Skip to comments.
White House A Sore Winner On Arizona Ruling
Investor's Business Daily ^
| 25 June 2012
| Editorial
Posted on 06/26/2012 10:23:48 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Obviously, the part that was upheld stung them bigtime.
To: IBD editorial writer
After this nonsense, I, for one will have NO problem What-so-ever spiking the football if the health debacle is struck down.
2
posted on
06/26/2012 10:27:51 AM PDT
by
madison10
To: IBD editorial writer
To: madison10
I never had a problem with so doing. ;-)
4
posted on
06/26/2012 10:33:19 AM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: madison10
The POS president is such an egomanic he cannot abide by anyone challenging him.
I hope that bum goes down in flames this november. In fact, if he loses, I expect to go to DC on the 20th of Jan just to say good bye and good riddance to him, in loud terms.
5
posted on
06/26/2012 10:33:32 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
To: madison10
After this nonsense, I, for one have my more serious doubts that the courts will strike down the health debacle.
Yesterday's decision just does not make sense to me.
6
posted on
06/26/2012 10:35:19 AM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(Should Obama recuse himself from making any decisions on immigration?)
To: madison10
I, for one will have NO problem What-so-ever spiking the football if the health debacle is struck down yeah if Roberts doesn't screw the pooch again like he did with the Az ruling
7
posted on
06/26/2012 10:35:26 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: IBD editorial writer
—Obviously, the part that was upheld stung them bigtime.—
Before the vote, to the general public, that part was all there was. Most people were not even aware of the ones that failed. And that means that, at the end of the day, to the average american, AZ won against the WH in a unanimous decision.
8
posted on
06/26/2012 10:36:08 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: IBD editorial writer
Odinga can’t quite bend the rules far enough to get what he wants so he has a hissy fit. FUBO!
To: IBD editorial writer
And even beyond what is reported in the article, the Administration has established an 800 number for people to report suspected civil rights violations just in Arizona. Obama is at war with the US and trying to finish her off before his grip on power is loosened.
10
posted on
06/26/2012 10:38:53 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: IBD editorial writer
Screw you, boy socialist...!
To: IBD editorial writer
Are the spineless gutless GOP going to do ANYTHING to stop this guy???? He’s got 6 more months of damage to do - and I hear NOTHING from Boehner/McConnell/Romney/ et al.
12
posted on
06/26/2012 10:45:58 AM PDT
by
klb99
(I now understand why the South seceeded)
To: IBD editorial writer
Which is why Congress SHOULD spike the ball when they shut down obamacare.
To: IBD editorial writer
Isn’t Obamaland great?
Now go pay your taxes. Your government is broke. :)
14
posted on
06/26/2012 10:52:41 AM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(THIS SUCKS)
To: IBD editorial writer
Fanatics rarely respond well to being called to account. You just have to defeat them in detail.
15
posted on
06/26/2012 10:55:05 AM PDT
by
ArmstedFragg
(hoaxy dopey changey)
To: Truth29
Yup. Essentially the hotline is an effort to solicit plaintiffs.
16
posted on
06/26/2012 10:59:15 AM PDT
by
ArmstedFragg
(hoaxy dopey changey)
To: IBD editorial writer
This is another proof that King Obama is a really mentally sick nitwit.
To: Truth29
CRACKA needs to call that number and complain about being profiled as a racist...oh never mind we are the privileged and have lost equal protection for it.
18
posted on
06/26/2012 11:25:00 AM PDT
by
hope
To: klb99
Would you like Congress to pass another law to stop Obama?
To: Vaquero
yeah if Roberts doesn't screw the pooch again like he did with the Az ruling You do realize that if Roberts didn't 'screw the pooch' the ruling would have reverted to the 9th circuit ruling (due to the tie) and the one win that was achieved would have been lost.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson