Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Kills X-Ray Space Telescope Mission
discovery.com ^ | 06-07-2012 | Content provided by Clara Moskowitz, SPACE.com

Posted on 06/08/2012 7:21:33 AM PDT by Red Badger

The Gravity and Extreme Magnetism Small Explorer (GEMS) was running over-budget, so the space agency scrapped it.

ASA is canceling all work on a new space telescope designed to seek out black holes and other cosmic mysteries through X-ray light due to soaring development costs, the space agency announced today (June 7).

The mission, called Gravity and Extreme Magnetism Small Explorer (GEMS), was running significantly over budget, said Paul Hertz, director of NASA's Astrophysics Division, during a phone call to reporters today.

"The GEMS project was initiated under a very well-defined cost cap," Hertz said. "As they approached their confirmation review, it was clear they would not be able to complete it within their cost cap. NASA made the very difficult decision not to confirm GEMS into the implementation phase."

ANALYSIS: Fattest Black Holes Feasted On Two Buffets

The mission team had almost completed the design stage of the project and was nearing the point where hardware for the mission would begin to be built. No working instruments were yet constructed, Hertz said.

The project was selected as a "small explorer" class mission, with a firm cost limit of $105 million, not including the price of launching the spacecraft. NASA recently commissioned an independent review of GEMS' budget, and found that the ultimate price tag for the spacecraft was likely to be 20 to 30 percent over budget.

Because of the cost overrun, NASA decided to pull the plug on GEMS last month. On June 5, the GEMS team, led by principal investigator Jean Swank of the agency's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., appealed the decision and submitted documents to show they had identified new areas of cost savings.

However, NASA was not swayed.

The space agency will now have to pay an estimated $13 million in close-out costs to cancel the mission, including contract cancelation fees to Orbital Sciences Corp. and other companies that were hired to built the spacecraft.

GEMS was to use three telescopes to capture the bent X-ray light from extremely dense objects such as black holes, neutron stars and stellar remnants. The mission would have launched no earlier than 2014 and lasted two years.

"Although there aren't any other projects in the queue right now to measure polarized X-ray sources, there are a number of observatories which can address the science questions from different areas," including NASA's NuSTAR space mission, due to launch June 13, Hertz said.

ANALYSIS: Black Holes are Bad for Star Formation

The main factor behind the cost overrun was the trickiness of developing the technology needed for the mission, he said.

"The instrument technology was more difficult and took longer than they had originally estimated," Hertz said. "That delayed their ability to get started on the rest of their schedule."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: California; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: budget; nasa; space; telescope

Artist's illustration of NASA's GEMS X-ray observatory intended to study black holes and neutron stars.

1 posted on 06/08/2012 7:21:42 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Hopefully this frees up money for their “Promote Muslim Self Esteem” program.


2 posted on 06/08/2012 7:25:58 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I wonder how many dollars that artist’s depiction costs?


3 posted on 06/08/2012 7:27:57 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Defeat Obama. Everything else is secondary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

LOL that’s one seriously pathetic photoshop job. The craft casts a shadow on open space.


4 posted on 06/08/2012 7:31:33 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The description of that project strikes me as a giant black hole itself....into which we would have continued to pour money! Couldn’t pull the plug FAST ENOUGH to suit me!


5 posted on 06/08/2012 7:42:28 AM PDT by Tucker39 ( Psa 68:19Blessed be the Lord, who daily loadeth us with benefits; even the God of our salvation.KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
James Webb Space Telescope is figuratively a black hole as it sucked all the money that could of been used for projects like this. The cost of the telescope went from $500 MM to now almost $9 billion. Also sucks they named the next Hubble after a bureaucrat, granted an important one.
6 posted on 06/08/2012 8:08:09 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

The cost was only around $120 MM although who knows what it would be if it continued. Unfortunately NASA has blown billions on “high profile” projects where perhaps the money could of been better used on lots of these smaller projects, i.e. more bang for the buck.


7 posted on 06/08/2012 8:10:58 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

TINFOIL ALERT!

What do they NOT want us to see out there in the X-ray spectrum!!!


8 posted on 06/08/2012 8:16:18 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

That was my first thought. Money that should be going to Muslim outreach is wasted on science. NASA is forgetting its purpose.


9 posted on 06/08/2012 8:17:12 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

NASA became just another bloated beauracracy with its people afraid to do anything.
Now it is just like the education dept or Justice or State dept. oh yeah and like the bureau of indian affairs.
Close em all down and tell the folks to get real jobs.


10 posted on 06/08/2012 8:17:54 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
ANALYSIS: Half-Black A-Holes are Bad for Capital Formation
11 posted on 06/08/2012 9:19:58 AM PDT by mikrofon (TFI Bump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Fattest Black Holes Feasted On Two Buffets”

I wish we could quit talking about Michelle.

I hate winter, but November can’t get here soon enough. Perhaps then, America can begin to dream again.


12 posted on 06/08/2012 9:40:27 AM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I love high tech and exploring new frontiers, but to pizz away tons of money we don’t even HAVE, pretending we’re “monitoring” something that is taking place hundreds of LIGHT YEARS AWAY, is stupidity gone-to-seed, in MY book!


13 posted on 06/08/2012 7:28:24 PM PDT by Tucker39 ( Psa 68:19Blessed be the Lord, who daily loadeth us with benefits; even the God of our salvation.KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson