Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; LucyT; Brown Deer; PghBaldy; In Maryland; pabianice; txrangerette; stephenjohnbanker; ...

I have been waiting for a link to Scalia’s Bench Statement on Arizona v. United States-—and it doesn’t disappoint. It deserved its own thread.


9 posted on 06/25/2012 11:11:39 AM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thouworm

” As my opinion describes in more detail, however, most of the provisions challenged here do not even impose additional penalties or consequences for violation of federal immigration laws; they merely apply stricter enforcement. The federal government would have us believe (and the Court today agrees) that even that is forbidden. “

Scalia nails it.


13 posted on 06/25/2012 11:19:44 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: thouworm; TheOldLady; WildHighlander57; netmilsmom; tomdavidd; Freeper; Gvl_M3; Flotsam_Jetsome; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Arizona v. United States--- Scalia's Dissenting Bench Statement

Article, and # 1.

Thank you, thouworm.

25 posted on 06/25/2012 11:49:44 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BlatherNaut

See Scalia’s dissent above at article and post #1.


48 posted on 06/25/2012 12:44:54 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson