Posted on 03/26/2012 4:26:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
Author’s Note: I will be speaking in Still Hall Auditorium at Clarion University in Clarion, PA this Thursday, March 29th. The speech will begin at 7 p.m. and will last about 75 minutes unless it is aborted before it comes to term. I’ll let you guess the topic.
My recent engagement lasted only a few days and has resulted in some unfortunate rumors spreading across the internet. It is therefore necessary for me to take a break from the usual subject matter of my columns in order to shed some light on a most unfortunate turn of events.
Anna and I met a few years ago and formed a quick friendship. We both enjoy running, reading, and listening to live music in some of the local establishments in Wilmington and Wrightsville Beach. Our time together was often limited by my hectic travel schedule.
Back in September, however, we began to spend a lot more time together. Just a couple of weeks ago, while we were hanging out on the south end of Wrightsville Beach, I proposed marriage. In a fit of temporary insanity, she accepted. We began to make plans for our wedding until things changed drastically just a few days ago.
After we became engaged, Anna revealed a secret to me. I always knew she was adopted. But I did not know that when she was 32 years old she embarked on a mission to locate her adoptive mother. She did this so she could learn the reasons why she was given up for adoption. She did it for peace of mind but the result of her research was unsettling: Anna found out she was a product of rape.
When I found out the news, I acted immediately. I killed Anna while she was sleeping and then dumped for body off of Johnny Mercer’s pier at Wrightsville Beach. And now I face a long legal battle in which my lawyers will attempt to argue that Anna, as a product of rape, does not have the same rights as other persons. In fact, whatever rights she may possess are outweighed by a compelled need to destroy evidence of rape, which might remind a rape victim of a past sexual assault.
My argument will be simple: I believe that Anna was no more or less of a person as an adult than she was as an unborn child. Therefore, it would have been permissible to kill her at either stage of development so long as that killing was motivated by compassion for the victim of rape.
I anticipate four rebuttals to my argument. Accordingly, I present my counterarguments to all of them below:
1. Size. Some say that the unborn are not persons simply because they are smaller than those who have been born. This is a dangerous argument. If we accept it, we destroy both racial and gender equality. Asians are smaller than blacks. Women are smaller than men. Are we really prepared to say that Asian women are not fully persons? What fraction of a person are they in relation to black men? Are they three-fifths of a person?
2. Level of development. Some will say that personhood is attained at a certain level of development or that it varies with development. This is also a dangerous argument that destroys human equality. A twenty-two year old woman has a fully functioning reproductive system and, in many cases, a college degree. A two year old girl has neither. Is she therefore a non-person? Or is she just a partial person? Could she be killed legally? Or would her killing be considered a lesser form of homicide?
3. Environment. A woman in Los Angeles had her baby two months before it was due. Her sister in New York had an abortion one month before it was due. Could the woman in Los Angeles have killed her baby one month after it was born? Why not? There is no difference in size or development between these two East and West Coast cousins. Are we prepared to say that moving eight inches down a birth canal makes one a person? Since when does where you are determine what you are? Be careful before you answer. And be careful before you take your next step.
4. Degree of dependency. The older I get, the worse this argument seems to become. If we are prepared to say that we become persons when we become independent then we must also be saying that we can lose our personhood. This can happen due to a car accident, a serious illness, or simply due to old age. Regardless, this just doesn’t work. Besides, I know some 16 year olds that could be killed according to this logic.
It should be evident from the foregoing that it is high time that we stop playing games with human equality. We all know the unborn are persons. And we’ve been killing them in the womb for years. In fact, we’ve been enshrining the practice in the constitution since 1973. If we say that the reason we have been doing so is that the unborn are only “potential” persons then we must be prepared for some pretty broad implications.
I propose instead that we carve out a narrow defense to homicide that allows us to kill products of rape because they remind us of a painful violent event. That is the best way to deal with things from my perspective. It will make the world appear to be a better place. Of course, there will be more murder. But it will seem like there is less rape. And that will make all the killing worth our while.
I guess Mr. Adams also has a modest proposal for dealing with the great numbers of unadopted children in this country. ;-)
Good article.
And if unborn Downs Syndrome children are better off dead, why don’t we kill the ones that survived birth?
If you press a liberal on this point, you’ll find that many agree.
I tell my kids that half the people they meet think that abortion should be legal. It gives one perspective.
As a side note my buddy got a restraining order placed against him for leaving this song on his ex wifes answering machine.
> I guess Mr. Adams also has a modest proposal for dealing
> with the great numbers of unadopted children in this
> country.
Ever try to adopt?
Do you know what the legal fees are?
Do you know that birth mother can change her mind and have the court take the child away from you?
Would you agree to an “open adoption” where the birth parents have visitation rights?
Change those laws, and adoption may become more popular.
I have no doubt that song has gotten more than one guy in trouble over the years. lol
Do you know what the legal fees are?
Do you know that birth mother can change her mind and have the court take the child away from you?
Would you agree to an “open adoption” where the birth parents have visitation rights?
Change those laws, and adoption may become more popular.
Yes,to all the above......My son and his wife wanted to adopt due to being UN-able to have children. When the lawyer told them the cost, they couldn’t afford it. However they now have a child at age forty one. He’s a beautiful little boy , born with.... http://www.lpch.org/DiseaseHealthInfo/HealthLibrary/cardiac/hlhs.html which just makes him more precious.
take away social worker barriers against adoption of children by parents of a different race
allow special needs children who are adopted to retain their MEDICAID health care (as with foster kids) so that
adoptive families do not face banrupcty trying to pay the medical bills
treat the churches as partners, not opponents, in placing children
re-look the “open adoption” that mandates adoptive parents try to keep alive damaging, dysfunctional relationships with addicted. abusive, or criminal birth families for young children or wounded children or children old enough to say “NO”
lift the adoption agency and industry barriers and virtually every child in America will be adopted
Those with profound mental disorders may not all be adopted (this does not include Downs, for whom there are waiting lists of adoptive parents) - but one cannot rationalize abortion based on a fairly specific demographic of children with RAD etc who need to be raised in supportive therapeutic settings
Congratulations to them!
And even at 41, they are “spring chickens” so if they want to adopt again they should look into religious organizations that have reduced fees or perhaps an organization like WACAP or Little Miracles that waives or reduces fees for “waiting” children
The federal (and often state) tax credits (direct CREDITS) can make up quite lot of the fees for some adoptions
Adams has always been an effective writer.
Is abortion really an acceptable alternative?
My wife and I have what is supposed to be our final hearing today at 10:30 A.M. central time, Tazewell County court house (Illinois), on adopting two children. I am 66 and my wife is 59. Total cost, spread over the last 18 months, $3,000.
If all goes as planned, I will be writing and posting a vanity, in chat, including pictures.
so if they want to adopt again they should look into religious organizations
Thanks for the info. and the re.
Don’t think they themselves will be interested in adopting, but others reading this will be interested in using this info..
Their child is now fourteen months old, and will need consistent care during his life time. His mother is a school teacher, and his father is a barber. They take turns each night caring for their little fellow, they want to be interdependent in caring for his needs. This is very difficult, having to get up three to four times each night. Family on both sides have offered to help, but they are wanting to provide his care themselves, why?...don’t know.
Neither of them are selfish, just something the two of them want to do.
> My wife and I have what is supposed to be our final
> hearing today at 10:30 A.M. central time, Tazewell County
> court house (Illinois), on adopting two children.
My heartfelt congratulations!
> I am 66 and my wife is 59.
Good to know that your state does not have a lower age limit. I don’t know how old your adopted children are, but the age limit I got was that the youngest marriage partner must be no more than 45 years older than the youngest child.
> spread over the last 18 months
I forgot to mention the length of time involved.
> Total cost ... $3000
You’ve done much better than most!
Sister and brother, ages 13 and 12 respectively, we’ve had legal guardianship for almost 4 years.
I had a family member drop out of Clarion after one semester because the place was literally overrun with radical feminist moonbats.
there is no law about age, that usually is a purely social worker decision an may differ form agency to agency
There are folks in their 50s and 60’s adopting, some of us go international. If willing to adopt a child age 10 and above and you are healthy and can provide financially and set up guardian security, you can find a way to adopt
Every child deserves a family The tax code provides generous tax credits that can cover a lot of the expense
> some of us go international.
We adopted a sibling group internationally. Two are special needs, one is borderline. Oldest was 11 when the adoption was made final. It was a very lengthy and costly process, but it was well worth it. They are beautiful, and we THANK GOD for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.