Posted on 04/25/2012 6:43:37 PM PDT by neverdem
In a nation of cowards, such as ours, self-defense is always under attack.
New Florida Law:
“All victims and potential victims are required under penalty of imprisonment, to be able to outrun any and all potential criminal adversaries.”
They don’t come much stupider than Bloomberg.
Bottom line:
Because of anecdotal incidents which aren’t significant enough to skew any statistic, or are outright fabricated, the “Surrender First” crowd wants the CRIMINALS to dictate what YOUR actions will be in a confrontation, rather than giving YOU the power as a law abiding citizen who’s rights have been violated to decide the best way to respond to the threat.
They’re telling you, “Run, peasant”. Think any of their bodyguards would respond this way in the face of a threat?
Another “hug-a-thug” feel-good effort not grounded in reality. These people are evil.
What is our country coming to????
Now there's two popular issues. Run hard on that, Dems!
The libs are always waiting for something to exploit, it doesn’t matter if it’s relevant or not.
The prosecution better have indisputable physical evidence negating Zimmerman’s accounting of the killing at this point.
As it now stands, it looks very much like a politically induced prosecution.
That would be a very bad thing right about now.....
Dershowitz said it may be a criminal act and advised the prosecutor to get an attorney.
‘it’ = the prosecution of Zimmerman
Making a Hash of the Second Amendment
Scrounging around for Asian workers (Marion Barry again)
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
The beauty of being a Democrat is that you just don’t have to have any evidence to support your arguments. You just have to say if you do it my way things will be so much better. Or you say look at all of this suffering that would be avoided.
Of course the press just picks up their inflammatory rhetoric and prints it uncritically or if they print any arguments from the opposition it is printed near the end of the article in the most condescending fashion possible.
>>The law’s opponents note that the annual number of justifiable homicides in Florida (excluding police shootings) nearly tripled after the law was passed in 2005, from an average of 12 between 2000 and 2004 to an average of 35 between 2006 and 2010.
I would observe that some people just need shootin’. And in a state the size of Florida, it is probably larger than 35 a year.
?
Why? Is Holder going to prosecute?
?
Why? Is Holder going to prosecute?
I will if I have too, but it is not a situation I, or any other normal, decent person actively desires to experience.
I would be unable to come up with 15K cash to “bond” myself out of jail, if I was forced to kill someone in self defense.
Hense the SYG laws, that really were designed to reign in frivolous prosecutions.
EPIC FAIL..
Thanks for the ping!
Well, certainly! You wouldn’t want to interfere with anyone’s legitimate career choice, would you? /sarcasm;)
Your Second Amendment right is under attack, as are other rights. The obvious plan by the bipartisan, political/regulator class is to create racial tensions through troublemaking policy pressures on police/courts and eventually cause incidents. Then, they’ll make their new legislative moves. Don’t take the bait, folks. The political people of today are afraid of you because of the economy and some of their other activities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.