuts.


40 posted on 07/05/2012 7:34:00 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson