Posted on 07/01/2012 10:47:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
Just about anything & everything will be ‘included’ in Healthcare coverage.
Mental health — for example, many goofy leftist psychologists will start issuing “objective research” showing that ‘depression is caused by not having money & nice things.” We need to give them stuff, to “alleviate mental illness.”
How about THIS “psychology study” — one showing that the ‘disincentive’ provided by the 2nd Amendment: a shotgun pointed in your face by an angry home owner, will ‘cause’ you to be less “depressed” about having nice things, and MORE Depressed about DEATH — and INSTEAD be Motivated to WORK!!!!!
Where’s THAT study?
We’ll never see it (except from John Lott)...
Folks, we are in for major Nork-style socialism if this isn’t STOPPED.
And that doesn't bode well for getting this monstrosity repealed. The left will isolate a few pubbies and threaten them, and especially any dems thinking of joining. We are in a war with an enemy that has no morals, only political goals. They truly are nazi/commies.
It is going to be one helluva ride next November. Hang on!
Just about anything & everything will be included in Healthcare coverage.
Including what you eat and drink, gun ownership, religious and sexual preferences, membership in unapproved organizations.... the list goes on.
Think of how many things the AMA and the CDC and the Surgeon General have weighed in on.
that is beautiful!!!!( pic w/ holder)
Thank you
Well, the Supreme Court is one place where you would never expect to get a “named source”, at least not until well after the fact.
I got married here in Vegas in 1985 (long before I came to live here)
We flew up from So Cal to do it. Playing craps and losing big, on a spastic hunch I threw $50.00 on the hard twelve.
SOB if it didn't hit, paid 32 to 1
Point is, it was a sucker bet.
Fact is, I won...but anyone who gambles on the dice table will tell you it is a foolish bet.
OTOH, if I didn't bet, I never would have won.
Tough choice this time around for sure.
BTW, that is a true story....and don't ask how the marriage turned out!
If he was really threatened, and has any principles left, then we should see him step down as soon as a Republican president takes office. After all, he would have to know that he has been compromised and cannot reliably fulfill his oath of office anymore. If he doesn’t step down, then he either wasn’t threatened, or doesn’t have any principles.
Right. The phoney “Psych-mental health studies” will come fast & furious. A real pseudo-science, psychologists will open the door wide to intervention, wealth transfers.
“If he doesnt step down, then he either wasnt threatened, or doesnt have any principles.”
It’s probably both — threatened and unprincipled. A principled person, even if threatened, would have done the right thing. Look at all our Founding Fathers sacrificed in order to do the right thing.
This guy’s a weasel.
Clinton is seriously disturbed that he was impeached, even if the Senate caved.
If Roberts is concerned about what the silly New York Times thinks about him, he sure is going to driven nuts about being impeached.
Senate conviction or not.
Let the impeachments begin.
It is ironic that Malta is an historic symbol of resolute resistance overcoming seemingly overwhelming evil. How can Roberts bear to be among the graves of those brave knights?
"IT IS A TAX"!
Did he report any threats to the FBI?
Not quite true.
Quote from below link: "-- For all the awkward, nervous or frog-in-their-throats public speakers just having a bad day, there's hope. The Supreme Court's decision to uphold the health care law, despite widespread criticism of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli's performance in the courtroom, proves that oral arguments are less about putting on a good show than making viable points and that, more significantly, oral arguments aren't always what seals the deal. Verrilli did, in fact, argue the mandate as a tax, but Roberts's endorsement of this argument reminds us that votes are cast and opinions are written based on much more than courtroom crossfire. Perhaps there's a reason the high court is one of the last venues in American politics still averse to live recordings and modern media technology."
What We Learned: The Tax Argument Cometh
I think it’s a good guess that Robert’s fell for the whole: the court looks to right-wing crap that the left was talking about all spring. We’ve been in trouble in this country fo a long time....this is just another slap in the face. It seems the public just never wakes up.
The decision is an unmitigated disaster for us all.
***I’d be willing to wager more than a couple of boxes of popsicles that Kagan was the leaker***
Of course she was, since she was Solicitor General when the law was passed and then refused to recuse herself. She had a vested interest in seeing it upheld. For liberals, the end justifies the means. So much corruption on so many levels!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.