Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orange1998

She was the lookout for the criminals, and that’s okay? Interesting.


18 posted on 06/26/2012 5:15:09 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LearsFool
She was the lookout for the criminals, and that’s okay?

I'm okay with that. In what way is it a crime for a citizen to warn other citizens to slow down?

25 posted on 06/26/2012 5:28:18 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Voting for mitt or obie is like throwing your country away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool
She was the lookout for the criminals, and that’s okay?

What criminals?

27 posted on 06/26/2012 5:29:23 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool

Kinda’ loose on who you call a “criminal” aren’t ya’?


35 posted on 06/26/2012 5:40:31 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool

No she was arrested by the criminals who were denying her her first amendment rights to communicate with other citizens about government activity. The cops (again) are the criminals


46 posted on 06/26/2012 6:06:00 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Legalize Freedom!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool
She was the lookout for the criminals, and that’s okay? Interesting.

Criminals?

Since when is doing 35 in a 30 a "Crime". She was encouraging the public to slow down and obey the law.

How can someone with the fascist attitude you have about traffic laws consider yourself a Freeper?

54 posted on 06/26/2012 6:56:13 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Virgil Goode! Because everyone else is Bad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool
"She was the lookout for the criminals, and that’s okay? Interesting."

Well, at least you are aware of your problem (judging by your screen name).

66 posted on 06/26/2012 8:27:53 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Je t'aime, faire du bruit comme le cochon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool
She was the lookout for the criminals, and that’s okay? Interesting.

No, you see if what she did was illegal (Obstruction of Justice): saying there's some legal consequence for doing something, then that means all legal education is Obstruction of Justice.

It means busting your little brother and smacking some sense into him when he starts playing with marijuana is Obstruction of Justice.

In short, everyone who says that there could be [legal] consequences becomes, under such a policy, an obstructor of justice. But hey, this is great because Ignorance of The Law Is No Excuse.

So you're a criminal if you were told the law, and not being told the law is itself not a mitigating factor.

77 posted on 06/30/2012 6:43:29 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson