What Candidate are you suggesting she could have gotten behind?? Not fruitcake Bachmann, No way Santorum, nobody that actually ran was much of anything.
Looking backwards, Perry may have been the best person that actually ran.
For Sure Sarah was my pick, I think she figured it out, people art just to fickle, one minute they love you and the next minute they are against you.
American people are actually stupid, there is not much hope
Any Conservative is better than no Conservative at all.
Ultimately, none of the candidates were the best person. Virtually all of them, especially Willard, had no business running, period.
It’s time to draft Scott Walker of Wisconsin for President.
I look forward to writing-in Sarah in the Calif. Rep. Primary.
Agree about Perry. I really don’t like to dwell on where we would be right now if he’d been successful in the debates and continued on his ascent. It makes me sick.
As for Sarah, every time she gets asked about Romney SHE looks ill. I think she will put off actually speaking his name until the last possible moment, but of course she’s going to support the eventual nominee.
I’ve seen a few people on this forum lately who share your sentiment about Perry having been our best candidate.
I was totally on board for Perry, but he was crucified on this forum and it was allowed to happen.
No sympathy here.
Looking backwards, Perry may have been the best person that actually ran.But if you remember, when Perry launched his campaign Palin came out practically the next day with her critique of "crony capitalism", as if to say "that's what this guy is all about".
I agree with you that Perry was probably the best we had (though definitely not as a campaigner). But you are way off if you think Palin saw it that way. Palin made some big, big mistakes in 2011... after doing some great things in 2010. It was a big downfall for her, in my opinion.