Posted on 05/21/2012 8:27:47 AM PDT by Nachum
It's bad enough when American tax dollars are blown on government-created debacles such as Solyndra and "Operation Fast and Furious." But at least in those instances the expenditures carried a bare modicum of democratic legitimacy.
What if, on the other hand, the U.S. Treasury was raided for billions of dollars, which were then redistributed to the rest of the world by an international bureaucracy headquartered in Kingston, Jamaica?
That's what will surely happen if the U.S. Senate gives its advice and consent to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, a deeply flawed treaty that was rejected by President Ronald Reagan in 1982. (The treaty was revived by President Clinton, who sent it to the Senate in 1994. It has languished there ever since.) The Obama administration is pushing for Senate action on the treaty, and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., is currently scheduling a series of hearings to extol the purported benefits of LOST, the first of which is set for May 23.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Would Willard do any different on this than has done Hussein?
Agenda 21 and the ‘green’ backdoor to world Marxism.
Not sure, as my crystal ball remains cloudy. Willard didn't appear to support it in '07, as he joined with Huckabee and (Fred) Thompson in opposing it.
Williard's affiliations with G.H. Bush do make one wonder what his ultimate support/opposition on this would be, though.
Would Willard do any different on this than has done Hussein?
Nope. He would do the same. Maybe not quite as fast though.
I thought this was Bush’s Law of the Sea Treaty?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.