Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney, Servant of the Right (view from the left -- for entertainment purposes only)
The American Prospect ^ | May 17, 2012 | Jamelle Bouie

Posted on 05/19/2012 9:02:01 AM PDT by Innovative

Those who believe the former Massachusetts governor would become a moderate once in office are wrong.

...conservatives aren't thrilled with Romney, even as they prepare to support him. But they aren't objecting to a marriage of convenience. Grover Norquist, founder of the anti-tax Americans for Tax Reform, explained Romney's acceptability in his speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference in February. "We just need a president who can sign the legislation that the Republican House and Senate pass," he said.

Romney's agenda mirrors that of House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, the Ayn Rand acolyte and anti-tax crusader from Wisconsin who, over the past two years, has crafted the blueprint for Republican domestic policy. "As president," Romney has said, "I look forward to working with Chairman Ryan and his House Republican colleagues to pass bold reforms that restore America's promise."

On the tax side, Romney promises a litany of tax reductions, beginning with a permanent extension of the George W. Bush tax cuts.

(Excerpt) Read more at prospect.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatives; elections; romney; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; romneymarriage; romneytaxes; taxes; viewfromtheleft
This is the Obama victory strategy: paint Romney as too far to the right for the general electorate, and paint him as too far to the left to conservatives, so we will end up with Obama, who will destroy the US as we know it, since he doesn't have to worry about reelection in his 2nd term.

Oh, boy, we should be really afraid of a Romney presidency -- better to stay home and let Obama win... (/sarcasm)

1 posted on 05/19/2012 9:02:11 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

I initially posted the link to the first page of the article, here is the link to the entire article on one page.

Quite entertaining.

http://prospect.org/article/mitt-romney-servant-right


2 posted on 05/19/2012 9:03:45 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Romney, timid backstabber, cannot beat Obama.

WHICH IS WHY THE MSM and DNC LOVE Milt.


3 posted on 05/19/2012 9:07:13 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Also from the article:

“The Mitt Romney of today has been more than clear about his goals. He wants low taxes, smaller government, a weaker safety net, and a larger military.”

Scary! (/sarc)


4 posted on 05/19/2012 9:07:32 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Anyone who believes that Romney is - or could be - a servant of the right after his performance in Massachusetts is sufficiently ignorant to be ignored.


5 posted on 05/19/2012 9:07:32 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Those who believe the former Massachusetts governor would become a moderate more left once in office are wrong right, because he already is a liberal so it wont be a stretch.
6 posted on 05/19/2012 9:08:47 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Pertinent point “the Romney of today”, who will be the Romney of tomorrow?
I mean we already know the Romney of yesterday - liberal.


7 posted on 05/19/2012 9:11:33 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

I posted this article, but only put it into the “Elections” category.

I DID NOT PUT IT INTO BREAKING NEWS.

I asked the AM to please remove it from Breaking News.


8 posted on 05/19/2012 9:12:40 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Keep FR Running
Let's get to Yellow!

9 posted on 05/19/2012 9:29:10 AM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative
“Instead of expanding the government,” he declared, “I will shrink it. Instead of raising taxes, I will cut them. Instead of adding regulations, I will scale them back.”

Just like he did in Massachusetts...

Severely conservative and because of it he just can't help himself.

10 posted on 05/19/2012 9:42:15 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"As U.S. real output grew 13 percent between 2002 and 2006, Massachusetts trailed at 9 percent.
* Manufacturing employment fell 7 percent nationwide those years, but sank 14 percent under Romney, placing Massachusetts 48th among the states.
* Between fall 2003 and autumn 2006, U.S. job growth averaged 5.4 percent, nearly three times Massachusetts' anemic 1.9 percent pace.
* While 8 million Americans over age 16 found work between 2002 and 2006, the number of employed Massachusetts residents actually declined by 8,500 during those years.
"Massachusetts was the only state to have failed to post any gain in its pool of employed residents," professors Sum and McLaughlin concluded.
In an April 2003 meeting with the Massachusetts congressional delegation in Washington, Romney failed to endorse President Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal."

[Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card - America's Governors, 2004.]


11 posted on 05/19/2012 9:46:23 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Laughable. I have had people try this one me. You can just shoot them down in about 1 minute by mentioning the fact Romney is a former governor of MA (a well known hotbed of extremist right wingers) and the fact the TEA Party folks hate Mittens.

What this article shows is the pretzels Obama voters will twist themselves into justifying a vote for Barry. The dedicated Obama voters are beyond serious debate. Nothing you can say will change their minds because anyone seriously considering voting for obama with his record as POTUS is delusional


12 posted on 05/19/2012 9:58:06 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

13 posted on 05/19/2012 10:01:12 AM PDT by mkjessup (Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

It’s really curious that Romney is hated just as much by some folks here as he is over at DUmmieLand.


14 posted on 05/19/2012 10:12:28 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Julia: another casualty of the "War on Poverty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Doesn't matter what anyone says at this point. I won't vote for a pro-abortion, anti-gun, big-government liberal. And that includes Romney.

/johnny

15 posted on 05/19/2012 10:14:50 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

If we could just get Hillary to challenge Mitt at the Republocrat Convention!

ABO Guys!

/s


16 posted on 05/19/2012 10:24:20 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of Our Troops Pray they Win every Fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

What I think is the GOP can’t just say they aren’t going to run a candidate against Obama so, they pick someone the voters will hate.


17 posted on 05/19/2012 10:28:03 AM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

If you don’t want to vote for Romney Fine. But get your butt to the polls because there are a lot of conservatives that we need to vote for.


18 posted on 05/19/2012 10:49:30 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

If you don’t want to vote for Romney Fine. But get your butt to the polls because there are a lot of conservatives that we need to vote for. BTW I am a Geologist also..


19 posted on 05/19/2012 10:50:37 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

If you don’t want to vote for Romney Fine. But get your butt to the polls because there are a lot of conservatives that we need to vote for.


20 posted on 05/19/2012 10:52:16 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

You didn’t get it, did you?

I found it amusing that the left is so desperate they are trying to paint Romney as a far right-winger.

They must be terrified that most people, including moderate Dems will find Romney moderate enough, while finding Obama extreme leftist, that they will actually vote for Romney and Obama gets defeated.

This is what everyone should keep in mind: Romney is a middle-of-the-roader, while Obama is a far-leftist, intent on destroying the US as we know it. Obama is working hard on income redistribution, and total government control over individuals, which IS communism, even though he doesn’t call it that. When it walks like a duck and all that.


21 posted on 05/19/2012 10:57:25 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“They must be terrified that most people, including moderate Dems will find Romney moderate enough, while finding Obama extreme leftist, that they will actually vote for Romney and Obama gets defeated.”

That about sums it up. There is one moderate in the race and it is Mittems. That that fact will get out terrifies the dims. What also has the dems worried is Romney’s 87% approval rating among GOP voters which shows only the fringe contrarians are planning on sitting this one out.

Getting the kenyan out of the White House is all that matters right now and nearly everyone sees that.


22 posted on 05/19/2012 11:29:36 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
This is what everyone should keep in mind: Romney is a middle-of-the-roader,...

What? Your account is still active? Heavens to Murgatroyd. Seize him! & etc. /s/

23 posted on 05/19/2012 11:29:55 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Photobucket
24 posted on 05/19/2012 11:50:08 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Romney is not even conservative enough to be called a moderate. I judge these people based on their records.


25 posted on 05/19/2012 12:20:12 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

“It’s really curious that Romney is hated just as much by some folks here as he is over at DUmmieLand.”

Not really, given that he has espoused both sides of so many issues.


26 posted on 05/19/2012 12:44:24 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
You didn’t get it, did you?

au contraire mon fraire, I did indeed 'get it'. You are among the many deluded souls who have deliberately chosen to shove Mitt-Witt's record as Governor of Assachusetts down the memory hole, ignore his past statements and proclamations, all because he "isn't 0bama".

Give your head a shake. America is on the road to ruin due to a Marxist ideologue in the White House, pouring socialism down our throats. Even IF by some miraculous development, we were to see President-elect Romney taking the Oath of Office on 20 January 2013, we will still be force fed that bottle of socialism, except it will be served up in stylish crystal goblets as befits someone of his stature and breeding.

Romney is the nominee this time around because the GOP elites determined early on that it was "his turn", just like McStain got his "turn" in '08, and Dole got his "turn" in '96.

Our choice is between having the fangs of a Brown Recluse sinking into our flesh, or that of a Black Widow.

Go on, stick your hand in there and find out for yourself.
27 posted on 05/19/2012 12:45:48 PM PDT by mkjessup (Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Romney is a LEFT-of-TED-Kennedy Liberal.
But he is a LIAR and the GOPe, DNC, and Soros LOVE him for it.

IT’S UNANIMOUS FOR RINO ROMNEY
From the Kennedy Seat in Massachusetts to the entire DNC

Mitt Romney wins much coveted Jimmy Carter endorsement

Gore Praises Romney's 'Climate Protection Plan'

Carville(D):
"It's a feel-good story, this Romney thing.
Romney is an ascendant guy
."

Sen. John Kerry (D) to Don Imus on RomneyCARE:
"I like this health care bill".

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) on RomneyCARE:
"To come up with a bipartisan plan in this polarized environment is commendable."

George Soros Wants Mitt Romney



28 posted on 05/19/2012 1:04:51 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“Too far to the right”. Tax reductions. Bush tax cuts. The extremism! Oh, no!/s


29 posted on 05/19/2012 1:08:20 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

When it comes to Mitt Romney, three principles need to be kept in mind: 1) Mitt Romney will say anything to get elected, 2) if you’re inclined to believe what he says, remember principle #1, and 3) actions speak louder than words.


30 posted on 05/19/2012 1:08:24 PM PDT by CommerceComet (Obama vs. Romney - clear evidence that our nation has been judged by God and found wanting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

http://pjmedia.com/rogerkimball/2012/05/16/obama-by-the-numbers/?singlepage=true


31 posted on 05/19/2012 1:40:37 PM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

http://pjmedia.com/rogerkimball/2012/05/16/obama-by-the-numbers/?singlepage=true


32 posted on 05/19/2012 1:41:33 PM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor
If you don’t want to vote for Romney Fine. But get your butt to the polls because there are a lot of conservatives that we need to vote for.

Needs to be repeated and often.

We need a repeat of 2010 in the House and Senate. It gives new meaning to the term *house cleaning*.

33 posted on 05/19/2012 2:37:29 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I think the article is directed at the Romney democrats.


34 posted on 05/19/2012 2:53:31 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
"We need a repeat of 2010 in the House and Senate. It gives new meaning to the term *house cleaning*."

Pack the House and Senate.


35 posted on 05/19/2012 2:58:06 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]





- Several years ago on a Free Republic sidebar internal poll 15% picked Hillary Clinton as their own personal choice to be the next US President.....


Can you spot the stealthy FReepers on this Free Republic thread that were among the 15% of those sleepers that picked Hillary?





36 posted on 05/19/2012 6:04:11 PM PDT by devolve (------ ---- ---------toss_subhumans_in_Hannibal*s_wild_boar_pit----------- ---------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Same here. No Romney. No Obama.


37 posted on 05/19/2012 8:54:03 PM PDT by arderkrag (ABOs are Romneybot trolls. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Romney is playing NOT TO LOSE. Football or Politics, playing NOT TO LOSE rarely produces a victory.

BTW, McCain played NOT TO LOSE in 2008. Nuff said.


38 posted on 05/19/2012 9:24:07 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

It is a false assumption that Romney will beat Obama.

Romney is playing NOT TO LOSE.

Football or Politics, playing NOT TO LOSE rarely produces a victory.

It is time to DUMP ROMNEY, as he is clueless on how to beat Obama.

BTW, McCain played NOT TO LOSE in 2008. Nuff said.


39 posted on 05/19/2012 9:39:29 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
It is time to DUMP ROMNEY

In favor of whom?

40 posted on 05/19/2012 9:40:15 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

DUMP ROMNEY and replace him with a stellar Dark Horse.

IF Romney is probably going to lose to Obama, THEN it is incumbent upon the RNC to intervene and declare an OPEN Convention, regardless of the Primary delegates that Romney has.

Continued accumulation of Primary delegates in the remaining State Primaries is the key to improving Paul’s chances of forcing the GOP-E to hold an OPEN Convention in Tampa.

Paul will then have completed his main task in this Primary: giving the delegates the freedom to DUMP ROMNEY!

My goal is to defeat the insanity of Keyensian Economics in “both” of our very sorry political parties THIS YEAR!

This can be accomplished by the Delegates choosing a stellar Dark Horse Nominee, such as R-Rep. West of Florida, to slaughter Obama in a November Landslide.

It is not enough to beat Obama, he must be smashed in a huge landslide to repudiate his Marxist ideas for America!

Romney is not Warrior enough to do so.

The key is to FORCE the GOP-E to allow for an OPEN Convention in Tampa. Without an OPEN Convention the SOS of INSANE Federal Over-Spending will keep America on the same crowded track with Greece, and Kalifornia.

There are over 15, 000, 000, 000, 000 reasons why spending more money this year than was taken in during the previous year is an INSANE path to financial destruction.

Neither Obama or Romney have presented a plan to spend our Federal dollars in a non-insane manner.

For example, the GOP Elite have stood in line to endorse Romney, to endorse “The Ryan Budget,” and to compromise-away every opportunity to reduce Federal Spending.

I included the Ryan Budget, because Rep. Paul Ryan himself says that his “Budget” will balance in 30 YEARS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW, I added those exclamation points, because both you and I know that Ryan’s budget will NEVER balance, and thus will never be a fact. The exclamation points are just for volume emphasis.


41 posted on 05/19/2012 9:59:04 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

When you think Grover represents conservatives, that might be your first clue you’re talking out your @$$.


42 posted on 05/20/2012 1:12:57 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Romney, timid backstabber, cannot beat Obama.

WHICH IS WHY THE MSM and DNC LOVE Milt.

butttt he EVOLVED!

43 posted on 05/20/2012 5:16:11 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“Mitt Romney, Servant of the Right”. If only he truly was(sigh).


44 posted on 05/20/2012 11:58:59 AM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

BTTT


45 posted on 05/21/2012 4:17:39 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

DUMP ROMNEY and replace him with a stellar Dark Horse.

IF Romney is probably going to lose to Obama, THEN it is incumbent upon the RNC to intervene and declare an OPEN Convention, regardless of the Primary delegates that Romney has.

Continued accumulation of Primary delegates in the remaining State Primaries is the key to improving Paul’s chances of forcing the GOP-E to hold an OPEN Convention in Tampa.

Paul will then have completed his main task in this Primary: giving the delegates the freedom to DUMP ROMNEY!

My goal is to defeat the insanity of Keyensian Economics in “both” of our very sorry political parties THIS YEAR!

This can be accomplished by the Delegates choosing a stellar Dark Horse Nominee, such as R-Rep. Allen West of Florida, to slaughter Obama in a November Landslide.

It is not enough to beat Obama, he must be smashed in a huge landslide to repudiate his Marxist ideas for America!

Romney is not Warrior enough to do so.

The key is to FORCE the GOP-E to allow for an OPEN Convention in Tampa. Without an OPEN Convention the SOS of INSANE Federal Over-Spending will keep America on the same crowded track with Greece, and Kalifornia.

There are over 15, 000, 000, 000, 000 reasons why spending more money this year than was taken in during the previous year is an INSANE path to financial destruction.

Neither Obama or Romney have presented a plan to spend our Federal dollars in a non-insane manner.

For example, the GOP Elite have stood in line to endorse Romney, to endorse “The Ryan Budget,” and to compromise-away every opportunity to reduce Federal Spending.

I included the Ryan Budget, because Rep. Paul Ryan himself says that his “Budget” will balance in 30 YEARS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW, I added those exclamation points, because both you and I know that Ryan’s budget will NEVER balance, and thus will never be a fact. The exclamation points are just for volume emphasis.

______________________

The main point of my post is as follows: In order to DUMP ROMNEY there must be an OPEN, or “Bartered” Convention.

Ron Paul, Santorum and Newt are our best hopes to achieve an OPEN Convention because they have the most Delegates to force the Romney Delegates to approve of an OPEN Convention.

Since RP is the only active Candidate left standing, he has the best chance of forcing the RNC to have an OPEN Convention in Tampa.

With an OPEN Convention, NONE of the Primary Candidates stand a chance of becoming the Nominee, except Romney.

That possibility must be countered by a stellar Dark Horse, that is someone that has not run in this years Primary Campaign.

Otherwise Romney will follow the same stupid path as McCain and lose to Obama “much to the surprise of the GOP-E.”

Ron Paul, Santorum and Newt were rejected by Primary voters, and would be re-soundly rejected by the voters in the National Election. Thus, their main value is to force an OPEN Convention.

The Convention Delegates then would have a chance to choose a Nominee who could easily defeat Obama.

I had earlier supported R-Sc Sen. Jim DeMint, but he will not leave the Senate. Now I support R-Fla. Rep. Allen West. Rep. Allen West is a retired US Army Colonel, straight-talking Conservative, AND is the only non-welcome member of the Congressional Black Caucus, (the Libs hate him).

There are many other Republican non-RINO Dark Horses who would make excellent Dark Horse Nominees.

The DUMP ROMNEY Campaign requires an OPEN or “Bartered” Convention in Tampa.

Make your voice and vote count towards an OPEN Convention in Tampa, Florida!

BTW, Nominee Allen West WOULD be Florida’s favorite son in November - - - .


46 posted on 05/21/2012 1:27:57 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson