You mean to say five American defendants who got, say, 100 years for rape, wouldnt be reported as a total amount?.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Five men were convicted. One was NOT convicted of rape, had he been, the total figure would have been 48-50 years, ie about 10 years each.
Someone kidnaps a child in America and gang rapes her over a period of days and is caught dead to rights, that criminal will be sentenced to a lot more than ten years. Twenty-five to life is more like it. Maybe death.
You know how you and your simpering, emasculated socialist brethren are always sobbing about how many people are in jail in the U.S.? Well, we jail people because we prefer doing that to leaving them out free among us, raping our children. It's a cultural difference between the US and Europe.
Ten years is about the standard sentence in the UK for rape. The court/judge has obviously chosen to give a concurrent sentence.
Again you bow to your socialist and jihadi masters. These defendants averaged well below ten years each and they were guilty of multiple counts of rape of minors, multiple counts of kidnapping, assault, etc. This is a disgrace and you know it.
One hundred years ago Scotsmen were world leaders. Now you all produce only knifings. Another fifty years (or less) and it will be full-on Sharia. You have squandered in a couple of generations that which it took your ancestors centuries to build.
"Esau selleth his byrthright for a messe of potage"
‘The article was written in such a way as to obscure the leniency of the sentencing. You pretend not to understand this because you have traded your manhood for a council flat and crappy national health care.’
Actually I have a £250000 flat, and access to private healthcare (BUPA)but thanks for asking. And the NHS is far better than Americans think.
‘Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying.’
Fair enough. But as I said, thats a newspaper standard in the UK, it has always been that way. Damn all to do with dhimmitude. If the rapists had been blue eyes blonde Aryan god types, it would still be reported that way.
‘Someone kidnaps a child in America and gang rapes her over a period of days and is caught dead to rights, that criminal will be sentenced to a lot more than ten years. Twenty-five to life is more like it. Maybe death.
You know how you and your simpering, emasculated socialist brethren are always sobbing about how many people are in jail in the U.S.? Well, we jail people because we prefer doing that to leaving them out free among us, raping our children. It’s a cultural difference between the US and Europe.’
I am a conservative, with hardline views on crime and prison. You are making the mistake of thinking because such sentences exist, all Britons are happy with them. I and many millions arent. Increasingly so.
‘Again you bow to your socialist and jihadi masters. These defendants averaged well below ten years each and they were guilty of multiple counts of rape of minors, multiple counts of kidnapping, assault, etc. This is a disgrace and you know it.’
Agreed. Again, I and millions of Brits would prefer sentences of double or triple that. And whilst it IS a disgrace, please stop calling it a jihadi disgrace. These men were not jailed for so little because of dhimmtitude, again, I point out that rightly or wrongly, that is the current sentence and has been for some time. If there were no Muslims in the UK, that would still be the average sentence.
‘One hundred years ago Scotsmen were world leaders. Now you all produce only knifings.’
Not quite.
‘Another fifty years (or less) and it will be full-on Sharia. You have squandered in a couple of generations that which it took your ancestors centuries to build.’
Oh rubbish. There are 50000 Muslims in Scotland, which has a population of 5 million. And almost all live in Glasgow, Edinburgh, and towns on the west coast. There are no Muslims in power or major business. And the Scots Muslim community has managed to prevent any extremism catching fire, in fact the only Muslim terrorist from Scotland has been a white convert from Dundee!.
And Islam has not conquered the UK. We keep telling you that but you dont listen. 95.4% of the UK is not Muslim. 92% is white. As much as I disagreed with the decision to allow Sharia law into the UK, I have pointed out constantly that it is a CIVIL law only, and ONLY exists in five English cities, with no plans to expand. And does not exist in Scotland, NI or Wales.