Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

Salve

Yes my friend, I do also hope they will continue and be successful company.

I have question friend, if company like produced in less costs of what they have achieved, what was a purpose of Space Shuttle? Wasn’t like waste of money?

Just thinking

Merci


22 posted on 05/31/2012 8:26:04 PM PDT by MCSP2008 (Romanian native > ESL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: MCSP2008

the space shuttle was meant to make us think it was reusable, making the public think it was saving money.

It was basically rebuilt between launches.

Someday the private sector will show them how its done!


23 posted on 05/31/2012 8:29:41 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: MCSP2008

My 0.02, the Space Shuttle was a system that was crippled from the start, because they couldn’t afford to make the booster truly reusable (one design had it manned also, a lot like the Rutan system); they couldn’t make the orbiter reusable without major refurbishment either, due to technological and budgetary constraints. The turn-around time was not even close to what had been originally planned, and the per-flight cost was also much higher than originally planned. I don’t think it was considered to be “the answer” when it was completed; it wound up to be an interim design that kept flying because it was all that we had.


27 posted on 05/31/2012 8:42:17 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson