Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: INVAR

Why not take your jots and tittles back to the bible and figure out how your November vote isn’t an act of worship. By that time all there will be left in any practical sense is naked choice between two sinners. The time to prepare was months, years ago.

You are simply trying to soothe your own conscience from the consequences of what you propose. Why not just confess that you’re thinking that if America is going to have evil, why not get the most evil and get it done as soon as possible.


84 posted on 04/30/2012 4:22:37 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
You are simply trying to soothe your own conscience from the consequences of what you propose. Why not just confess that you’re thinking that if America is going to have evil, why not get the most evil and get it done as soon as possible.

That would be wishful thinking on your part, perhaps some bizarre form of projection.

Evil is evil. There is no grading system of sin with God. I suppose if you wanted to toss in Abomination in there you could - and both Romney and Obama share the distinction of supporting and promoting such. I've repented of compromising with evil for expedience's sake, because the fruits prove, it's still evil as far as God, our Principles and Foundations are concerned.

90 posted on 04/30/2012 4:32:35 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Why not just confess that you’re thinking that if America is going to have evil, why not get the most evil and get it done as soon as possible.

Some of us realize Romney will do more harm than Obama:

1)He'll move the Republican party significantly to the left. Why would Romney be inclined to govern conservatively if he know conservatives like you are going to vote Republican no matter what? Why would the establishment pay any attention the Tea Party or grassroots when they know they can get away with putting up the most liberal nominee they can find and conservatives will still vote for him or her?

2) The party in the White House almost always loses seats in Congress and at the state level. That will be even more true with Romney in the White House when he signs off on liberal legislation that fails. The choice is growing Republican majority in Congress with Obama in the White House or a shrinking Republican minority with Romney in it. I'll take the former. Romney endangers all the gains made by conservatives in 2010. After he was done as governor, Republicans held less seats in the Massachusetts legislation than at any time since the civil war.

3) RINOs are far more likely to get their arms twisted and agree to tax increases, "climate change" legislation and other liberal legislation with Romney in the White House than with Obama in it.

4) There is even a scenario where Romney could move SCOTUS to the left. Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia likely won't retire with Obama in the White House. They might if Romney is elected. No one that knows Romney's record on judges would be surprised if he put another David Souter or Sandra Day O'Connor on SCOTUS. I'd bet whoever he chooses will support gay marriage as a right.

141 posted on 04/30/2012 12:33:54 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson