Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jake Tapper to Carney: How about you cut the crap and admit that Obama supports gay marriage?
Hotair ^ | 05/07/2012 | AllahPundit

Posted on 05/07/2012 2:15:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Via the Examiner, what are the odds that Joe Biden and Arne Duncan and, oh, 99.9 percent of the rest of the liberal intelligentsia support legalizing gay marriage but The One doesn’t? It’s getting harder every day to sustain this charade, which is why Axelrod is suddenly eager to change the subject:

Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod on Monday pivoted sharply to Mitt Romney’s views on gay marriage when reporters pressed him on the president’s stance on the issue.

On a conference call with reporters, Axelrod said there’s a “clear distinction” between Obama’s views on gay-rights issues and the presumptive GOP nominee’s views.

“There couldn’t be a starker contrast on this issue than with Gov. Romney, who has funded efforts to roll back marriage laws in California and other places,” Axelrod told reporters on the call.

In turning to Romney, Axelrod ducked a question from a reporter on whether Obama supports gay marriage.

Actually, I can’t decide whether the back-to-back Biden/Duncan endorsements are a case of those guys going rogue or something they’re coordinating with O’s campaign to test the waters on Obama himself possibly backing gay marriage. He wants to avoid that if he can lest his position alienate a key constituency (he’s already in trouble with seniors), but maybe he can’t avoid it. Like Chuck Todd says, the less “Wall Street money” Obama takes in, the more important “gay money” and other fundraising sources become. Beyond that, if the economy continues to stall, The One will become increasingly desperate to change the subject — so much so that he might prefer to roll the dice on backing gay marriage in hopes of creating a sensational distraction. It’d be a risky play, but if the new post-austerity Europe performs the way everyone expects, the odds of the U.S. economy recovering before November will deteriorate and he’ll be a very long longshot to win. A culture-war campaign could be his Hail Mary pass. Anyone seriously believe it would work, though?

Two clips here, one of Tapper and the other of Carney once again trying to explain Obama’s position on same-sex marriage. I think he’s saying that O supports civil unions and that he opposes any state attempts to repeal domestic partnership rights once they’ve been granted, i.e. a one-way ratchet, but I’m not sure Carney’s 100% confident that he understands Obama’s position on this either. Oh, and as for Axelrod’s point about Romney opposing gay rights, here’s a PDF reminder of where Mitt stood circa 1994. Is the real Romney a gay-marriage opponent who was pretending to support “full equality” then in order to get elected in a blue state or is he a gay-marriage supporter who’s pretending to oppose full equality now in order to get elected in a purplish nation?

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhohomosexualagenda; bhopress; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; jaketapper; obama; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: kabar

The Constitution has been getting ignored for a century now. I think it started with the Civil war, and most surely the “Federal Reserve” in 1913.

I first noticed it in my lifetime when they set a national 55 mph speed limit (55 saves lives...)

The Fedgov did not have the constitutional authority to pass that law, so they withheld Federal highway funds from states that did not comply. I call that blackmail.


21 posted on 05/08/2012 7:37:53 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

You are right. Federal money always comes with strings attached whether it is highway money or education money or health care money.


22 posted on 05/08/2012 7:52:20 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I’m sure that any true Constitutional scholar would understand that the Constitution was written with a purpose of not letting the Fedgov use funds to usurp state’s rights or people’s rights as well.

What do I know anyway. My grandfather and father went overseas to fight tyranny with cartridge boxes, while today I see the ballot boxes as an epic failure to prevent it here.

In the election before last, I stood in line for an hour and was told I could not vote. Motor voter had worked for me before. I called the fraud hotline because their is no race pimp machine to march for my disenfranchised white self.

I was supposed to be given a provisional ballot, and the election workers failed to provide it.

I had moved again before the last election, and the same thing happened, but I was prepared (sort of). I asked for a provisional ballet, and the poll worker told me that my vote would not be counted, it was just to make me feel better about voting.

The Going On Progressive party is just forcing establishment hacks on us anyway, so why bother? I might as well stay home and get involved in an authentic activity like watching “pro” wrestling.


23 posted on 05/08/2012 10:34:21 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson