Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/12/2012 4:48:56 AM PDT by submarinerswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: submarinerswife

Wonder what Lincoln’s wife did for a living?


3 posted on 04/12/2012 4:52:07 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

I guess I’m old enough to remember a time when most of my friends moms, including mine, were stay at home moms who ran the household and raised us kids while dad worked.

Are they really attacking the concept of single worker families now?


4 posted on 04/12/2012 4:53:41 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

Romney takes are of his, and we are supposed to be pi$$ed about it? I dont remember Jackie-O doing much or Eleanor Roosevelt.

/actually having to defend Romney #need-a-shower


5 posted on 04/12/2012 4:56:13 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

Did pelosi ever work? She was house speaker.

Who cares what a first lady does anyway.


8 posted on 04/12/2012 5:00:38 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife
Dear Hilary Rosen, Thank you for doing something I only thought Moderate Republicans are capable of doing- saying something stupid just when you were about to win an election.

Now Ann Romney has gone from the rich queen who lives in mansions, to a sympathetic stay-at-home mother who cares more about her kids than trying to head up the corporate ladder until your uterus dries out.

10 posted on 04/12/2012 5:01:32 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Democrats- Forgetting 9/11 since 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

How about the stupid, dishonest Democrats just shut up.


11 posted on 04/12/2012 5:01:41 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Socialism isn't going to work this time, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

And, the Welfare Queens sit in front of their (government) TV’s sayin “dat’s right, dat Cracker B*t*h she ain’t never worked a day in her life”.


13 posted on 04/12/2012 5:02:55 AM PDT by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

Although I hate “Mittens,” I highly respect his wife for she holds one of the most important positions in this country...the housewife.

We find ourselves in the current moral position of today simply by the fact that housewife’s are a rare commodity today and the current generation has left child rearing to the government or schools (indoctrination centers) and daycare facilities.

Long gone are the days of Ozzie and Harriet and the days of raising children to be men or women with work ethic and morals.

With the passing of the housewife, came the passing of our moral society.


14 posted on 04/12/2012 5:04:27 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

Rasing good and decent children doesnt’t meam much anymore!


18 posted on 04/12/2012 5:08:41 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

Neither did Obama himself, you moron (Rosen)!


19 posted on 04/12/2012 5:12:05 AM PDT by Corporate Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

Fellow partners at SKDKnickerbocker.

20 posted on 04/12/2012 5:12:23 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

FIVE kids.
SIXTEEN grandkids.
AND ‘never worked’—really?


21 posted on 04/12/2012 5:16:05 AM PDT by Flintlock (Picture ID for ALL voting. Let our dead rest in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

The Democrats’ War on Women

Posted By Arnold Ahlert On April 12, 2012 @ 12:50 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

The so-called Republican “war on women” currently being trumpeted by Democrats (with ample help from an ever-accommodating media) has exposed the absurd depths of the leftist entitlement mentality and its disdain for the concept of religious freedom. It was highlighted by the testimony of Sandra Fluke, who contended that her birth control should be underwritten by others regardless of their religious convictions. Yet if war is defined as something that does genuine damage to the interests of women, it is Democrats, via the sexual revolution and its all-out attack on traditional values, who have waged a war against women for decades. What has the Democratic war on women brought us?

First and foremost, it has brought us the wholesale destruction of the nuclear family, and the resultant poverty and crime that attends it. Currently 41 percent of children are born to single mothers, most of whom are low-income women in their early and mid-20s. In the black American community, that percentage soars to a staggering 72 percent. Male child abandonment is now a rampant aspect of our society. These trends are directly connected to Democrats’ and president Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society,” and the critical changes they made to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program (AFDC). A program once reserved for funding once-married women who had lost the primary male supporter of the family was expanded to include any household where there was no male family head present.

In 1965, Daniel Patrick Moynihan predicted where such a change would lead–when the out-of-wedlock birthrate was 24 percent among black Americans and (4 percent for white Americans). He was excoriated by liberals saying that a “lack of equal education and opportunity” were the true root of the problem. 47 years and triple the number of out-of-wedlock births later, liberals are still using the same rationale to defend their position....

Read at:

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/04/12/the-democrats-war-on-women/print/


24 posted on 04/12/2012 5:31:42 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

My ire is drawn. SAHMs and working Moms often have a vicious dislike for each other’s life choices.
SAHM= lazy, husband leaching know-nothing
Working Mom= leaves kids for job, children raised by strangers. Spends little to no time with her children.

Hillary Rosen is a vile feminazi who just slandered and disrespected me and millions of SAHMs.

I know what people think of SAHMs, even if they are taking care of their kids. It is the ultimate slap in the face from a society that is collapsing and imploding right before our eyes. SAHMs dare think that supervising our kids is important. Making meals, reading, and spending time with our children is considered “lazy.”

I love my kids, and value them and their well-being. I want them to be moral and intelligent. I do not want them to grow up latch key and ignorant, raised by HBO and the internet.

If women want to work, that is their choice. I envy women who work and have their mother or trusted family to watch their kids while they earn their check. If I could do that, I would work.


26 posted on 04/12/2012 5:38:33 AM PDT by baileybat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

CDC: Nearly 1 in 4 babies born to unwed cohabitors

Apr 12, 12:12 AM (ET)

By MIKE STOBBE

ATLANTA (AP) - Health officials say nearly 1 in 4 babies are born to unmarried couples who are living together, a significant jump from a decade ago.

The government previously said more than 40 percent of births are to unwed mothers. But a report released Thursday offers new detail showing most unwed births occur in cohabiting couples.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study was based on face-to-face interviews with more than 22,000 men and women during 2006 through 2010.

About 23 percent of the reported births were to unmarried heterosexual couples who were living together when the child was born. That was up from 14 percent when a similar study was done in 2002. The CDC did not speculate on reasons for the increase.


Online:

CDC report: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs


27 posted on 04/12/2012 5:39:32 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

Eleanor Roosevelt, Jackie Kennedy, Rosalynn Carter, michelle obama.


28 posted on 04/12/2012 5:46:31 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife
Moochelle has been a racist America Hater until the clown became nominee, didn't change her a bit she is a lying racist America hater.
30 posted on 04/12/2012 5:59:21 AM PDT by boomop1 (term limits is the only way to save this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

This coming from a family who had a position that was created at a Chicago hospital that was for $300,000 something a year, and is no longer there. Michele O just had to sit on her fat ass and collect checks. Last I checked she’s been partying it up for the last three years on our dime while we’ve been getting shafted financially by her husband.


32 posted on 04/12/2012 6:02:32 AM PDT by erod (This Chicagoan will crawl over broken glass to vote the fake Chicagoan Obama out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

The closet thing Obama has to a job is his current one, which is questionable at that, with all his golfing, vacations, and campaigning. Our affirmative action president had his handout all his life.


35 posted on 04/12/2012 6:13:11 AM PDT by kenmcg (How)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: submarinerswife

What is obvious is Obama and his ilk hate women. Sarah Palin was derided because she did not stay home with her 5 children. Ann Romney is now marginalized because she did stay home with her 5 children. Obama will make this election about Ann and women, just like he made the last one about Sarah. He is such a pussy boy, he can’t run against the men. Look at what his policies have done for women. Nothing!! Higher unemployment, more on welfare, more childless. I believe he hated his mother and had no respect for his grandmother. Women are only tools and props to him. Get them arguing and distracted from the issues and he gets a pass.


36 posted on 04/12/2012 6:25:35 AM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson