[Marine_Uncle]

From the New York Slimes article: "His idea has drawn withering criticism from other scientists, who cite errors in his papers and say proof is lacking. Enough evidence is already in hand, they say, to rule out the powerful cooling effect from clouds that would be needed to offset the increase of greenhouse gases."

The bull shit just keeps building up in the stables. What scientist?

[TigersEye]

"...Enough evidence is already in hand, they say, to rule out the powerful cooling effect from clouds that would be needed to offset the increase of greenhouse gases."

OK, does he cite that "evidence?" Whether he does or not let's stipulate, for sake of argument, that the cooling effect from clouds that would be needed to offset the increase of greenhouse gases isn't enough. What empirical evidence does he have to explain this disparity between empirical temperature data and Climate Model theory?