To: grobdriver
The Osprey is a dangerous aircraft. It was in development for over 20 years because it was so dangerous. When it couldn’t meet the operational requirements, they simply lowered the requirements.
15 posted on
04/11/2012 5:44:33 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
There was a question of how long that fancy double diaphragm drive that synchronizes the left/right rotors would last. My former boss was going to bid the stress analysis job. I'm not sure it was ever done as the parties interested in doing the analysis couldn't figure out how to couple the vibration signature into a sensor to monitor it. When (not if) that diaphragm fails from work hardening, the bird falls out of the sky.
21 posted on
04/11/2012 6:41:22 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: Blood of Tyrants
And yet it STILL has killed less Marines per flight hour than the aircraft it replaces, the CH-46.
23 posted on
04/12/2012 1:05:34 AM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I believe so also. A digression...the B-2 has quaternary computer control of the aileron surfaces.....FOUR level backup! It cannot be flown without computer trim .....that should tell us something.....
34 posted on
04/13/2012 6:58:36 AM PDT by
Gaffer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson