Do you really think that Capt. K has learned something and changed his tune?
.
.
.
Me neither.
The statement “Geo Will Schools Krugman” presupposes that Krugman can be schooled, can learn. I have serious doubts about that.
Krugman has crazy schizo eyes. He weirds me out.
Krugman is a total and complete putz!
That Karl Marx beard really fits him.
Pray for America
Wrong Krugman - IT IS fiscal responsibility versus irresponsibility - and as usual YOU Krugman are on the side of the irresponsible...
In a free society,lower taxes result in more saving and is the first step in the process of increasing capital accumulation. When the rich get richer and the capitalists accumulate capital, the natural result is greater economic progress and a higher average standard of living for wage earners.In those conditions,there is no such thing as redistributing income upwards.That is just another libtard lie.
There was once a time when one might have paid this man some kind of attention, but during the bush admin, he became a hyper partisan. So much so that his “analysis” is hopelessly skewed. He can’t even realize it, because his power of rationalization is too great.that happens to a lot of otherwise intelligent liberals.
But Walker did what Alan Mulally did at Ford which should be a model for all Statezilla's and Fedzilla's.... They are..
* Cut expenses by looking at all internal processes and reinvent them and or reinvent how you make your product.
* 2nd Increase Revenue ( and Profits ) with better product.
Walker did the same thing for a Gov't Entity.
* He cut expenses and re-engineered Union Contracts, for example how Teachers buy health care etc. to cut cost.
* He increased Revenue if you will by making Wisconsin more friendly for business.
It is similar but different, but it worked, just like Ford.....
Krugman can't rap his mind around it because my guess he probably hasn't run a lemonade stand just like Obama and like Obama they are theoreticians.
This fall and in a few days with the ballot box we tell them what we think of theoreticians.
It will suck to be them...
BTW this is a must read !!!!
Mark
How can a guy like Krugman have a career? He was an “economic adviser” to one of the biggest corporate economic failures to date (Enron), a failure that resulted in the CFO (that’s Chief FINANCIAL Officer, a man that Krugman no doubt spent a lot of time “advising”) going to prison. Think about it—you hire on as a consultant and the result of your labor is that your client goes to prison. How does one maintain any credibility after that? Does he have pictures of important people in compromising positions??
Krugman defends the Solyndra loss as “only” $1 billion because it’s small potatoes compared to the $15 trillion federal debt.
Yes, he said this.
Mind-of-the-Rat logic: If gov spends even MORE of our tax dollars, a $200 billion loss won’t seem a big deal.
He never stops to ask,
“Hmm. Should government be in the business of investing other people’s money and taking risks with those scarce funds at no cost to the bureaucrat or the subsidized campaign contributor, er - “alternative-energy entrepreneur”?
Or, should government simply encourage more private investment with favorable tax policies, let individual investors make the more careful choices, and bear both the risks and rewards?”
bump