Skip to comments.Based on the Reform Agenda of German Free Market Advocates, Europe Is Doomed
Posted on 05/27/2012 6:24:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
Guido Westerwelle is supposed to be the German version of a libertarian. Currently serving as Foreign Minister, he was the chairman of the supposedly pro-market Free Democratic Party for 10 years and Wikipedia says he was known as a proponent of an unlimited free market economy.
Sounds like a good guy, right? Just the type of person who can explain that Europes problem is too much government. The kind of policy maker who can argue for cutting back the welfare state, slashing tax rates, and ending bailouts.
Thats the optimistic spin, but now lets look at the column Westerwelle wrote for the Washington Post yesterday. Entitled A Growth Pact for Europe, he called for six reforms. Unfortunately, four of the reforms mean more government and two were meaningless boilerplate. Lets look at what he proposed.
First, the European Unions budget should be consistently oriented toward growth The E.U. must utilize its resources better than before without spending more. Money is available for future-oriented tasks; in recent months, E.U. officials have been negotiating a 1?trillion-euro budget for 2014 to 2020. We should concentrate on using this huge sum consistently to promote growth and employment, innovation and competitiveness.
Im glad he says they shouldnt spend even more than is currently in the EU budget, but he apparently believes that government can redistribute 1 trillion euro in a way that boosts the economy. Good luck with that.
Second, unused E.U. funds must be activated. Around 80 billion euros in the regional cohesion fund have not been allocated to any concrete projects. The European Commission and member states must invest these funds quickly and effectively in new growth through better competitiveness.
Wow, he wants us to believe that wasting money faster is a recipe for growth. This is the same nonsense the Obama Administration was peddling.
Third, access to capital must be improved. companies are not in a position to make sensible investments that would stimulate growth. The European Investment Bank is an instrument we could use to a greater extent and in a more targeted fashion, not least to ensure that small and medium-size businesses have better access to loans.
I guess this is the European version of the bastard child of Fannie Mae and the Export-Import Bank. But if anybody thinks government-subsidized cronyism is a route to prosperity, theyve been asleep for the past 40 years.
Fourth, infrastructure projects must be promoted. Our roads, railways, and energy and telecommunication networks are among the European economys trump cards. State-of-the-art infrastructure opens new prospects for growth by making private-sector investment more attractive. We need to mobilize private capital for the cross-border expansion of European infrastructure and look at innovative forms of public-private partnership.
Ill be the first to admit that infrastructure spending is less damaging that social welfare spending, but it is a bit of a fantasy to assume that there are lots of high-return projects languishing on the shelves.
Fifth, we must complete Europes internal market. In the 1980s and 90s, realizing the four freedoms the free flow of goods, capital, services and people within the E.U. released tremendous forces for growth. Today, the expansion of the internal market to cover new spheres again offers great opportunities. That applies to the digitized economy, e-commerce and the energy sector, and it will strengthen small and medium-size companies by reducing red tape and ensuring better access to venture capital.
This boilerplate support for more free trade is fine, but I think all the big benefits of ending protectionism inside Europe already have been captured (and this is the one area where the European project has been a success).
Sixth, we want to strengthen free trade. Three-quarters of the worlds trade occurs outside the European Union. More than 80 percent of global growth is produced outside Europe. The E.U. must work toward making the Doha Round a success while also concluding more free-trade agreements with new and long-established centers of power.
Again, this a good sentiment, but I fear it is a throwaway passage. Almost every nation has empty rhetoric about completing the Doha round, but dont hold your breath expecting it to happen anytime soon.
Whats notable about Westerwelles list is that there is nothing about the overall burden of spending, even though Europe is saddled with bloated welfare states. There is nothing about high tax rates, even though most nations have punitive systems that discourage work, saving, investment, and entrepreneurship. There is nothing about the overall burden of regulation and red tape, particularly the supposedly pro-labor rules that actually discourage hiring (the Germans did implement successful reforms last decade, so he would have been in a strong position to urge other nations to copy those changes).
Heck, even the World Bank has been willing to point out that big government has failed in Europe. So its hardly a positive sign that a supposedly strong free market lawmaker is basically arguing that even more government is the way to boost growth on the continent.
It gets wearing listen to and reading folks who claim to be free market and then turn around and reject the very principles of free market economics. In this case he is suggesting the government can achieve a more efficient distribution. That's the antithesis of a free market. Market's exist and should be encouraged for the very reason they provide the most efficient distribution and exchange.
To reject that premise is to reject free market economics, since it leaves to door open for government to improve on the market and plan the distribution. This is the key argument of central planning; government can achieve a more efficient distribution than the market. F.A. Hayeck had this figured out a long time ago, this man needs to read the road to serfdom.
If the Nations of Europe become states under the thumb of the EU, it will be a rush to the lowest common denominator on the left. Germany can forget about free markets or free anything if they enslave themselves to a Federal EU. Greece’s failure and ensuing poverty will be pronounced as the glorious ideal not only for the EU, but for the New World Order.
Currently, we are stuggling with the same monster in our Federal government and rule of law. We have a Republican constitution and it is the only thing that stands between us and the fate of Europe if they surrender to a ruling EU. From there, we will be one “State”, as Europe will become one State, in global rule consisting of the lowest common denominator of the whole world’s mentality.
“doomed” as in what pray tell? If the whole economic house of cards in place right now collapsed, another more realistic framework would emerge. What do they think? Everything would disappear into a vast sinkhole?