Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia official warns of pre-emptive strike against U.S.-led Europe missile defense
Haaetz | AP ^ | 3/5/12

Posted on 05/03/2012 9:23:19 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Moscow rejects Washington's claim that a planned missile defense system is solely to deal with any Iranian missile threat and has voiced fears it will eventually threaten Russia.

Russia's top military officer has threatened to carry out a pre-emptive strike on U.S.-led NATO missile defense facilities in Eastern Europe if Washington goes ahead with its controversial plan to build a missile shield.

President Dmitry Medvedev said last year that Russia will retaliate militarily if it does not reach an agreement with the United States and NATO on the missile defense system.

Chief of General Staff Nikolai Makarov went even further Thursday. "A decision to use destructive force pre-emptively will be taken if the situation worsens," he said at an international conference attended by senior U.S. and NATO officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at haaretz.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: 0bamasfault; missile; missiledefense; nato; obamasfault; preemptive; russia

1 posted on 05/03/2012 9:23:32 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It’s sort of like a reverse Cuban Missile Crisis, with Barry having the role of Kruschev.


2 posted on 05/03/2012 9:27:51 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; tx_eggman
I guess Obama isn't caving fast enough for them.
3 posted on 05/03/2012 9:37:12 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The Russians are upset about DEFENSIVE weapons. That can only mean that they plan to use their OFFENSIVE weapons. Of course, Barry Noballs will cave.


4 posted on 05/03/2012 9:46:29 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

A huge difference between this system and the Cuban missile crisis is that the anti-missile weapons are not nuclear.


5 posted on 05/03/2012 10:10:56 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Just wondering, what chance is there Russia will launch WWIII over some defensive missiles in Europe?

Imho this is meant as clumsy cover for Obama, to justify his “flexibility”.


6 posted on 05/03/2012 10:28:05 AM PDT by Andrei Bulba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I think it has been said but how do you threaten anyone with defensive weapons?


7 posted on 05/03/2012 11:56:26 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"Russia's top military officer has threatened to carry out a pre-emptive strike on U.S.-led NATO missile defense facilities in Eastern Europe if Washington goes ahead with its controversial plan to build a missile shield. "

Awww ... but I thought that Hillary Clinton "reset" relations with the Russians in 2009, and that the Russians were now to be trusted, and that pink ponies with wings could fly ...

[humming Kumbayah to myself now as I dream of world peace and whirled peas].

8 posted on 05/03/2012 12:03:57 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The Russkies have seen how well the Arrow system works in Israel and they are terrified to think that their offensive capability might be neutralized.


9 posted on 05/03/2012 12:06:27 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
It's almost as if the Russians see Obama as being weak.

Very weak.

10 posted on 05/03/2012 12:33:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tom h

Actually, it’s the RIM-161 Standard Missile 3.

“On July 3, 2010, Poland and the United States signed an amended agreement for missile defense under whose terms land-based SM-3 systems would be installed in Poland. This configuration was accepted as a tested and available alternative to missile interceptors that were proposed during the Bush administration but which are still under development. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, present at the signing in Kraków along with Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski, stressed that the missile defense program was aimed at deterring threats from Iran, and posed no challenge to Russia.

-From Wikipedia.


11 posted on 05/03/2012 12:34:22 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Didn't we once offer them access to the same technology to help set up their own missile shield? I thought I remember that as something from the Reagan era...

I could be mis-remembering though...

12 posted on 05/03/2012 12:36:28 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba
You don't understand Russians. They just might attack over this. The fear is that they would not be able to respond to an attack.

Russia has been attacked by every “friend” they ever had. They do not trust us, and never will trust anyone. Put the missile systems in Western Europe, outside their sphere of influence.

Russia will attack otherwise.

13 posted on 05/03/2012 12:38:41 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba; NFHale; Gilbo_3; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne
Imho this is meant as clumsy cover for Obama, to justify his “flexibility”.

DING DING DING!


14 posted on 05/03/2012 3:54:05 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
what an election setup. our wonderful leader will show such strength and diplomacy and save the day. wanna bet?
15 posted on 05/03/2012 4:03:31 PM PDT by rlbedfor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

This is insane...”pre-emptive strike” on NATO?

They must be feeling their gonads or something...


16 posted on 05/03/2012 4:06:30 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson