Skip to comments.Vatican Slams Pro-Abortion Supporters For Using ďThe Same Arguments As The Naziís Did To Promote
Posted on 05/08/2012 3:12:49 PM PDT by Nachum
Via Daily Mail:
The Vaticans semi-official newspaper has angered supporters of euthanasia and abortions by suggesting they apply the same justifications that were used by the Nazis to champion their murderous eugenics programme.
The controversial claim that they believe in the survival of the fittest concept, was made in an article on the front page of todays issue of LOsservatore RomanO.
It was published in response to the recent Italian translation of a 1920 book titled Allowing the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Living, by two German scholars, Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche.
It is written by Lucetta Scaraffia, an Italian historian who frequently has work published in the Vatican paper, reports the Huffington Post.
(Excerpt) Read more at weaselzippers.us ...
Good one for the Church.
It’s scary isn’t it?
Beck is right, the Nazis are back.
Full blown self proclaimed Nazis are now in the Greek government. We should be afraid, very afraid.
Why not planned parenthood represents the US branch of Auschwitz
Why not. Planned parenthood represents the US branch of Auschwitz
This is really really really gonna p!$$-off the “catholic” baby-killers.
Oh, no, we can't have that!
p.s. One Nazi, two or more Nazis. The apostrophe has to go.
Life unworthy of living.
The Socialist Utopians continue to bang the drum of death on demand.
“This is really really really gonna p!$$-off the catholic baby-killers.”
Professors: Babies Dont Know Theyre Killed in Abortions
The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.
Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a person in the sense of subject of a moral right to life. We take person to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her. This means that many non-human animals and mentally retarded human individuals are persons, but that all the individuals who are not in the condition of attributing any value to their own existence are not persons. Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life. Indeed, many humans are not considered subjects of a right to life: spare embryos where research on embryo stem cells is permitted, fetuses where abortion is permitted, criminals where capital punishment is legal.
Hitler and his NAZIs justified.
Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
The Golden Dawn are not Nazi’s per say, but are more of a “classical” fascists group.
And remember the agenda of who is reporting the news.
Talk to the Israelis
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Readers in the DM comments are consistently red arrowing prolife comments. We know where the Brits are headed.
Which is odd, because most DM readers tend to be pro life.
I daresay FRiends the game is on. But its probably going to be awfully long and drawn out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.