Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoLibZone; Cincinatus' Wife; montanajoe; Jim Robinson

I try very hard to find the truth before I post...the entire truth...a portion of it doesn’t suffice.

Like my tagline says, so once I believe I’ve found it, I hold to and speak without fer.

Both Romney and Obama are horrible.

I believe the facts to date, and projected into the near future, demonstrate Obama clearly to be the greater danger to our survival as America.

I agree Newt is correct on that point.

To reach that is easy, imo, but you have to extract the political parties out of it, the arguments between conservatives and RINOS, Mitt’s flip flopping, lying, etc. And nobody knows the truth on Mitt better than Newt, and Governor Perry. They chronicled it. They suffered their fates, in part, from it.

When you pull that away from the comparison to the Obama threat to our survival, and imagine a second Obama term with little constraint...he will do as he pleases without regard to Congress, and we don’t yet have the Senate flat out assured, either, and his appeasement of enemies and determination to remake this nation come hell or high water, there you have it.

I so despise Romney the politician I wouldn’t vote for him unless, personally, my back was to the wall in a drop dead swing state that was hanging by a thread to go either way, and the race was razor thin tight.

I would then consider voting strategically, for my nation to have a second chance beyond Obama.

I find Ron Paul repugnant in some very important ways. I understand that FReepers have voted for him, for instance in VA, to try to ball things up for Romney and the E machine, who otherwise have zero use for Paul.

In Texas, he will be the only non Romney on the ballot who hasn’t dropped out.

I will either vote Paul...ugh...or not vote.

The truth is, uncomfortable as it may be to some of you, there’s little difference in it being ok to vote for Ron Paul in certain narrow circumstances for strategic reasons, and it being defensible to vote for Mitt in certain narrow circumstances for strategic reasons.

Sure, you can attack my seperate defense of possibley voting for either Romney against Obama or Paul against Romney, but when you take them together and try to say one is fine and the other is traitorous to the conservative cause, that can’t be true.

Both are forbotten, or both are defensible. Think about it.

I can name what is reprehensible about Paul, or even crazy, but that’s not my purpose. If you don’t know by now, I can’t help you.


52 posted on 05/03/2012 7:09:55 AM PDT by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette; All

The country would sink under an Obama Supreme Court (not to mention his love of Executive Orders, Czars and allowing federal agencies to act outside of Congressional approval)...

We keep the House, take the Senate and White House and raise hell each and every time our public servants turn around in order to keep them honest (well, you know....).

Work locally and support conservatives in your area and states.

Never give up.


74 posted on 05/03/2012 9:46:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson