Skip to comments.
Supreme Court takes up Arizona immigration law
Yahoo! News ^
| April 25, 2012
| Mark Sherman
Posted on 04/25/2012 9:57:32 AM PDT by DBeers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks DBeers.
"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.
21
posted on
04/25/2012 4:30:41 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: tsowellfan
If Arizona cannot do this then, California must be banned from having stricter air pollution regulations for cars I was thinking along the same lines. What about drug laws?
Robbing a bank is a FEDERAL offense. It would be illegal for a police officer to arrest the culprit if the Arizona law fails. The Feds would have to hunt him down and capture him themselves. For the state - it would be hands off!
All those who have been arrested for a FEDERAL offense in the past by the state could sue, right? It was out of their "jurisdiction."
To: copaliscrossing
Can someone explain to me the difference between Kagan recusing herself in this case and not recusing herself in the Obamacare case? The decision is already made on Obamacare, 1070 has some areas of disagreement. </sarcasm>
23
posted on
04/25/2012 10:36:27 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(I will not vote for Romney period, and by election day you won't like him either.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson