Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26

The USSC case was about a police department that was just flying over whole neighborhoods with IR cameras looking for “hot” houses which would be grow homes.

they were looking inside homes with tech and were doing so without any probable cause and without any warrant. The USSC slapped them hard over that.

Better tech does not make peeping legal.


34 posted on 04/11/2012 2:21:48 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
Exactly.

Had they been flying generally and seen marijuana plants growing visually outside a building, they would have been fine, but as you said the previous case was a no no.

In this case, they are fine however. Courts are loathe to enter into how an arrest was made. People kidnapped overseas by private citizens and returned to the US against their will have been held to have no immunity from arrest.

35 posted on 04/11/2012 2:49:22 PM PDT by MindBender26 (New Army SF and Ranger Slogan: Vengeance is Mine, sayeth the Lord.... but He subcontracts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson