Couldn't happen to a nicer group...
To: Behind Liberal Lines
You read stories of embezzlements like this and wonder how they ever went unnoticed. In this case it was a nefarious organization, but it happens to regular businesses too.
2 posted on
06/29/2012 10:34:36 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
How dare she steal valuable charitable funds that would have otherwise been put to good use in slaughtering babies?
PS. What sort of low order scum leftist freak donates their charitable funds to NARAL anyway?
3 posted on
06/29/2012 10:48:29 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Yes but was she pro choicing her legal option to collect those additional funds from NARAL as a penalty or a tax?
Chief Justice Rob US will be happy to take the case.
4 posted on
06/29/2012 10:55:51 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Interesting to read that she has children. I’m surprised she didn’t lead by example and abort them all. Probably just another Liberal hypocrite...
5 posted on
06/29/2012 10:56:16 PM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(Greed + Envy = Liberalism)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
accuses former NARAL Pro-Choice New York president Kelli Conlin of using more than $250,000 in charity funds during her tenure to for her own benefit, despite a compensation package that reached $380,000 in 2010. Well then, in ObamaSpeak making $380/k puts her in the 1% evil rich category. Will she be made to pay her 'fair share' or does she get the Bam opt out waiver?
7 posted on
06/29/2012 11:02:01 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I’m surprised at this.
One would think that someone who advocates the wholesale killing of babies would be more virtuous.
8 posted on
06/29/2012 11:51:57 PM PDT by
AAABEST
(Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Guess she's pro-choice on stealing.
10 posted on
06/30/2012 1:59:54 AM PDT by
utahagen
To: Behind Liberal Lines
If you are willing to kill babies then stealing would hardly seem to be a crime of any consequence.
12 posted on
06/30/2012 3:14:19 AM PDT by
Anvilhead
(Why do we elect politicians when the desire for the job disqualifies you for it?)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
What “charity”? NARAL? NARAL is a charity? In what warped, ass-backward, upside-down evil empire is NARAL a “charity”?
To: Behind Liberal Lines
No pic in the article, I take it she is Amish
16 posted on
06/30/2012 5:27:18 AM PDT by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson