Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Power Grabs Create an Imperial Presidency
Townhall.com ^ | June 19, 2012 | Ken Blackwell

Posted on 06/19/2012 5:06:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

Editor's Note: This column was coauthored by Ken Klukowski.

In 2010 we published a book arguing that Barack Obama was creating an imperial presidency. The past few months prove that prediction was correct.

First President Obama’s EPA claimed power to create cap-and-trade through new regulations, rather than Congress passing a law. Then Obama’s FCC claimed the power to regulate the Internet, despite a federal appeals court ruling that only Congress could authorize such control through legislation. More recently, Obama’s Department of HHS issued regulations requiring Catholic and Evangelical organizations to violate their religious conscience regarding birth control and abortion-related services.

Then we got a double-whammy in just one week. First Obama flaunts the fact that he refuses to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court, despite the fact that every administration is duty-bound to defend federal statutes, and there would be wailing and gnashing of teeth if a conservative Republican president failed to defend a liberal law in court. Afterward, Obama announces that, having failed to get the DREAM Act through Congress, he will simply accomplish its provisions by ordering the government to stop enforcing the law by not deporting certain illegal aliens, and then break the law by taking the affirmative step of actually issuing those people work visas.

These issues do not concern the environment, the Internet, religion, marriage, and immigration, respectively. Instead it’s about the rule of law and limited government under our Constitution.

The Constitution vests all lawmaking power in Congress. It vests all executive power to enforce and administer those laws in the president. And it vests all judicial power—including the power to determine whether lesser laws violate the Supreme Law (the Constitution)—in the courts.

In the aforementioned actions, President Obama has arrogated to himself all of those powers. If Congress doesn’t make the laws he wants, he just declares them under the name of “regulations.” If he doesn’t like a law on the books, he acts like the judiciary by proclaiming the law unconstitutional, and refuses to enforce it. He effectively makes or abolishes laws at will.

The Far Left tried to dismiss our book by saying that an “imperial presidency” sounded conspiratorial, or perhaps we were challenging the president’s character or patriotism. We remained respectful and focused on facts and policy, not personality and politics. Yet we took seriously Obama’s pledge to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.” Since the Constitution denies him such sweeping power, we concluded the only way he could do the various things he was promising would be by subverting the Constitution. And he has.

An imperial president is one who claims and asserts powers that the Constitution does not confer upon him. Although we take it for granted today, the most revolutionary aspect of our Constitution is that it’s a written document. It was the first written Constitution in the history of the world. And the reason it’s written down is so that it would be crystal clear to all what the powers of each branch of government are.

A written Constitution is only one of five promises the Constitution makes to the American people to preserve their liberty. The Constitution also splits governmental power between the federal government and the states. It splits the federal power into the three branches (legislative, executive, and judicial). It sets each branch against the other two through checks and balances. And it retains ultimate sovereignty in We the People, by giving us regular elections and empowering us to amend the Constitution when necessary.

This president has engaged in a series of unprecedented power grabs during his term of office. The past week’s amnesty plan is just the latest in a long train of imperial abuses. And he’s done all this knowing he still has to stand for reelection.

Can you even imagine how far he will go if he wins reelection and knows he will never again be held to account?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/19/2012 5:06:38 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And what do the RINOS do to stop him?

NOTHING —NOT A DAMN THING?

AND-they ask me for money. Fat chance.


2 posted on 06/19/2012 5:09:54 AM PDT by Flintlock (THE TRUTH: It's the new hate speech..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Imagine if a Republican president said he was going to just shut down abortion "clinics", and pull all funding through an Executive Order.

Just imagine. Cuz gosh, isn't killing your kid a Constiutional Right, guaranteed by God to Wo-Man?

3 posted on 06/19/2012 5:13:24 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yep, Obama’s a dictator. People don’t seem to know enough to realize it.


4 posted on 06/19/2012 5:41:20 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Socialism isn't going to work this time, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

The red state governors should go on TV and tell the nation that they are not going to enforce any of Obama’s imperial fiats. Then invite Bozo to sue them to require enforcement.


5 posted on 06/19/2012 5:44:47 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

Just wondering here. How can Republicans control what Obama does?


6 posted on 06/19/2012 5:48:32 AM PDT by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
How can Republicans control what Obama does?

On the matter of his amnesty dictate Congress can impeach. They won't. And don't ask them to or Boner will cry.

7 posted on 06/19/2012 5:53:40 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Proud to be an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

If the Republicans in the Congress don’t have a problem with it, and they obviously don’t.

Why should we ? /s/

Boehner and McConnell are part of this new design for the leadership of our country. They are certainly doing nothing to stop it.


8 posted on 06/19/2012 5:56:59 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

This cuntry was set up to stop just this threat.

That’s what Congress and the Supreme court are for.

The problem is that the Founders never thought that both of the checks and balances built in would ever be filled with professional traitors. People who would willingly allow a Dictator to take control as long as they get their piece of the action.

Our country was set up assuming that there would always be patriots in the Congress and the Supreme Court.


9 posted on 06/19/2012 6:04:48 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

It would be worth a try anyway. Make the uninformed public aware of the real issue; not immigration but Constitutional separation of powers. Of course Dems would have a field day crying about election eve politics when everyone knows Reid’s Senate would never convict. Still it would be newsworthy if the House at least held committee hearings on impeachment of Obama and Holder both.


10 posted on 06/19/2012 6:07:24 AM PDT by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock
There is a power vacuum in the US Congress... there is NO political will to enforce existing and established laws, there is no collective will to challenge the incessant and criminal 'irregularities'.

When that happens, there will ALWAYS be an ‘Obama’ to step in and take the most extreme advantage of the situation and do what ever is permitted in order to achieve his/her own ends.

Does anyone REALLY blame Robespierre for the terror? DON'T BLAME OBAMA!!

11 posted on 06/19/2012 6:31:45 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson