Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich to WCNC: 'We’ll continue to campaign'
WCNC ^ | 4-24-12 | staff

Posted on 04/24/2012 6:24:18 PM PDT by VinL

Despite speculation that he might drop out of the presidential race soon, Newt Gingrich said he is pressing on during an exclusive interview with NewsChannel 36 anchor Dave Wagner Tuesday afternoon.

“These reports somehow get exaggerated,” Gingrich. “We have 23 events this week…What I did say was that we are going to evaluate actively and honestly what has happened here.”

Gingrich spent part of Tuesday at the Billy Graham library with his wife and campaign staff. He is expected at an event Tuesday night in Concord as well.

“Under any circumstance we are going to be at every single event we outlined this week and our expectation is that we’ll continue to campaign until Romney gets to 1144 delegates.

“I think it is very important for the voters to be the people who decide, not the news media or the campaign consultants,” Gingrich added.

Click here to listen to the entire interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at wcnc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: de2012; delaware; gingrich; newt2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-116 next last
To: Idaho_Cowboy
Since when did it become a bad sign to fight to the end. I want Newt to fight till the bitter end to stop the two socialist who want to wreck our country.

The end has passed. It's like when a professional football team is down 48-0 in the 4th quarter with 5 minutes left. You pull your best players and don't risk injury because there is no possible way to win the game. You live to fight another day. There is no math that makes Newt the nominee. There is no serious path to stopping Romney from getting the delegates he needs. Newt is not running a real campaign now and hasn't been for awhile. He is collecting cash from people to help pay down his debt, and running around trying to enjoy the spotlight before it fades away.

51 posted on 04/24/2012 8:09:48 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

George Washington won because he fought in the right places at the right time. Fighting to the bitter end in the wrong places, or fighting in the wrong time and place, can destroy your campaign.

Newt is Braxton Bragg. Taking soldiers, men, manpower and money, holding what wasn’t going to be lost and taking them away from Lee, when he needed every man he could get. Sure, the odds were against Lee, but you need to put the manpower where it can actually defeat the enemy, not waste them elsewhere with Bragg.

Now that Lee was defeated in PA, Bragg holds GA and SC, but he will be utterly crushed. Defeat at this point is inevitable. Thanks Newt.


52 posted on 04/24/2012 8:12:03 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Milt Romney is Benedict Arnold.

If you want George Washington, Romney is elsewhere.


53 posted on 04/24/2012 8:19:06 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks VinL.


54 posted on 04/24/2012 8:29:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Well, if you decide you are defeated you are. If everybody thought like that, we might as well give up before we get started, you can always come up with a good reason to quit. How many years have we been shrugging our shoulders and saying “Oh well, we’ll just try again four years from now.” This might be the last ball game for the U.S. I don’t think we can survive with any semblance of freedom if we don’t put an end to Obamacare and socialist policies. There might not be another day to live to fight to. Let’s put some points on the board.


55 posted on 04/24/2012 8:34:45 PM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Certainty of death. Small chance of success what are we waiting for. Gimili - Lord of the Rings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Obama would love to invite this jerk to a BBQ, woof.


56 posted on 04/24/2012 8:37:11 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Newt also said tonight in his speech Conservatives need to be 100% behind the nominee. And he knows who the nominee will be.


57 posted on 04/24/2012 8:37:52 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Entering this as a Santorum supporter I tend to agree with you on Newt. Maybe in the war to stop Romney he used valuable conservative resources and ended up causing Romney to win in the end. However at this point Newt is the only one still in the fight to stop Romney. To my thinking, we haven't reached Appomattox until Romney has 1144 delegates.
58 posted on 04/24/2012 8:43:09 PM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Certainty of death. Small chance of success what are we waiting for. Gimili - Lord of the Rings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy
Read a history book. Do not put Travis and Washington in the same sentence. Washington was a realist, that is why he won after a long brilliant campaign. He knew his resources and planned a strategy of keeping his army alive. He used the vastness of North America to defeat one of the 18th centuries finest militaries. Travis on the other hand was massacred by a peasant conscript army that had just marched through a dessert and was on the verge of starving to death. When it comes to adversaries, Santa Anna was not even in the same league as Howe and Clinton. Houston followed the Washington model, not the Travis stupidity.
59 posted on 04/24/2012 8:45:29 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Newt may be Bragg in mental stability. In regards to Lee, his focus on Virginia and the East might have been the strategic blunder that lost the war. The Confederacy was destroyed in the West. Lee’s failure to realize that and his two offensives to the North that wasted valuable resources that the South did not have. Lee was a brilliant tactical commander, but he lacked the strategic picture. Jefferson Davis had a better handle on that in his advocacy of a purely defensive fight, and a Davis had his eye on the West more than Lee did.


60 posted on 04/24/2012 8:52:01 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Agreed, but the fight at this point is to deny delegates, and we need to consolidate behind either Paul or Gingrich. If Gingrich blew Paul out of the water, he’d have won my vote tonight as spoiler. That didn’t happen.

Paul btw wins delegates in Rhode Island (4 from the Congressional district), and may win some more in CT and in New York.


61 posted on 04/24/2012 9:08:15 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: gusty

Would have been interesting to see a campaign in the west.

Texas ended up nearly saving the whole kit’n’kaboodle.

The problem is purely logistics. Concentrations of troops over to the west would have taken a long time, and the threat was a union knockout blow in the east. Lee would have had to build fortifications to stop the Army of Virginia, who’s sole job was to tie up Lee in the East.

Lee saw things this way. He couldn’t knock the north out with a Western Campaign, he had to fight and win in the East, and he knew that a long struggle would lose the war. The war was lost not with the armies but the Navies. The north could afford to build both, while the South couldn’t.

This was the Anaconda plan. Any western offensive wouldn’t have solved the strategic problems in the South wrt supply + munitions.


62 posted on 04/24/2012 9:13:39 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Diogenesis

A-fricken-men. We can’t win with him. Any money spent on him, is funding the British, as if it were to go to the King personally and deliver it to him.


64 posted on 04/24/2012 9:16:04 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]




Are any of you one of those fools, tools, trolls, or sleepers that associate with, or hire, or do any business whatsoever with anyone from these groups that voted for Obama in these percentages in 2008? :


99%
78%
67%




65 posted on 04/24/2012 9:57:46 PM PDT by devolve (---- --------insanity_is_alive_and_mucho_malignant----------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Santorum sat his last push out, he knew he couldn't win Pa and so threw in the towel rather than go thru the political embarrassment of loosing Pa again and hurt his upcoming political career....

I'm proud of Newt for being the last Conservative standing...and I was Proud to vote for him today...he hasn't swayed from his intentions and stayed the course with ‘all’ against him....and he's not letting the media nor the other candidates determine if or when he's out...he's going the distance he feels is right for this country and I'm glad that he is.

66 posted on 04/24/2012 10:07:39 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

Right on the money friend!!! Anybody But Obama!!!


67 posted on 04/24/2012 10:47:37 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, political ly!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01

An interesting thought. Is it possible that Free Republic might be used in the fall to campaign for Obama? That would be unreal.


68 posted on 04/24/2012 11:33:23 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Autonomous User

>>The iceberg’s on the starboard bow
>>Won’t you dance with me newt....

Screw that. I’m findin’ a Tea kettle to paddle with a stick.


69 posted on 04/24/2012 11:53:16 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

People don’t have to be excited about a candidate they vote for; they just have to be excited enough to vote against the other candidate.

If nothing else, Romney is close friends with Netanyahu. It will be far easier to vote for someone who cares about Israel and to vote against someone who apparently despises it.


70 posted on 04/25/2012 1:41:00 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
You know you have just an opinion. You are not factual.

This site is not to promote Romney by the way.

71 posted on 04/25/2012 1:48:15 AM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Romney supporters are getting brave.


72 posted on 04/25/2012 1:49:29 AM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Man of La Mancha.
73 posted on 04/25/2012 3:28:58 AM PDT by Happy Rain (VOTE FOR OBAMA OR HE WILL EAT YOUR DOG!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL
“Under any circumstance we are going to be at every single event we outlined this week and our expectation is that we’ll continue to campaign until Romney gets to 1144 delegates.

This is all I need to hear! This means Newt is fighting til the bitter end and that's what matters!

If by some miracle Romney doesn't make it then conservatives have a chance to totally wreak havoc on the GOPe and even if Romney does get 1144, I'm not sure we still won't raise Cain, I don't see how conservatives can afford not too! I know one thing either way The GOPe/RNC/rinos/moderates are going have to deal with a conservative can of whoop ass! I see no other choice for conservatives at this point to either fight or outright give the republican party the middle finger salute and walk because I'm personally sick of this crap!

To all you Romney supporters, have fun with this election because it is going to be pretty dismal for you rino supporting traitor ABO kissasses!

74 posted on 04/25/2012 3:33:40 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01; SoDak
I understand FR does not want people promoting Romney but will there be rules for these "FReepers" who now say they are going to use this forum to campaign for Obama?

If that's the case how is FR different than MoveOn or DU?

Who says FR is different in wanting to keep TRAITORS out??? This is a CONSERVATIVE site, why would we want to discuss supporting rino/moderate/GOPe/liberal/socialist/marxist idiots!

The only RULE is, GFY!

75 posted on 04/25/2012 3:44:43 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

All it takes is one social conservative, scripture quoting candidate to enter the race and play spoiler like Huckabee or Santorum and the remaining conservative vote splinters to pieces..

...but that same dynamic holds true for the lefty’s as well...we don’t see it this year because Obama is unopposed...next time around, I’m looking forward to the Dem’s and their internecine warfare to riddle their chances at the WH in 2016, at which time I believe if Jesus Himself were to run for them, they would be soundly defeated, because of their dissension...and they’ll be the ones making ridiculous comments on their blogs about ‘purity’ and ‘remaining true to liberal principle’ when their ideological soulmates are making quixotic clowns out of themselves by running up debt and finishing primaries with single digit numbers...
...it’s probably true that Obama wins a second term, and that Romney’s political career will be over after November, though of course anything is possible...but looking at the electoral college map, and the swing state’s polling data, Romney’s got a real mountain to climb...but if he does win, and the country doesn’t implode, it will be interesting to see what the posters on this forum have to say about him...


76 posted on 04/25/2012 4:06:02 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

When told Romney is their only choice, people stayed home!..

...and you take that to be a lack of ‘groundswell’ support for Romney? Looks more like laziness because this race is settled already...has nothing at all to do with enthusiasm in November, when nothing will be settled and the votes matter...


77 posted on 04/25/2012 4:14:54 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

To all you Romney supporters, have fun with this election because it is going to be pretty dismal for you rino supporting traitor ABO kissasses!

...OK, Barack Hussein, if you say so...


78 posted on 04/25/2012 4:41:16 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Newt reminds me more and more of Milton Waddams in Office Space.

“actually, he doesn’t work here anymore, he just doesn’t know it”

LOL


79 posted on 04/25/2012 4:48:34 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
The kenyan should thank the liberal GOP and the 'anybody but Obama' crowd that enables them. Because Romney has the same chance as Bush 1, Dole, and McCain.

Right -- I'll bet the halls of the Dems are resounding with jubilation today.

80 posted on 04/25/2012 5:05:30 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: skr
If nothing else, Romney is close friends with Netanyahu.

According to Romney in a widely quoted NYT interview, which seems to be the only source. Yes, they've known each other since their time at Boston Consulting Group in 1976 and have had intermittent contact, but I don't see any similar affirmation from Netanyahu, only a wishy-washy quote from an aide.

Nothing in the local (MA) gossip suggests that Romney knows what a "close friend" is.

81 posted on 04/25/2012 5:21:27 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: VinL

True. It’s a no brainer.

Romney is a horrible candidate.

Newt has the potential—based on his record, what he’s been saying and the lessons he’s learned in life—to be as good as or better than Ronald Reagan.

There’s nothing to lose in throwing all our support behind Gingrich.


82 posted on 04/25/2012 5:34:22 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Why do you seek the living among the dead? (Luke 24:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Romney won all the northeast states. Surprise, surprise. How many would he win in November. I’d bet none.

Do we want the whole country to look like Massachusetts when Romney was governor? I hope not.


83 posted on 04/25/2012 5:39:42 AM PDT by McGruff (Vote for Newt. The only conservative left in the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
"Because Romney has the same chance as Bush 1..."

...the 41st President of the United States.

84 posted on 04/25/2012 5:52:03 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gusty
No, you're right, they definitely were not both American heroes; and should never be mentioned together. I'm sure losing after 13 days when you are outnumbered 15 to 1 is the very definition of military stupidity. Should have been an easy victory for Travis and no amount of courage was shown by his men. I will be sure to acquire a modern liberal revisionist history book that states that.

Thank you for the enriching political discussion regarding the topic of the thread.

85 posted on 04/25/2012 5:52:42 AM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Certainty of death. Small chance of success what are we waiting for. Gimili - Lord of the Rings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
That doesn't even make any sense...Is that all you got?

Go ahead cast your LOSING vote, no matter what the result, the republican party and America loses, horribly.

What astounds me is some conservatives can't understand the "absolute" detrimental effect of this GOPe/rino vote. For everybody else, it doesn't matter at this point...Some are just too ignorant of history to understand.

86 posted on 04/25/2012 5:57:16 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
..has nothing at all to do with enthusiasm in November,

Oh yes it does. We chatted with the poll workers. They said no one was enthusiastic, more fatalistic. And that the primary was not well advertised or promoted.

Romney is a loser.

87 posted on 04/25/2012 5:59:57 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: skr
they just have to be excited enough to vote

And they weren't. And I'm not the only FReeper that's talking about empty polling places.

88 posted on 04/25/2012 6:01:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: VinL

I proudly supported Newt in the GA primary, and will continue to do so. The Romneybots hate to hear the truth, but here it is: IF YOU VOTE FOR ROMNEY, YOU ARE BLATANTLY SUPPORTING MARXISM. Goooooooooooo NEWT!!!!!


89 posted on 04/25/2012 6:07:54 AM PDT by arderkrag ("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Frankly I think it’s kind of a dumb decision.

That being said, hey, more power to him. I agree with you. If he annoys the Blue Bloods and Lamestream media than this makes me happy.


90 posted on 04/25/2012 6:41:57 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

I voted for Newt yesterday here in the swamps of Delaware.

He did the best in Delaware yesterday, garnering 27% of the vote.

He would have won this state but recent happenstances changed and affected so much.

First, Santorum and Paul were BOTH on the Delaware Republican primary ballot yesterday. Between those two, about 12% of the vote was likely siphoned from Newt.

Second, there’d been big rumors last week that Newt was cancelling his North Carolina appearances and, while Newt’s campaign denied, it greatly affected the turnout.

Voter turnout was very lackluster yesterday. Had all that crap last week not been thrown out there to be repeated hysterically by the media (and to make me wonder if it wasn’t some operative in the Romney campaign somehow making this happen) I believe turnout would have been higher.

In short, I’m quite certain that Delaware, where we kicked out Mike Castle and voted in Christine O’Donnell to great ridicule, would be Newt all the way over Romney given a fair and vibrant primary.


91 posted on 04/25/2012 6:49:03 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Fox reporting Newt is “wrapping up campaign” in a week and “will probably endorse Romney” on that day...


92 posted on 04/25/2012 6:55:45 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
"...but looking at the electoral college map, and the swing state’s polling data, Romney’s got a real mountain to climb..."

What? Are you referring to the Gallup/USAToday 'poll'?

The one that sampled "Registered voters" not "Likely voters"?

The one that included 7 Bobo-in-2008 states the GOP nom doesn't need to win? [CO, IA, MI, NH, NM, PA, WI]

PA & MI included as "swing states" when the last time those two of those large states went GOP was 1998?

Indiana excluded from a swing state poll despite going for Obama in 2008?

Here's what you need to know: The Electoral Math of 2012 greatly favors the challenger... 2008 + IN, NC, FL, NV, VA, OH = 271EV.

93 posted on 04/25/2012 7:07:52 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

"PA & MI included as "swing states" when the last time those two large states went GOP was 1988?"

24 years ago. That swing state poll was pure bs.

94 posted on 04/25/2012 7:12:17 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
We chatted with the poll workers. They said no one was enthusiastic, more fatalistic

In my district the poll workers were likewise. Some actually stated, "What are we voting for" with arms swung up! Distraught over Romney proclaiming his win before he had the delegates, and the media vocally shutting out the election and claiming Romneys win so that any who voted would indeed check Romney....and many followed the pitch.

95 posted on 04/25/2012 7:22:02 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: caww

The MSM suppressed the vote. The advocacy journalism is blatantly obvious.


96 posted on 04/25/2012 7:28:21 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
The MSM suppressed the vote. The advocacy journalism is blatantly obvious.

The media has power it should not have, but like the candidates, money does move these machines. They own.. 'the message'... the public is to get, regardless of reality, and will paint whatever picture is necessary to position who they will favorably... and destroy those otherwise.

97 posted on 04/25/2012 7:44:01 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: caww

The media has always had power. They were infiltrated by the left and started using that power to push their POV. And the sheep haven’t caught on.


98 posted on 04/25/2012 7:54:12 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth; onyx; Jim Robinson; TheOldLady
LOL you need to read. I have never said "vote for romney" nor would I. I voted for Santorum.

2 FReepers last night stated "I will actively campaign for Obama now."

No it wasn't sarcastic.

I can understand people staying home or voting for a write in.

But if these FReepers will be posting Obama / Biden 12 Propaganda here, then you will see a mass exodus.

Since I cannot find their posts I'm assuming the Mods deleted it, which is a comforting thing.

Most FReepers voted for Newt or Santorum, none of us who voted that way have told people to vote for Mitt Romney.

But when FReepers tell people to vote for Obama, that is offensive to me.

99 posted on 04/25/2012 8:03:17 AM PDT by Dengar01 (Go Bulls!!! Go White Sox!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper; katiedidit1; onyx; Jim Robinson; TheOldLady; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; ...
If Romney wins the nomination, I will actively campaign against him.

None of my conservative aquaintances will vote for Romney.

He has the same chance as Dole and McCain.

/johnny

Found it! Please don't try and twist this statement Katie you know what JRandomFreeper means in this statement.

FR is against RINOs! And I support FReepers in their beliefs but this is not a forum to support Barack Hussein Obama!!!

100 posted on 04/25/2012 8:09:39 AM PDT by Dengar01 (Go Bulls!!! Go White Sox!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson