Posted on 06/07/2012 2:50:13 AM PDT by Yosemitest
RUSH: This is the great unknown.
I really would love to tell you that, yeah, they're gonna get the message.
I don't know how they couldn't get the message,
but this is the big question:
END TRANSCRIPT
Related Links
Mitt. Its time you quit!
Your credibility isnt worth spit.
RINOs, the Establishment, and Democrats all agree,
But in the General Election, to Obama theyll flee.
Against Obama, liberals and moderates know youll lose.
But conservatives, Romney theyll never choose.
Mitt, our loyalty you cant buy.
Back to Massachusetts, youd better fly.
Just like Gerald Ford, Bob Dole, and John McCain,
Nominee Willard Mitt Romney will result in the same.
As a Governor, your record isnt that great.
Out of 50 states, your popularity was number 48.
Your experience, the Establishment types tout.
Defending federal bailouts and FDIC loan forgiveness will find you out.
Democrats and RINOs cower from their liberal wives,
Supporting Romney with nothing but lies.
In 1994 Ted Kennedy showed Willard to be a great bane,
With Mitts Bain, and Bain Capital, Obama will do the same.
Damon Corp, with Romney paid $119 million in a fine.
Yet Willard says, for his leadership, its time.
He claims jobs he can create and taxes he can lower,
47th out of 50 in growth he rates. Can it get any slower?
$740.5 million dollars a year, fees and taxes under Mitt increased.
Will the half-truths and lies from Romney ever cease?
For Liberty and Freedom, we dont need Flakes,
But Romney says Healthcare responsibilities belong to the States.
Conservatives stand for Self-responsibility, Self-accountability, and Self-reliance.
But against these things, Willards actions scream in defiance.
Establishment Republicans thinks Romney can help take back the Senate,
But they know that for President, Mitt can NOT win it.
Like everything the Establishment Republicans try to do,
It leads to failure, and we get the bill, as well as the screw.
In their corruption, little change do they seek,
They dont want our Freedom to peak.
Their craving for power has pushed their bravery,
To ignore our Constitution, and sell us into economical slavery.
So Willard, dont lecture us on the need for patience and compromise.
Romney, be selfless. Conservatism is on the rise.
Choosing the lesser of two evils, isnt what we desire.
You let them rewrite the language. Wheres your fire?
Romney, they accuse us falsely, and you do little.
Wheres your response, or can you only twiddle?
Mitt, you dont have what it takes to lead.
So with you I plead.
Do you really want to go from Obama-care to Romney-care?
With you, this nation will pull out its hair!
Go somewhere and quietly think
and sit.
Know your own limitations! Mitt. Its time you quit!
Rush NAILS IT!
The establishment won’t ge it because it conflicts with their goal of a huge government cow that can be milked.
Replace the Republican National Committeemen if you want to send a real message. Its probably one of the easiest things you could do.
ya need a dose of ANNIE COULTER, lad......
read this please.... http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-02-22.html
This is how she closes....
“We’re being asked to hand Obama another four years in the White House in order to “send a message.” To whom? And what message? That we’re morons? Message received!
Meanwhile, Romney cheerfully campaigns on, the biggest outsider and most conservative candidate we’ve run for president since Reagan, while being denounced by the Establishment as “too Establishment.”
(TIME TO CUT THE NONSENSE...if Mitt does not win and Obama gets to put in 2 liberal supreme court justices....WE ARE SUNK...)
The election was held on November 4, 1980. Ronald Reagan with running mate George H.W. Bush beat Carter by almost 10 percentage points in the popular vote. Republicans also gained control of the Senate for the first time in twenty-five years on Reagan's coattails. The electoral college vote was a landslide, with 489 votes (representing 44 states) for Reagan and 49 votes for Carter (representing 6 states and the District of Columbia). NBC News projected Reagan as the winner at 8:15 pm EST (5:15 PST), before voting was finished in the West, based on exit polls. (It was the first time a broadcast network used exit polling to project a winner, and took the other broadcast networks by surprise.) Carter conceded defeat at 9:50 pm EST.[25][26] Carter's loss was the worst defeat for an incumbent President since Herbert Hoover lost to Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 by a margin of 18%. Carter's defeat is the most lopsided defeat for any incumbent president in an election where only two candidates won electoral votes. Also, Jimmy Carter is the first incumbent Democrat to serve only one full term since James Buchanan and fail to secure re-election since Andrew Johnson (Grover Cleveland served two non-consecutive terms while Harry Truman and Lyndon B. Johnson served one full term in addition to taking over after the deaths of Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy respectively).
John Anderson won 6.6% of the popular vote and failed to win any state outright. He found the most support in New England, fueled by liberal Republicans who felt Reagan was too far to the right; his best showing was in Massachusetts, where he won 15% of the popular vote. Conversely, Anderson performed worst in the South. Anderson failed to achieve the spoiler effect, due to Reagan's strong showing and the fact that he arguably attracted at least as many Democrats to his ticket as Republicans.
Libertarian Party candidate Ed Clark received 921,299 popular votes (1.1%). The Libertarians succeeded in getting Clark on the ballot in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Clark's best showing was in Alaska, where he received 12% of the vote. As of 2008, this is the best performance by a Libertarian presidential candidate.
Reagan won 53% of the vote in reliably Democratic South Boston.[13]
Reagan's electoral college victory of 489 electoral votes (90.9% of the electoral vote) is the most lopsided electoral college victory for a non-incumbent President.
This was also the last election in which an incumbent president was defeated in two elections in a row. The only other time this happened was in 1892.
Ronald Reagan was re-elected following the November 6 election in an electoral and popular vote landslide, winning 49 states. Reagan won a record 525 electoral votes total (of 538 possible), and received 58.8 percent of the popular vote; despite Ferraro's selection, 55% of women who voted did so for Reagan,[24] and his 54 to 61% of the Catholic vote was the highest for a Republican candidate in history.[28]:191 Mondale's 13 electoral college votes (from his home state of Minnesotawhich he won by 0.18%and the District of Columbia) marked the lowest total of any major Presidential candidate since Alf Landon's 1936 loss to Franklin D. Roosevelt. Mondale's defeat was also the worst for any Democratic Party candidate in U.S. history in the Electoral College (and his 13 electoral votes the fewest any Democrat has won since Stephen A. Douglas claimed 12 in the 1860 election, when the Democratic vote was divided), though others, including Alton B. Parker, James M. Cox, John W. Davis, and George S. McGovern, did worse in the popular vote.
Psephologists pointed to "Reagan Democrats"millions of Democrats who voted for Reagan, as in 1980. They characterized such Reagan Democrats as southern whites and northern blue collar workers who voted for Reagan because they credited him with the economic recovery, saw Reagan as strong on national security issues, and perceived the Democrats as supporting the poor and minorities at the expense of the middle class. The Democratic National Committee commissioned a study after the election that came to these conclusions, but suppressed the "explosive report" afraid that it would offend its key voters.[28]:186,191-193
This was the last election in which the Republican candidate carried every Northeastern state. Though even here, Reagan failed to carry Washington, D.C. This was representative of the future dominance of the Democratic Party in that region.
” if Mitt does not win and Obama gets to put in 2 liberal supreme court justices....”
What makes you think Mitt would appoint conservative, pro life judges?
Any of the other candidates WOULD have done that but Mitt is the “etch-a-sketch”.
I hope that, if he is the choice he wins over Obama.
But from a personal moral conviction I can’t vote for him.
(Just about ANY of the others would have been acceptable.)
The Republican Party, as it stands now must die!
LOL!! Spot On Sarge!
Thank-you for your response!
If it is possible, can you please find a map of 2012 America with the red and blue areas please. THANKS ahead. :)
Romney is going to be the nominee no matter what contention is brought but what should happen at the convention is conservatives have a responsibility to hold the GOPe and Romney's feet to the fire. Bring down the GOPe house! Send a CLEAR message, you will follow our conservative lead without exception. If this is accomplished to a satisfactory degree, in this extreme case because we are truly up against not only an incompetent evil marxist, but most likely an ineligible unqualified anti-capitalist/anit-American. I would say this election calls for extreme measures. I feel confident in not wasting my vote.
If conservatives (I include myself) will not do what is necessary to gain control of the party this election then they can KMA and so called conservative wimps can piss off, I'm saying good riddance!
Conservatives have to regain power in the republican party or guys like you and I are going to bolt and the republican party will be left with only total losers!
Of course, you are right. I don’t trust Romney either. We must put all are trust in the only alternative, Obama.
Either way we are sunk.
Romney favors gun bans, individual mandates, homosexual marriage, etc etc etc.
Tell me how that is any different from Obama?
The milking of our government by the GOP establishment also involves going against the interests of the people in small business by protecting and establishing corporate monopolies; and in tax feeding the police and defense industry, turning America into the latest war zone by naming Americans the terrorist enemy they are after and stripping American “insergents” of their constitutional rights and dignity.
The Establishment is abosultely poison to the US right now.
The Establishment is abosultely poison to the US right now.
Yeah, the danger posed by the Islamofascists pales in comparison.
Updated 6/7/12, 3:00 PM ET
Latest 2012 Presidential Election Polls & Electoral Vote Projection - Here is the 2012 Presidential Election Electoral Vote Map (above) and Table (below). We have shaded the states according to our current estimate of how the state is likely to vote in the November 2012 General Election. States that we consider “tossup” states we have shaded in green.
Check back often as we keep this map updated frequently with our projection based on current polls, trends, and the all important “gut-feeling.” To see the most recent polls for each state, just click on the state name in the table below. The most recent polls are also linked at the top of the table. We’ll do our best to keep it that way from day to day. Polls will be posted as they come out – when we can do so. But look for everything to be updated late each evening.
2012 Presidential Election Electoral College Vote State-by-State Projection |
||||
Current Projection: Obama 237 Romney 181 Tossup 120 (270 Needed to Win)
Latest State Polls Added (Click on State name below to see polls & polling averages): MI, PA, VA, VA, CT, FL, MA, MA, CA, CA, WI, OH, IA, CO, NV, NY, MO, MI, CA, CO, MD, CA, GA, WI, NC, WI, MA, VA, FL, OH, PA, FL, VT, PA, NC, OK, TX, TN, NE, WI, NC, NC, NJ, NH, WI, MN, NY, ME, GA, MI, WA, WI, OR, OH, OH, MA, FL, IA, MT, VA, OH, FL, AZ, PA, WI |
||||
State |
Electoral Votes |
2008 Results |
Latest 2012 Poll Average |
Current Projection |
Alabama |
9 |
McCain +21% |
|
Romney |
Alaska |
3 |
McCain +21% |
Romney |
|
11 |
McCain +8% |
Romney +3.6 44.3% – 40.7% |
Romney |
|
6 |
McCain +20% |
Romney +24.0 57.0% – 33.0% |
Romney |
|
55 |
Obama +24% |
Obama +16.8 52.8% – 36.0% |
Obama |
|
9 |
Obama +9% |
Obama +1.7 47.0% – 45.3% |
Tossup |
|
7 |
Obama +22% |
Obama +12.0 50.0% – 38.0% |
Obama |
|
Delaware |
3 |
Obama +25% |
|
Obama |
D.C. |
3 |
Obama +86% |
|
Obama |
29 |
Obama +3% |
Obama +0.4 46.0% – 45.6% |
Tossup |
|
16 |
McCain +5% |
Romney +11.5 51.5% – 40.0% |
Romney |
|
4 |
Obama + 45% |
Obama +27.0 59.0% – 32.0% |
Obama |
|
Idaho |
4 |
McCain +25% |
|
Romney |
20 |
Obama +25% |
Obama +21.0 56.0% – 35.0% |
Obama |
|
11 |
Obama +1% |
Romney +9.0 49.0% – 40.0% |
Romney |
|
6 |
Obama +10% |
Obama +2.6 46.3% – 43.7% |
Tossup |
|
6 |
McCain +15% |
Romney +17.0 52.0% – 35.0% |
Romney |
|
8 |
McCain +16% |
Romney +8.0 48.0% – 40.0% |
Romney |
|
Louisiana |
8 |
McCain +19% |
|
Romney |
4 |
Obama +17% |
Obama +13.0 52.5% – 39.5% |
Obama |
|
10 |
Obama +25% |
Obama +23.0 58.0% – 35.0% |
Obama |
|
11 |
Obama +26% |
Obama +20.0 54.3% – 34.3% |
Obama |
|
16 |
Obama +16% |
Obama +6.0 47.7% – 41.7% |
Obama |
|
10 |
Obama +10% |
Obama +12.0 51.5% – 39.5% |
Obama |
|
6 |
McCain +13% |
Romney +18.0 54.0% – 36.0% |
Romney |
|
10 |
McCain +0.13% |
Romney +1.0 46.0% – 45.0% |
Tossup |
|
3 |
McCain +2% |
Romney +6.0 49.5% – 43.5% |
Romney |
|
5 |
McCain +15% |
Romney +13.0 52.0% – 39.0% |
Romney |
|
6 |
Obama +12% |
Obama +5.0 50.0% – 45.0% |
Tossup |
|
4 |
Obama +10% |
Obama +6.4 48.7% – 42.3% |
Tossup |
|
14 |
Obama +16% |
Obama +11.5 49.5% – 38.0% |
Obama |
|
5 |
Obama +15% |
Obama +15.0 53.0% – 38.0% |
Obama |
|
29 |
Obama +27% |
Obama +22.4 56.7% – 34.3% |
Obama |
|
15 |
Obama +0.33% |
Romney +2.5 47.5% – 45.0% |
Tossup |
|
3 |
McCain +9% |
Romney +14.0 47.0% – 33.0% |
Romney |
|
18 |
Obama +5% |
Obama +3.0 46.8% – 43.8% |
Tossup |
|
7 |
McCain +31% |
Romney +35.0 62.0% – 27.0% |
Romney |
|
7 |
Obama +16% |
Obama +4.0 47.0% – 43.0% |
Obama |
|
20 |
Obama +10% |
Obama +8.5 48.0% – 39.5% |
Obama |
|
4 |
Obama +28% |
Obama +17.0 54.0% – 37.0% |
Obama |
|
9 |
McCain +9% |
Romney +4.7 46.7% – 42.0% |
Romney |
|
South Dakota |
3 |
McCain +8% |
|
Romney |
11 |
McCain +15% |
Romney +6.5 47.0% – 40.5% |
Romney |
|
38 |
McCain +12% |
Romney +13.5 52.5% – 39.0% |
Romney |
|
6 |
McCain +28% |
Romney +32.0 63.0% – 31.0% |
Romney |
|
3 |
Obama +37% |
Obama +31.0 59.0% – 28.0% |
Obama |
|
13 |
Obama +6% |
Obama +4.8 48.8% – 44.0% |
Tossup |
|
12 |
Obama +17% |
Obama +13.4 50.7% – 37.3% |
Obama |
|
5 |
McCain +13% |
Romney +17.0 54.0% – 37.0% |
Romney |
|
10 |
Obama +14% |
Obama +5.8 48.4% – 42.6% |
Tossup |
|
Wyoming |
3 |
McCain +32% |
|
Romney |
State |
Electoral Votes
538 |
2008 Results
Barack Obama 365 / 53% John McCain 173 / 46% |
Latest 2012 Poll Average |
Projection
Romney = 181 Obama = 237 Tossup = 120 |
THANK-YOU for your help!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.