Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zimmerman Prosecutors Struggle to Outmaneuver Florida Law
US Politics Today ^ | June 23, 2012

Posted on 06/23/2012 1:22:21 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law is complicating matters for prosecutors rushing to convict George Zimmerman. The law is clear that residents can meet force with force when they feel threatened.

Florida's Stand Your Ground law allows residents to use deadly force to defend themselves or their property, and when doing so, protects them from prosecution. This law may derail the prosecution of defendant George Zimmerman in the much-publicized case of a neighborhood watch volunteer who shot and killed teenager Trayvon Martin.

State prosecutors see the case as open-and-shut, arguing that Martin was simply a kid buying a soda at a convenience store. When Zimmerman called 911 to report a suspicious individual, police told him to stand down until they arrived; he did not.

While authorities note that the one possibly threatening detail about Trayvon Martin was a simple hooded sweatshirt, George Zimmerman claims that Martin physically attacked him.

Florida's Stand Your Ground law is clear: an individual has no duty to retreat from a public confrontation in which he or she reasonably perceives a danger. As the Miami Herald notes, Floridians are allowed to "meet force with force." In fact, Zimmerman was not initially arrested by police at all for this very reason.

And, the law receives strong support. A recent Quinnipiac University poll finds support for the state law at 56 percent, with only 35 percent opposed to it.

While he was eventually charged with second degree murder, state prosecutors have no easy task to explain why Stand Your Ground should not apply to George Zimmerman. In fact, anyone facing charges of murder or homicide in Florida should discuss their situation with an experienced criminal defense attorney who will hold the prosecution accountable for proving their case at every step and ensure the defendant's rights under state law are respected.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angelacorey; banglist; florida; georgezimmerman; standyourground; trayvon; trayvonmartin; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2012 1:22:38 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This account is full of lies, especially the tired old canard, that has been disproved, that Zimmerman didn’t “stand down” when he was told. Actually he was never told to stand down but when they told him to quit following he did.


2 posted on 06/23/2012 1:30:55 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
...Martin was simply a kid buying a soda at a convenience store...

They forgot the part about the poor little kid stopping to break Zimmermans nose and bash his skull into the pavement.

3 posted on 06/23/2012 1:37:44 AM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Whether found guilty or not guilty, there will be riots.


4 posted on 06/23/2012 1:38:21 AM PDT by panaxanax (Voting 'Third Party' will ensure a Communist-Marxist-Socialist dominated Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Truly dumb article. Zimmerman’s claims of self-defense have nothing at all to do with Florida SYG law, but rather rely on rights to self-defense included in earlier Florida law, and indeed in the law in every other state.

Now his claims may be untrue or invalid, as if it can be shown that Z started the fight, but even in such a case they still have nothing to do with SYG.

SYG may be a bad law, and modifications may be appropriate. But misstating what the laws says and how it applies is no help whatsoever to the public conversation on the issue.


5 posted on 06/23/2012 1:42:51 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

This article came from a law firm in Florida.


6 posted on 06/23/2012 1:54:27 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The law is clear that residents can meet force with force when they feel threatened.”

The law doesn’t apply IMO. When someone is sitting on your chest choking the life out of you retreat isn’t very feasible.


7 posted on 06/23/2012 2:26:03 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I haven’t read the actual statute, but I don’t think that the word “feel” is in there. At least I hope it isn’t.


8 posted on 06/23/2012 2:29:06 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

They can rename the town Sanford & Son. maybe that will mollify the melanometricist mob..


9 posted on 06/23/2012 2:33:08 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
No it doesn't use the word 'feel'. See text below. The law came into being because there were cases where people were convicted for defending themselves because they didn't run away. Oversealous or anti-gun prosecutors would prosecute people who failed to retreat regardless of the threat they faced.

JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE

776.012 Use of force in defense of person.—

A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or

(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.

10 posted on 06/23/2012 2:38:18 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
There will not be riots in Sanford, Florida.

He will never be convicted. Leaks by the Newspapers doesn't change the facts a thug up to no good and was attacking George Zimmmerman got what he deserved

11 posted on 06/23/2012 2:59:32 AM PDT by scooby321 (h tones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
There will not be riots in Sanford, Florida.

He will never be convicted. Leaks by the Newspapers doesn't change the facts a thug up to no good and was attacking George Zimmmerman got what he deserved

12 posted on 06/23/2012 3:00:26 AM PDT by scooby321 (h tones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Martin was simply a kid buying a soda

I know it is not PC, but the media continue to lie about the "soda" or "ice tea" that the 6'2" Trayvon Martin had purchased.

It was an Arizona Watermelon drink. Crime scene photo below:

I bring this up NOT because of stereotypes or because it is significant to the facts of this case. No, I bring it up because this fact, like almost all of the facts of this case, have been distorted, suppressed, and manipulated by the Media, the Democrats, the Community Organizer, the Race Hustlers, and the Prosecutors.


13 posted on 06/23/2012 3:14:11 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Martin was simply a kid buying a soda

I know it is not PC, but the media continue to lie about the "soda" or "ice tea" that the 6'2" Trayvon Martin had purchased.

It was an Arizona Watermelon drink. Crime scene photo below:

I bring this up NOT because of stereotypes or because it is significant to the facts of this case. No, I bring it up because this fact, like almost all of the facts of this case, have been distorted, suppressed, and manipulated by the Media, the Democrats, the Community Organizer, the Race Hustlers, and the Prosecutors.


14 posted on 06/23/2012 3:14:27 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

15 posted on 06/23/2012 3:16:18 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

AriZona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail to be exact.


16 posted on 06/23/2012 3:34:33 AM PDT by wolficatZ ("We are no longer accepting comments on this article")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ
Update #26 Part 2 – Trayvon Martin Shooting – A year of drug use culminates in predictable violence…
17 posted on 06/23/2012 3:40:16 AM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.


18 posted on 06/23/2012 3:52:24 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Zimmerman was not ordered to “stand down” or to stop following Treyvon.

When Zimmerman was asked what he was doing, he replied that he was following Treyvon.

The exact words of the 911 dispatch was “we don’t need you to do that”

That sounds like a suggestion rather than an order.


19 posted on 06/23/2012 4:02:26 AM PDT by kennyboy509 ( Ha! I kill me!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Just remember.....MANY residents heard the cries for help and NOT ONE went out to help.

Of course I don't blame them....because our sweet little Tray may have had a GUN.

And that's why they didn't go out....because of Obama's son TRAY....not Zimmerman.

20 posted on 06/23/2012 4:07:09 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson