Bush administration waterboarding someone they KNOW is a terrorist = BAD!Obama personally deciding to kill someone he THINKS has been identified as a terrorist = GOOD!
" />
Posted on 06/06/2012 8:34:46 AM PDT by Nachum
A relatively unnoticed article by Associated Press reporter Kimberly Dozier two weeks ago outlined new Obama administration policy changes which consolidated power for authorizing drone attacks and assassinations under political appointees within the White House.
The article identifies White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan as the official assuming the role of Obama’s de facto assassination czar, raising concerns even within the Obama administration that the White House is increasingly turning into “a pseudo-military headquarters” under the direction of just a few senior Obama administration officials.
Adding to these concerns are serious questions about Brennan’s qualifications for this role. Advertisement
Even before the 2008 election, eyebrows were raised over Brennan’s role in the Obama campaign. An employee of The Analysis Corporation, of which Brennan was CEO, had improperly accessed passport information for Hillary Clinton, Obama’s Democratic primary challenger at the time, and GOP nominee John McCain. At the time, Brennan was a top adviser to the Obama campaign, and Brennan’s employee was not fired. (One of the key witnesses in the case was found murdered in his car outside his church while the investigation was still ongoing.)
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
He was on TV a few weeks self-righteously claiming to be non-partisan in his current job...and bristling at any criticisms as purely partisan-driven.
Well, if Brennan doesn’t have domestic terrorist George Soros at the top of his list, he’s not qualified for the job, IMHO.
Martial Law before November.
http://www.google.com/#q=martial+law+before+november&hl=en&prmd=imvns&ei=UILPT_nkDMPH6gGX9di4DA&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=b7cda760e661d08f&biw=1280&bih=669&safe=images
Can someone tell me why the sound of crickets from the Left on this killing policy? Talk about a possible innocent person being killed by a drone from on high, liberals can’t bear the thought of one innocent person getting the death penalty in a court of law, but say nothing about this policy??
Liberals are not worried about that one “innocent” person getting killed via the death penalty...they only pretend to be. It makes them feel good about themselves, even though they know it is a lie, they feel good.
Liberals want to kill as many people as possible. That is their goal, to kill most of the earth’s population through various death culture policies, like abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, health care rationing, forced sterilization, spiked vaccines, poisoned foods, eugenics, etc.
Bush administration waterboarding someone they KNOW is a terrorist = BAD!Obama personally deciding to kill someone he THINKS has been identified as a terrorist = GOOD!
" />
Sure.
After that wonderful job he did scrubbing Zer0's passport records as president and CEO of Analysis Inc, what could possibly go wrong?
Ulsterman had this yesterday or the day before from his WHI. (white house insider). Very interesting. I follow him on Facebook now and it’s been getting more & more interesting. Now this turns up. Way to close for comfort. They said Obama gets off on this drone thing. Literally gets off on it...
Yeah - I bought more ammo ...................... FRegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
