Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
Why would he compliment Zero? For attacking Libya and ousting Gaddafi? But that would only makes sense if Libya was the guilty party - and not Syria or Iran. I'm sure there is some sort of liberal logic to all that. :-)

No, Zero will not attack Syria. That is as likely as Russia sending bombers over Tel Aviv. Yes, the Soviets might have done that in the midst of the cold war, but they learned by their mistakes.

Iran - possibly, but much, much more likely that 0 will finagle some kind of agreement that will allow the Mullahs to continue with their development of atomic bombs, and force the Israelis to accede.

80 posted on 05/21/2012 9:23:57 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: ScaniaBoy

HuffPo agrees, must be some meme-building going on. I love that term “stability” — libs and rads always use that one to justify supporting monstrous regimes, and forget all about it when they dogpile on some bloody uprising.

Why Stability in Syria Matters
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/claude-salhani/why-stability-in-syria-ma_b_1529301.html


81 posted on 05/21/2012 10:06:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson